| To: | Jonny Pops LLC (dockmpls@merchantgould.com) |
| Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90237103 - CARBON NEGATIVE - 18142.12US01 |
| Sent: | March 13, 2021 11:50:32 AM |
| Sent As: | ecom103@uspto.gov |
| Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
|
U.S. Application Serial No. 90237103
Mark: CARBON NEGATIVE
|
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
|
Applicant: Jonny Pops LLC
|
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 18142.12US01
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: March 13, 2021
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL – MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes a feature or characteristic of applicant’s goods. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.
Here, applicant seeks registration of CARBON NEGATIVE (a standard character mark) for use with “Ice cream, Frozen Confections, Frozen desserts,” in International Class 30. The attached evidence from the edie website shows that the term “carbon negative” means “The reduction of an entity’s carbon footprint to less than neutral, so that the entity has a net effect of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere rather than adding it.” In addition, the attached evidence from the WhatIs.com website shows that the wording in the applied-for mark means “the reduction of an entity’s carbon footprint to less than neutral, so that the entity in question has a net effect of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere rather than adding it.” Applicant’s goods are broadly identified and include ice cream, frozen confections, and frozen desserts that are produced by a company with a carbon footprint that has been reduced to less than neutral, so that the entity has a net effect of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere rather than adding it. Therefore, applicant’s mark merely describes a feature or characteristic of applicant’s goods.
Based on the foregoing, registration of the applied-for mark is refused under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).
Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration. However, if applicant responds to the refusal, applicant must also respond to the requirements set forth below.
INFORMATION REQUEST
(1) Fact sheets, instruction manuals, brochures, advertisements and pertinent screenshots of applicant’s website as it relates to the goods in the application, including any materials using the terms in the applied-for mark. Merely stating that information about the goods is available on applicant’s website is insufficient to make the information of record.;
(2) If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for goods of the same type, explaining how its own product will differ. If the goods feature new technology and information regarding competing goods and/or services is not available, applicant must provide a detailed factual description of the goods. Factual information about the goods must make clear how they operate, salient features, and prospective customers and channels of trade.; and
(3) Applicant must respond to the following questions:
a) What is the projected carbon footprint associated with applicant’s production or manufacture of the ice cream to be offered with the proposed mark?
b) What is the projected carbon footprint associated with applicant’s production or manufacture of the frozen confections to be offered with the proposed mark?
c) What is the projected carbon footprint associated with applicant’s production or manufacture of the frozen desserts to be offered with the proposed mark?
d) Will applicant release any carbon dioxide into the environment in the course of the production or manufacture of the ice cream to be offered with the proposed mark?
e) Will applicant release any carbon dioxide into the environment in the course of the production or manufacture of the frozen confections to be offered with the proposed mark?
f) Will applicant release any carbon dioxide into the environment in the course of the production or manufacture of the frozen desserts to be offered with the proposed mark?
g) Do applicant’s competitors use “carbon negative” to advertise similar goods and/or services? If so, identify each such competitor.
h) Who is intended the typical consumer of applicant’s goods?
i) Where will applicant’s goods typically be purchased (provide examples of online and brick-and-mortar store venues)?
See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§814, 1402.01(e).
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.
INDEFINITE IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
International Class 30 – Ice cream, Frozen Confections; Frozen desserts, namely, ______ {Applicant must further specify, i.e. ice cream bars, fruit ice bars, etc.}
Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b). The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b). Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted. TMEP §1402.07(e).
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
APPLICANT’S DOMICILE ADDRESS REQUIRED
An individual applicant’s domicile is the place a person resides and intends to be the person’s principal home. 37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. A juristic entity’s domicile is the principal place of business, i.e., headquarters, where a juristic entity applicant’s senior executives or officers ordinarily direct and control the entity’s activities. 37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. An applicant whose domicile is located outside of the United States or its territories is foreign-domiciled and must be represented at the USPTO by a U.S.-licensed attorney qualified to practice before the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §11.14. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a).
The application record lists applicant as a juristic entity and specifies applicant’s domicile as a post office box instead of a street address. In most cases, a post office box is not acceptable as a domicile address because it does not identify the location of applicant’s headquarters where the entity’s senior executives or officers ordinarily direct and control the entity’s activities. See37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.189; Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3. Thus, applicant must provide its domicile street address. See 37 C.F.R. §2.189. Alternatively, an applicant may demonstrate that the listed address is, in fact, the applicant’s domicile. Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3.
To provide documentation supporting applicant’s domicile. Open the correct TEAS response form and enter the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #3, and on the “Additional Statement(s)” page, below the “Miscellaneous Statement” field, click the button below the text box to attach documentation to support the address.
To provide applicant’s domicile street address. After opening the correct TEAS response form and entering the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #5, and provide applicant’s street address on the “Owner Information” page. Information provided in the TEAS response form will be publicly viewable.
If applicant wants to hide its domicile address from public view because of privacy or other concerns, applicant must have a mailing address that can be made public and differs from its domicile address. In this case, applicant must follow the steps below in the correct order to ensure the domicile address will be hidden:
(1) First submit a TEAS Change Address or Representation (CAR) form. Open the form, enter the serial number, click “Continue,” and
(a) Use the radio buttons to select “Attorney” for the role of the person submitting the form;
(b) Answer “Yes” to the wizard question asking, “Do you want to UPDATE the mailing address, email address, phone or fax number(s) for the trademark owner/holder?” and click “Continue;”
(c) On the “Owner Information” page, if the previously provided mailing address has changed, applicant must enter its new mailing address in the “Mailing Address” field, which will be publicly viewable;
(d) On the “Owner Information” page, uncheck the box next to “Domicile Address” and enter the new domicile address in the text box immediately below the checkbox.
(2) Then submit a TEAS response form to indicate the domicile address has been changed. Open the form and
(a) Answer “yes” to wizard question #3 and click “Continue;”
(b) Click on the “Miscellaneous Statement” box on the “Additional Statement(s)” page, and enter a statement in the text box immediately below the checkbox that the domicile address was previously changed in the CAR form.
ADVISORY – RESPONSE ASSISTANCE
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Christopher M. Law/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 103
(571) 272-2913
christopher.law@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE
