PTO- 1957 |
Approved for use through 11/30/2023. OMB 0651-0050 |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 90199739 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 118 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | mark |
LITERAL ELEMENT | VIPER |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
The Examining Attorney has found no conflicting registered marks that would bar registration of Applicant’s VIPER mark (“Applicant’s Mark”). The Examining Attorney has, however, noted the existence of prior pending Application Nos. 88885937 for VIPERS, 88935357 for VIPER, 85118444 for VIPER, 77441560 for VIPER, 90008779 for SHADOWVIPER, and 88643524 for VIPER SAAS (collectively the “Noted Marks”), each as potential likelihood of confusion bars to registration under Trademark Act §2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d), should the applications mature to registration. Applicant respectfully submits that there is no likelihood of confusion between the Noted Marks and Applicant’s Mark, specifically on account of the fact that all six (6) separate marks identified are for the same VIPER term, all cover software products/services, and all are capable of coexisting on the USPTO Register. However, given the fact that the foregoing Noted Applications each remain pending (some even suspended), Applicant defers offering further substantive argument or evidence in response to each specific application in support of its position until the disposition of the Noted Applications becomes fully apparent. Nevertheless, in determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists, the fundamental inquiry goes to the cumulative effect of the differences in the marks and the goods/services at issue. Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 192 U.S.P.Q. 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976). It is quite possible for no likelihood of confusion to exist even between marks which may share a term, but, as is the case here, the record shows that they nevertheless evoke different commercial impressions and/or where the respective goods and services to which the marks are applied are such that prospective customers are not likely to assume that those goods or services share a common source. Thus, although Applicant’s Mark and the Noted Marks may each incorporate the term VIPER and all cover some form of software, these facts alone are far from dispositive of a likelihood of confusion. "Per se" rules relating to likelihood of confusion have been struck down as being too inflexible as contrary to trademark law, where each case must be decided based on its own facts and circumstances. See In re Quadram Corporation, 228 U.S.P.Q. 863, 865 (TTAB 1985). In this case, differences in the marks as a whole, the notable differences in the goods and services (as amended), sophistication of the customer, channels of trade, and the overall strength (or weakness) of each mark obviates any grounds for refusal. In view of the foregoing, it is respectfully submitted that the advisory notice/objection to registration under Section 2(d) should be withdrawn and the subject application be approved for publication. Finally, the Examining Attorney has also requested that the Applicant amend the identification of goods and services asserting that the present identification is overbroad. Applicant accepts the Examining Attorney suggested language and agrees to the following: IC 009. Computer hardware and peripheral devices and recorded software applications having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction and for use in analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles IC 042. Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software platform having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction and for use in analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles Accordingly, Applicant respectfully submits that the identification of goods and services is now acceptable for purposes of registration. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (009) (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Computer hardware and peripheral devices and recorded software applications having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction, analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (009) (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
Computer hardware and peripheral devices and recorded software applications having a graphical user interface for use
in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; |
|
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Computer hardware and peripheral devices and recorded software applications having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction and for use in analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles | |
WEBPAGE URL | None Provided |
WEBPAGE DATE OF ACCESS | None Provided |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (042) (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 042 |
DESCRIPTION | |
cloud-based software platform having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; non-downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction, analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (042) (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 042 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software platform having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction and for use in analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles | |
WEBPAGE URL | None Provided |
WEBPAGE DATE OF ACCESS | None Provided |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | CHRISTOPHER D. OLSZYK, JR. |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | ipdocket@foxrothschild.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | colszyk@foxrothschild.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 146628.90024 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | ipdocket@foxrothschild.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | colszyk@foxrothschild.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 146628.90024 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /CDO/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, PA Bar Member |
DATE SIGNED | 08/05/2021 |
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | Authorized U.S.-Licensed Attorney |
SIGNATURE METHOD | Signed directly within the form |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Thu Aug 05 13:37:16 ET 2021 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2 0210805133716329614-90199 739-781ed61e86ac6dc446968 1cf5cfdcbccec5e7aecc63384 d994cec21694d48f4-N/A-N/A -20210805132839708283 |
PTO- 1957 |
Approved for use through 11/30/2023. OMB 0651-0050 |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number |
The Examining Attorney has found no conflicting registered marks that would bar registration of Applicant’s VIPER mark (“Applicant’s Mark”). The Examining Attorney has, however, noted the existence of prior pending Application Nos. 88885937 for VIPERS, 88935357 for VIPER, 85118444 for VIPER, 77441560 for VIPER, 90008779 for SHADOWVIPER, and 88643524 for VIPER SAAS (collectively the “Noted Marks”), each as potential likelihood of confusion bars to registration under Trademark Act §2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d), should the applications mature to registration. Applicant respectfully submits that there is no likelihood of confusion between the Noted Marks and Applicant’s Mark, specifically on account of the fact that all six (6) separate marks identified are for the same VIPER term, all cover software products/services, and all are capable of coexisting on the USPTO Register. However, given the fact that the foregoing Noted Applications each remain pending (some even suspended), Applicant defers offering further substantive argument or evidence in response to each specific application in support of its position until the disposition of the Noted Applications becomes fully apparent.
Nevertheless, in determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists, the fundamental inquiry goes to the cumulative effect of the differences in the marks and the goods/services at issue. Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 192 U.S.P.Q. 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976). It is quite possible for no likelihood of confusion to exist even between marks which may share a term, but, as is the case here, the record shows that they nevertheless evoke different commercial impressions and/or where the respective goods and services to which the marks are applied are such that prospective customers are not likely to assume that those goods or services share a common source. Thus, although Applicant’s Mark and the Noted Marks may each incorporate the term VIPER and all cover some form of software, these facts alone are far from dispositive of a likelihood of confusion. "Per se" rules relating to likelihood of confusion have been struck down as being too inflexible as contrary to trademark law, where each case must be decided based on its own facts and circumstances. See In re Quadram Corporation, 228 U.S.P.Q. 863, 865 (TTAB 1985). In this case, differences in the marks as a whole, the notable differences in the goods and services (as amended), sophistication of the customer, channels of trade, and the overall strength (or weakness) of each mark obviates any grounds for refusal.
In view of the foregoing, it is respectfully submitted that the advisory notice/objection to registration under Section 2(d) should be withdrawn and the subject application be approved for publication.
Finally, the Examining Attorney has also requested that the Applicant amend the identification of goods and services asserting that the present identification is overbroad. Applicant accepts the Examining Attorney suggested language and agrees to the following:
IC 009. Computer hardware and peripheral devices and recorded software applications having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction and for use in analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles
IC 042. Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software platform having a graphical user interface for use in predicting radio frequency (RF) propagation loss in a real-world environment over urban, suburban, and irregular terrain types, including both flat and curved surfaces; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in performing three-dimensional analysis of surface reflection and diffraction and for use in analyzing terrain, surface materials and environmental obstacles
Accordingly, Applicant respectfully submits that the identification of goods and services is now acceptable for purposes of registration.