To: | ENTRUST CORPORATION (bgrahn@foxrothschild.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90048276 - SECURING A WORLD IN MOTION - 204293. |
Sent: | November 01, 2020 04:10:31 PM |
Sent As: | ecom124@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90048276
Mark: SECURING A WORLD IN MOTION
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: ENTRUST CORPORATION
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 204293.
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: November 01, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Identification of Goods and Services
The identification of goods and services must be amended because some of the wording is indefinite or overly broad.
Class 7
The wording “machines for . . . encoding, topping and laminating financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, secure credentials, loyalty cards, transportation cards and passports” in the identification of goods for International Class 7 must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in other international classes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. In particular, this wording could encompass “laminating machines for home or office use” in International Class 16, and “credit card encoding machines” in International Class 9. Additionally, the nature of “secure credentials” and “topping” activities are unclear. Applicant must clarify the purpose, function, and use of the goods, and classify the goods appropriately.
Class 9
In this case, “comprising one or more of the following” does not sufficiently specify the components of the systems for classification purposes. Additionally, the primary components of the systems are too broad, and could belong in more than one international class. For example, applicant specified “printers” as the first component of the systems. However, “3D printers” belong in International Class 7 and “photo printers” belong in International Class 9.
Applicant must clarify the goods by (1) describing the nature, purpose, or use of the system; and (2) listing the system’s parts or components, using common generic terms and referencing the primary parts or components of the system first. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1401.05(d), 1402.01, 1402.03(a). Additionally, this wording should be classified in the same international class as the primary parts or components of the system. See TMEP §1401.05(d).
The wording “desktop printers, and printers comprised primarily of desktop printers and embossers for printing, embossing, encoding, topping, chip programming, and laminating financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials and passports” in the identification of goods for International Class 9 must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in other international classes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. In particular, this wording could encompass “embossing machines” in International Class 7. Additionally, the type of printer provided is unclear.
A product that has a plurality of uses or aspects is ordinarily classified in a single class. Ex parte Schatz, 87 USPQ 374 (Comm’r Pats. 1950); TMEP §1401.05(c). However, if it can be shown that a product has a plurality of uses or aspects so that two or more classes apply, multiple classification may be permissible. If a product is normally classified in a particular class, an applicant cannot obtain registration in another class merely by identifying an ultimate use of the product in goods that fall in the other class.
When classification in multiple classes is appropriate, the identification must clearly indicate the basis for multiple classifications with language that is appropriate for the respective classes. Identical language cannot be used in multiple classes. For example, the USPTO will not accept the identification "clock radios," because it is unclear what the goods are and in which class the goods fall - Class 9 for radios or Class 14 for clocks. However, the applicant may adopt either or both of the following identifications - "radios incorporating clocks" in Class 9 or "clocks incorporating radios" in Class 14.
Applicant may substitute the following language, if accurate: apparatus for producing secure credentials documentation comprised of desktop document printers and embossing machines for printing, embossing, encoding, topping, chip programming, and laminating financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials and passports.
The wording “downloadable or recorded software . . .” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the format of the software is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. If applicant provides software in both downloadable and recorded formats, applicant may specify that it provides “downloadable and recorded software . . . .”
The identification for “downloadable mobile applications for authorization, authentication, encryption, decryption, identity and access management” in International Class 9 is indefinite and must be clarified because the functions are insufficient to enable a comparison of goods/services and analysis of trade channels in regard to possible likelihood-of-confusion scenarios. TMEP §1401.03(d). For example, the matter that the software authenticates is unclear. Applicant must clarify the function of the software.
International Class 16
The wording “indent printer ribbons” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the type of printer ribbons provided is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “computer printer ribbons, namely, indent printer ribbons.”
The wording “re-transfer printer ribbons” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the type of ribbon provided is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “thermal transfer ribbons, namely, re-transfer printer ribbons.”
The wording “printer roller cleaning tapes” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the type of tape provided is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “adhesive tapes for household purposes, namely, printer roller cleaning tapes.”
The wording “polyester transfer ribbon, adhesive cleaning tapes and adhesive cleaning rollers for cleaning dust and debris from cards” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the types of ribbons, tapes, and rollers are unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may incorporate the following wording, if accurate: “thermal transfer ribbons,” “adhesive tapes for household purposes,” “adhesive tape rollers for household purposes.”
International Class 17
The wording “Laminates, namely, clear and holographic polymeric topcoats and overlays for plastic cards” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the material and nature of the goods is unclear, and the intended use of the goods is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “Laminates in the nature of a clear and holographic polymeric plastic sheet coating as topcoats and overlays for use on credit cards, identification cards, membership cards, debit cards, and check cards.”
International Class 37
The wording “Technical support services, namely, technical consultation, advice, and troubleshooting in planning, migration, installation and implementation of equipment for the production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials, and passports” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the nature of the “troubleshooting” activities is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Additionally, the subject matter of the “technical consultation, advice” services is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03, 1402.11(e). As such, this wording could identify services in more than one international class. Consulting and advisory services are classified according to the subject matter of the consulting service; for example, “business management consultancy” is classified in International Class 35 and “computer technology consultancy” is classified in International Class 42. TMEP §1402.11(e). In this case, for example, if the “planning” subject matter of applicant’s services refers to “design” of equipment, these services would belong in International Class 42 rather than International Class 37.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of repair of equipment for the production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials cards, and passports; Technical support services, namely, technical consultation and advice in the installation, repair, and maintenance of equipment for the production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials cards, and passports.
The wording “technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting computer hardware repair issues” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the nature of the troubleshooting activities is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of repair of computer hardware.
International Class 42
The wording “Authentication, issuance, verification, revocation, and management of digital certificates” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the nature of the verification and management activities are unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: Computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates, and administering digital certificates.
The wording “providing online non-downloadable software for encryption, authentication, authorization, security, . . .” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the functions of the software are insufficient to enable a comparison of goods/services and analysis of trade channels in regard to possible likelihood-of-confusion scenarios. TMEP §1401.03(d). For example, the matter that the software authenticates is unclear. Applicant must clarify the function of the software.
The wording “digital certificate . . . permissions management services” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the nature of the services is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may incorporate the following wording, if accurate: “administering digital certificates, namely, digital certificate permissions management services.”
The wording “providing an online, non-downloadable cloud-based enterprise authentication platform featuring flexible authentication capabilities and a broad range of authenticators, assurance levels and access controls” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the nature and purpose of the services are unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for {specify the function of the programs, e.g., for use in authenticating digital certificates}.
The wording “computer software installation, integration and deployment services in the field of information security” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear where the software is integrated, and the nature of the deployment activities are unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: information security computer software deployment in the nature of software installation and integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks.
The wording “providing user authentication services in electronic transactions and communications” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear whether this is a technology-based service. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: User authentication services using technology for electronic transactions and communications.
The wording “software customization, installation, and support” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the nature of the support activities are unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may add the following wording, if accurate: Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems.
The wording “technical support services, namely, technical consultation, advice and troubleshooting in planning, migration and implementation of software and equipment for the production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials and passports” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the word “equipment” makes this language too broad such that it could include services in International Class 37. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Additionally, the subject matter of the “technical consultation, advice” services is unclear and could identify services in more than one international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03, 1402.11(e). Consulting and advisory services are classified according to the subject matter of the consulting service; for example, “business management consultancy” is classified in International Class 35 and “computer technology consultancy” is classified in International Class 42. TMEP §1402.11(e).
Applicant may specify that it provides “Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems for software used in the production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials cards, and passports; technical consultation and advice in the field of technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems for software used in the production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials cards, and passports.”
The wording “providing information via a website in the fields of production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials and passports” in the identification of services is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified because the wording does not adequately specify the subject matter of the services and could identify services in more than one international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03, 1402.11(b). Classification of information services is based on the subject matter of the information provided. TMEP §1402.11(b).
The following are examples of acceptable identifications for information services: “providing business information via a website” is classified in International Class 35, “providing financial information via a website” is classified in International Class 36, “providing transportation information” is classified in International Class 39, and “providing medical information” is classified in International Class 44.
Applicant may adopt the following identification in International Class 40, if accurate: Providing information via a website in the field of manufacturing services for others in the field of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials cards, and passports.
The wording “providing information regarding electronic or online fraud, electronic or online fraud behavior patterns, electronic or online fraud detection rules, electronic or online fraud detection data, methods of combating electronic or online fraud, and electronic or online fraud news, information and data via communications networks; providing information by means of online web links to other web sites for obtaining information regarding electronic or online fraud, electronic or online fraud behavior patterns, methods of combating electronic or online fraud, and electronic or online fraud news, information and data” in the identification of services is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified because the wording does not adequately specify the subject matter of the services and could identify services in more than one international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03, 1402.11(b). If these services provide information in the field of “computer security,” applicant must so specify.
Suggested Identification of Goods and Services
To address the indefinite and overly broad wording discussed above, applicant may adopt any or all of the following identification of goods, if accurate. Suggested changes are indicated in bold, strikethrough, and underlined fonts. If adding international classes, applicant must follow the multiple-class application requirements detailed below:
Electro photographic toners |
|
|
|
International Class 7: |
Machines for automatically inserting or affixing plastic cards or other objects including non-card form factors onto or into transmittal
forms; machines for inserting paper or cards onto a carrier or into an envelope for transmittal; envelope stuffing and inserting machines; envelope feeders; embossing machines; machines for laser
marking or engraving on plastic cards, plastic sheets, and chip cards; printing machines for commercial or industrial use and component parts therefor; laser engraving machines; laser marking
machines; machines for milling plastic cards and embedding integrated circuits in cards and using dies for punching plastic; machines for industrial use, namely, machines
for embossing |
|
|
International Class 9: |
Card issuance systems for financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, and secure credentials
cards comprised primarily of |
|
|
International Class 16: |
Adhesive labels; thermal and dye sublimation transfer ribbons; computer printer ribbons, namely, indent printer ribbons; thermal transfer ribbons, namely, re-transfer printer ribbons; adhesive tapes for household purposes, namely, printer roller cleaning tapes; polyester thermal transfer ribbon, adhesive cleaning tapes for household purposes and adhesive cleaning tape rollers for household purposes of cleaning dust and debris from cards. |
|
|
International Class 17: |
|
|
|
International Class 37: |
|
|
|
International Class 40: |
Providing information via a website in the field of manufacturing services for others in the field of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials cards, and passports. |
|
|
International Class 41: |
Training services in the field of information security and cybersecurity; training services in the field of production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials and passports; providing online non-downloadable videos in the fields of information security, cybersecurity, and production and issuance of financial cards, identity cards, smart cards, loyalty cards, transportation cards, secure credentials and passports. |
|
|
International Class 42: |
Computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, |
Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e).
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Multiple class application requirements
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least 9 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 8 class(es). Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Multiple-class Application webpage.
Responding to this Office action
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/April Reeves/
April E. Reeves
Examining Attorney
Law Office 124
(571) 272-3681
april.reeves@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE