PTO- 1957 |
Approved for use through 11/30/2023. OMB 0651-0050 |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 90027843 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 105 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | mark |
LITERAL ELEMENT | OSPREY |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
OWNER SECTION (current) | |
NAME | PLM Global Logistics, LLC |
MAILING ADDRESS | 526 Water Street |
CITY | Eau Claire |
STATE | Wisconsin |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 54702 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
PHONE | 715-835-5232 |
XXXX | |
OWNER SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | PLM Global Logistics, LLC |
MAILING ADDRESS | 526 Water Street |
CITY | Eau Claire |
STATE | Wisconsin |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 54702 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
PHONE | 715-835-5232 |
XXXX | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
Applicant appreciates indication that the refusal does not refer to class 19 and understands the application will proceed to publication for at least class 19. Applicant’s amended description in Class 22 overcomes the rejection in light of the differences in the respective goods, lack of evidence of relatedness of the particular straps with respect to boats or fishing boats, etc., and also in light of the coexistence of the registered marks of record of OSPREY and OSPREY ROCKY MOUNT CORD CO. (and design), and the registered mark OSPREY in class 22 for “Canopies comprised primarily of tensile fabric membranes.” (U.S. Reg. No. 4,705,360)(TESS Sheet attached as Exhibit A). The coexistence of these registered marks demonstrates consumers are able to differentiate among the respective marks as applied to the related and/or unrelated goods, despite have a common term. Moreover, viewing the marks in their entireties, as is required, includes addressing all elements of a mark, including the disclaimed portions and graphics and style. While ROCKY MOUNT CORD CO. may be disclaimed, it is improper to ignore those terms. Shen Mfg. v. Ritz Hotel, Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 73 USPQ2d 1350, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (“The disclaimed elements of a mark, however, are relevant to the assessment of similarity … This is so because confusion is evaluated from the perspective of the purchasing public, which is not aware that certain words or phrases have been disclaimed.”). These terms and the Design/style elements also contribute to the overall commercial impression of the mark, and further work to dispel confusion. Because the marks on their face or so different, and combined with the different elements and differences in goods, the DuPont factors strongly favor Applicant, and withdrawal of the rejection is warranted. |
|
EVIDENCE SECTION | |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_474114463-20210316171 358026646_._Exhibit_A.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (1 page) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\900\278\90027843\xml4\ ROA0002.JPG |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | Exhibit A as referred to in the Argument |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (019) (no change) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (022) (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 022 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Bungee cords; ropes not of metal; all-purpose nylon straps; mooring cables not of metal; ropes for marine use; anchoring ropes | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (022) (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 022 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
FINAL DESCRIPTION | All-purpose nylon straps |
WEBPAGE URL | None Provided |
WEBPAGE DATE OF ACCESS | None Provided |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | ANTHONY J. BOURGET |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | abourget@bourgetlaw.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | administrator@bourgetlaw.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 2733.0006 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Anthony J. Bourget |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | abourget@bourgetlaw.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | administrator@bourgetlaw.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 2733.0006 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /anthony j. bourget/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Anthony J. Bourget |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, Wisconsin Bar Member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 715-835-5232 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/16/2021 |
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | Authorized U.S.-Licensed Attorney |
SIGNATURE METHOD | Signed directly within the form |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Tue Mar 16 17:27:40 ET 2021 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XXX.XX-20 210316172740216987-900278 43-770606c2d65cb339424e48 66c275682866f7e39da6cec83 1649a49ca1833c4322-N/A-N/ A-20210316171358026646 |
PTO- 1957 |
Approved for use through 11/30/2023. OMB 0651-0050 |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number |
Applicant appreciates indication that the refusal does not refer to class 19 and understands the application will proceed to publication for at least class 19.
Applicant’s amended description in Class 22 overcomes the rejection in light of the differences in the respective goods, lack of evidence of relatedness of the particular straps with respect to boats or fishing boats, etc., and also in light of the coexistence of the registered marks of record of OSPREY and OSPREY ROCKY MOUNT CORD CO. (and design), and the registered mark OSPREY in class 22 for “Canopies comprised primarily of tensile fabric membranes.” (U.S. Reg. No. 4,705,360)(TESS Sheet attached as Exhibit A). The coexistence of these registered marks demonstrates consumers are able to differentiate among the respective marks as applied to the related and/or unrelated goods, despite have a common term.
Moreover, viewing the marks in their entireties, as is required, includes addressing all elements of a mark, including the disclaimed portions and graphics and style. While ROCKY MOUNT CORD CO. may be disclaimed, it is improper to ignore those terms. Shen Mfg. v. Ritz Hotel, Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 73 USPQ2d 1350, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (“The disclaimed elements of a mark, however, are relevant to the assessment of similarity … This is so because confusion is evaluated from the perspective of the purchasing public, which is not aware that certain words or phrases have been disclaimed.”). These terms and the Design/style elements also contribute to the overall commercial impression of the mark, and further work to dispel confusion. Because the marks on their face or so different, and combined with the different elements and differences in goods, the DuPont factors strongly favor Applicant, and withdrawal of the rejection is warranted.