To: | Elite Squad USA LLC (smg@nqgrg.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90025838 - ELITE - N/A |
Sent: | August 17, 2020 11:46:14 AM |
Sent As: | ecom124@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90025838
Mark: ELITE
|
|
Correspondence Address: NEUBERGER QUINN GIELEN RUBIN AND GIBBER
|
|
Applicant: Elite Squad USA LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 17, 2020
IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES
In general, commas should be used in an identification (1) to separate a series of related items identified within a particular category of goods or services, (2) before and after “namely,” and (3) between each item in a list of goods or services following “namely” (e.g., personal care products, namely, body lotion, bar soap, shampoo). Id. Semicolons generally should be used to separate a series of distinct categories of goods or services within an international class (e.g., personal care products, namely, body lotion; deodorizers for pets; glass cleaners). Id.
Here, applicant should not sort its goods with (a) and (b) then (i) and (ii) etc.
In an identification, an applicant must use the common commercial or generic name for the goods, be specific and all-inclusive, and avoid using indefinite words or phrases. TMEP§§1402.01, 1402.03(a). Further, applicant may amend the identification to list only those items that are within the scope of the goods set forth in the initial application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07. Scope is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §1402.07(a).
Finally, wholesale services are classified in International Class 35.
Applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate:
“Accessories for new, and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned cellphones and tablets, namely, support brackets made of metal for attachment to furniture to support cell phones to be kept in hands reach,” in International Class 6;
“Cellular phones, namely, new, and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned cellphones; accessories for new, and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned cellphones and tablets, namely, {specify e.g. Cell phone auxiliary cables},” in International Class 9;
“Wholesale services by direct solicitation by sales agents featuring new, and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned, electronic appliances and devices, namely cellphones, and accessories for new and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned cellphones and tablets, namely, cell phone auxiliary cables; Wholesale store services featuring new, and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned, electronic appliances and devices, namely cellphones, and accessories for new and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned cellphones and tablets, namely, cell phone auxiliary cables; Wholesale distributorships featuring new, and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned, electronic appliances and devices, namely cellphones, and accessories for new and recycled, refurbished and reconditioned cellphones and tablets, namely, cell phone auxiliary cables,” in International Class 35.
An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the goods. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTI-CLASS ADVISORY
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least three classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only one class(es). Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Multiple-class Application webpage.
MARK DESCRIPTION
The mark description includes a redundancy which should be deleted so the description is more concise. TMEP §808.02.
The mark consists of The mark consists of two wings and a five pointed crown situated above the word "Elite". The
letters 'e', 'l', 't' and 'e' of the word "Elite" are in the same font, and the letter 'i' of the word "Elite" is comprised of three (3) vertical lines of equal length. The letter 't' of the word
"Elite" is somewhat off-center with the vertical base of the letter not striking the exact center of the horizontal top of the letter.
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Chris Reams/
Chris Reams
Examining Attorney
Law Office 124
571-272-7815
Christopher.reams@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE