PTO Form No Form Number (Rev 01/2012) |
OMB No. 0651-0061 (Exp 09/30/2021) |
Request for Reinstatement
The table below presents the data as entered.
Input Field
|
Entered
|
SERIAL NUMBER |
88824557 |
MARK SECTION |
MARK FILE NAME |
|
LITERAL ELEMENT |
MDRX |
FORM TEXT |
On May 21, 2020 USPTO issued a "Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application",
http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/documentviewer?caseId=sn88824557&docId=OOA20200521#docIndex=1&page=1&tdrlink= . It said, "Applicant must clarify whether color is a feature of the mark
because, although the drawing shows the mark in color, the application does not state whether color is a feature of the mark.” This was incorrect. The mark was simply the letters
MDRX. The reviewer was apparently confused because the sample submitted to prove use of the mark in commerce was a stylized, colored “MDRX”. The mark was never intended to be limited by
the sample.
USPTO’s Office Action informed me, “Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action."
In reliance on that instruction, on 05/21/2020 (the same day) I sent the following email to the examining attorney, Jared.Mason@uspto.gov:
/Jared M. Mason/ Trademark Examining Attorney
I read the letter your email forwarded to me, found at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/documentviewer?caseId=sn88824557&docId=OOA20200521#docIndex=0&page=1&tdrlink=
I thought the original application explained things. The trademark consists of the consecutive letters "mdrx". It is independent of the font color, style, size, caps/lower case etc.
used. The intent is to cover MDRX, mdrx, MDRx, etc. in any and all forms. The reason for including the stylized, color MDRX in the initial application was not to limit the trademark but
to provide an example of it actually being used in commerce. If you would be so kind as to suggest how to word this in acceptable language, I will amend the application accordingly.
Thank you for your kind assistance. Sincerely, F. Mark Hansen
My query to Mr. Mason clarified his confusion about the mark. However, Mr. Mason never contacted me to answer my email query. I considered the matter clarified to his
satisfaction.
I respectfully submit that the 05/21/2020 “Office Action” was USPTO error because color was never a feature of the mark. The above Office Action even admits, “The mark was simply the
letters MDRX.” That is correct. There was no need for clarification. The mark is and always was simply the letters MDRX.
The original application was completed correctly. It was USPTO’s original error in misconstruing the sample as a limitation on the mark, as described, that precipitated what followed.
|
FORM
FILE NAME(S) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\888\245\88824557\xml8\ RRI0002.jpg |
Owner Information (Current) |
NAME |
Desert Leasing & Licensing LLC |
MAILING ADDRESS |
1995 W Alexander Street |
CITY |
West Valley City |
STATE |
Utah |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE |
84119 |
PHONE |
801-975-7272 |
EMAIL |
XXXX |
Owner Information (Proposed) |
NAME |
Desert Leasing & Licensing LLC |
MAILING ADDRESS |
1995 W Alexander Street |
CITY |
West Valley City |
STATE |
Utah |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE |
84119 |
PHONE |
801-975-7272 |
EMAIL |
XXXX |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (current) |
NAME |
F. Mark Hansen |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER |
XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION |
XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY |
XX |
FIRM NAME |
F. MARK HANSEN, P.C. |
STREET |
431 NORTH 1300 WEST |
CITY |
SALT LAKE CITY |
STATE |
Utah |
POSTAL CODE |
84116 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
PHONE |
801-517-3530 |
EMAIL |
fmhlaw@comcast.net |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (proposed) |
NAME |
F. Mark Hansen |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER |
XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION |
XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY |
XX |
FIRM NAME |
F. MARK HANSEN, P.C. |
STREET |
431 NORTH 1300 WEST |
CITY |
SALT LAKE CITY |
STATE |
Utah |
POSTAL CODE |
84116 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
PHONE |
801-517-3530 |
EMAIL |
fmhlaw@comcast.net |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) |
NAME |
F. Mark Hansen |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE |
fmhlaw@comcast.net |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) |
NOT PROVIDED |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) |
NAME |
F. Mark Hansen |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE |
fmhlaw@comcast.net |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) |
NOT PROVIDED |
REASON FOR REINSTATEMENT |
I am requesting reinstatement of my application. I have attached other evidence, or factual information supported by a declaration
demonstrating Office error in abandoning the application. |
SIGNATURE SECTION |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE |
/F. Mark Hansen/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME |
F. Mark Hansen |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
attorney of record |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER |
801-517-3530 |
DATE SIGNED |
12/15/2020 |
SUBMISSION SIGNATURE |
/F. Mark Hansen/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME |
F. Mark Hansen |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
attorney of record |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER |
801-517-3530 |
DATE SIGNED |
12/15/2020 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY |
YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION |
SUBMIT DATE |
Tue Dec 15 12:30:38 ET 2020 |
TEAS STAMP |
USPTO/RRI-XXXX:XXX:XXXX:X
XX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX-20
201215123038386083-888245
57-20201215114941577352-N
/A-N/A-202012151149415773
52 |
PTO Form No Form Number (Rev 01/2012) |
OMB No. 0651-0061 (Exp 09/30/2021) |
Request for Reinstatement
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
The following is submitted for application serial number:
88824557
FORM TEXT:
On May 21, 2020 USPTO issued a "Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application",
http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/documentviewer?caseId=sn88824557&docId=OOA20200521#docIndex=1&page=1&tdrlink= . It said, "Applicant must clarify whether color is a feature of the mark
because, although the drawing shows the mark in color, the application does not state whether color is a feature of the mark.” This was incorrect. The mark was simply the letters
MDRX. The reviewer was apparently confused because the sample submitted to prove use of the mark in commerce was a stylized, colored “MDRX”. The mark was never intended to be limited by
the sample.
USPTO’s Office Action informed me, “Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action."
In reliance on that instruction, on 05/21/2020 (the same day) I sent the following email to the examining attorney, Jared.Mason@uspto.gov:
/Jared M. Mason/ Trademark Examining Attorney
I read the letter your email forwarded to me, found at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/documentviewer?caseId=sn88824557&docId=OOA20200521#docIndex=0&page=1&tdrlink=
I thought the original application explained things. The trademark consists of the consecutive letters "mdrx". It is independent of the font color, style, size, caps/lower case etc.
used. The intent is to cover MDRX, mdrx, MDRx, etc. in any and all forms. The reason for including the stylized, color MDRX in the initial application was not to limit the trademark but
to provide an example of it actually being used in commerce. If you would be so kind as to suggest how to word this in acceptable language, I will amend the application accordingly.
Thank you for your kind assistance. Sincerely, F. Mark Hansen
My query to Mr. Mason clarified his confusion about the mark. However, Mr. Mason never contacted me to answer my email query. I considered the matter clarified to his
satisfaction.
I respectfully submit that the 05/21/2020 “Office Action” was USPTO error because color was never a feature of the mark. The above Office Action even admits, “The mark was simply the
letters MDRX.” That is correct. There was no need for clarification. The mark is and always was simply the letters MDRX.
The original application was completed correctly. It was USPTO’s original error in misconstruing the sample as a limitation on the mark, as described, that precipitated what followed.
FORM FILE NAME(S):
Form File1
REASON FOR REINSTATEMENT
I am requesting reinstatement of my application. I have attached other evidence, or factual information supported by a declaration demonstrating Office error in abandoning the application.
The
owner proposes to amend the following:
Current: Desert Leasing & Licensing LLC, having an address of
1995 W Alexander Street
West Valley City, Utah 84119
United States
Phone: 801-975-7272
Email Address: XXXX
Proposed: Desert Leasing & Licensing LLC, having an address of
1995 W Alexander Street
West Valley City, Utah 84119
United States
Phone: 801-975-7272
Email Address: XXXX
The owner's/holder's current attorney information: F. Mark Hansen. F. Mark Hansen of F. MARK HANSEN, P.C., is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, is
located at
431 NORTH 1300 WEST
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84116
United States
The phone number is 801-517-3530.
The email address is fmhlaw@comcast.net
The owner's/holder's proposed attorney information: F. Mark Hansen. F. Mark Hansen of F. MARK HANSEN, P.C., is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, is
located at
431 NORTH 1300 WEST
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84116
United States
The phone number is 801-517-3530.
The email address is fmhlaw@comcast.net
Correspondence Information (current):
F. Mark Hansen
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: fmhlaw@comcast.net
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
Correspondence Information (proposed):
F. Mark Hansen
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: fmhlaw@comcast.net
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
Requirement for Email and Electronic Filing: I understand that a valid email address must be maintained by the applicant owner/holder and the applicant owner's/holder's attorney, if appointed,
and that all official trademark correspondence must be submitted via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).
SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature
The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may
jeopardize the validity of the application, submission, or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that the facts set forth above are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are
true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
Signature: /F. Mark Hansen/ Date: 12/15/2020
Signatory's Name: F. Mark Hansen
Signatory's Position: attorney of record
Signatory's Phone Number: 801-517-3530
Submission Signature
Signature: /F. Mark Hansen/ Date: 12/15/2020
Signatory's Name: F. Mark Hansen
Signatory's Position: attorney of record
Signatory's Phone Number: 801-517-3530
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and
any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another
U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed
revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter;
or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.
Mailing Address: F. Mark Hansen
F. MARK HANSEN, P.C.
431 NORTH 1300 WEST
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84116
Mailing Address: F. Mark Hansen
F. MARK HANSEN, P.C.
431 NORTH 1300 WEST
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84116
Serial Number: 88824557
Internet Transmission Date: Tue Dec 15 12:30:38 ET 2020
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RRI-XXXX:XXX:XXXX:XXX:XXXX:XXXX:XX
XX:XXXX-20201215123038386083-88824557-20
201215114941577352-N/A-N/A-2020121511494
1577352