To: | ReplyApp Inc. (jdavenport@jmdattorney.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88805989 - REPLY.IO - N/A |
Sent: | September 09, 2020 09:23:38 AM |
Sent As: | ecom120@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88805989
Mark: REPLY.IO
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: ReplyApp Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: September 09, 2020
The Office received applicant’s communication filed on July 28, 2020. The identification of services and specimen requirements have been satisfied.
The application is suspended for the reason specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending applications below have earlier filing dates or effective filing dates than applicant’s application. If a mark in the applications below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed applications below either register or abandon. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the applications below was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial Nos. 88761279, 87680560, and 87680555
U.S. Application Serial No. 88602116 has abandoned and no longer presents a potential bar to registration.
In the response, applicant argues that confusion is unlikely because the mark is weak and diluted. This argument is unpersuasive. Although other trademarks may feature the word “REPLY,” the services in the present applications include software that perform highly similar functions. Applicant provides software for sales engagement and automation of communications. The applicants in the pending applications provide similar types of software for wireless communication, marketing automation, email marketing, messaging, customer relationship management, and a variety of sales functions. Additionally, applicant’s mark is comprised of only the term “REPLY” and a generic top-level domain. So, consumers are more likely to be confused as to the source of applicant’s services and the services provided in the pending applications.
To make third party registrations part of the record, an applicant must submit copies of the registrations, or the complete electronic equivalent from the USPTO’s automated systems, prior to appeal. In re Star Belly Stitcher, Inc., 107 USPQ2d 2059, 2064 (TTAB 2013); TBMP §1208.02; TMEP §710.03. Accordingly, these registrations will not be considered.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Clare Cahill/
Clare Cahill
Examining Attorney
Law Office 120
571-272-5218
Clare.Cahill@uspto.gov