To: | Harley J Lake (powderjunkiesclothingco@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88792071 - POWDER JUNKIES CLOTHING CO EST 2020 - N/A |
Sent: | April 22, 2020 02:22:47 PM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88792071
Mark: POWDER JUNKIES CLOTHING CO EST 2020
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Harley J Lake
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: April 22, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH RESULTS
MARK DESCRIPTION AND COLOR CLAIM
.Applicant must clarify whether color is a feature of the mark. Although the drawing shows the mark in color and the mark description includes references to color, the application does not claim color as a feature of the mark. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1), 2.61(b); see TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii). It is noted that the applicant states the overall color of the logo will change depending on the material and color of material it is being printed on. Please note that the applicant may wish to amend to a black and white drawing, then the applicant may use the mark in any color, as suggested below. If, however, the applicant determines that color is a feature of the mark, the colors depicted in the mark must always match the mark description.
Applicant may respond to this requirement by satisfying one of the following:
(1) If color is not a feature of the mark, applicant must submit a black-and-white drawing of the mark to replace the color drawing. See TMEP §807.07(a)(i). However, any other amendments to the drawing will not be accepted if they materially alter the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.72; see TMEP §§807.14 et seq. Applicant must also submit a revised description of all literal and design elements in the mark, deleting any reference to color, if appropriate. 37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02. The following description is suggested, if accurate: The mark consists of the stylized wording “POWDER JUNKIES CLOTHING CO EST 2020” with the two “0” digits x’ed out around a skull wearing a winter beanie and snow goggles with pine trees reflected on the lens of the goggles.
(2) If color is a feature of the mark, applicant must submit a statement (a) listing all the colors that are claimed as a feature of the mark and (b) describing all the literal and design elements in the mark that specifies where each color appears in those elements. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii). Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., red, yellow, blue. TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(ii). If black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark, applicant must so specify in the description. See TMEP §807.07(d). The following color claim and description are suggested, if accurate:
Color claim: “The colors black, white, and orange are claimed as a feature of the mark.”
Description: “The mark consists of the stylized wording “POWDER JUNKIES CLOTHING CO EST 2020” in black with the two “0” digits x’ed out around a black and white skull wearing a black winter beanie with white accents and black snow goggles with black pine trees reflected on the orange lens of the goggles.”
See TMEP §807.07(b).
ENTITY INDEFINITE
If applicant is an individual, applicant should simply request that the legal entity be amended to “individual” and must indicate his/her country of citizenship for the record. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(b)(3)(i); TMEP §803.03(a). Alternatively, if applicant is a limited liability company, applicant must provide the correct name of the limited liability company and the U.S. state or foreign country of incorporation or organization. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §803.03(h).
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration may be refused because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
DISCLAIMER
“CLOTHING” is encompassed by applicant’s identification of goods. Thus, the wording merely describes applicant’s goods because CLOTHING simply indicates the types of goods that applicant provides, e.g. hats, t-shirts, hoodies, etc.
Determining whether a term functions as a trademark or service mark depends on how such matter would be perceived by the relevant public. In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Aerospace Optics, Inc., 78 USPQ2d at 1862; TMEP §1202.04. “The more commonly a [term] is used, the less likely that the public will use it to identify only one source and the less likely that it will be recognized by purchasers as a trademark [or service mark].” In re Hulting, 107 USPQ2d 1175, 1177 (TTAB 2013) (quoting In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d at 1229); TMEP §1202.04.
This term is commonly used by businesses in the clothing field as informational material. Because consumers are accustomed to seeing this term commonly used by many businesses in the clothing field to impart information to consumers, they will perceive this term or slogan only as informational matter rather than as a trademark that identifies the source of applicant’s goods.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “CLOTHING CO” and “EST 2020” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
ASSISTANCE
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Lee, Sang
/Sang Lee/
Examining Attorney
LO111
(571) 270-7526
Sang.Lee@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE