To: | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (trademarks@bsci.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88770680 - HAWKEYE - TM-01011US01 |
Sent: | February 18, 2020 11:09:05 AM |
Sent As: | ecom112@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88770680
Mark: HAWKEYE
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. TM-01011US01
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: February 18, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Applicant is encouraged to contact the examining attorney via email and/or telephone to resolve this matter via Examiner’s Amendment.
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
The identification of services must be clarified in a manner such that the nature of the services are clear for notice and classification purposes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Indicating applicant is “providing” something clarifies the applicant is providing a service rather than a good.
Applicant may adopt the following if accurate, with changes in bold, guidance in brackets and strikethroughs representing deleted language:
International Class 042: “Feature of web-based, Providing online non-downloadable software that provides care coordination between medical professionals and patients for implantable cardiology devices”
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Keisha M. Hardley Jenkins/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 112
571-272-6945
Keisha.Hardley@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE