To: | Lincoln Global, Inc. (ip@lincolnelectric.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88760131 - TOPTIG - TM 2017-227 |
Sent: | April 02, 2020 09:04:28 AM |
Sent As: | ecom126@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88760131
Mark: TOPTIG
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Lincoln Global, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. TM 2017-227
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: April 02, 2020
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS: The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
I. INFORMATION REQUIRED – SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MARK
(1) Explain whether any of the wording “TOPTIG”, including the component terms “TOP” and “TIG”, in the mark has any meaning or significance in the trade or industry in which applicant’s goods are manufactured or provided, any meaning or significance as applied to applicant’s goods, or if such wording is a term of art within applicant’s industry.
(2) Respond to the following questions:
Do applicant’s goods permit welding filler metal to be fed, or otherwise introduced, from the top of a welding torch, welding torch nozzle, welding torch head, welding arc, or weld pool? Please see the attached evidence from applicant’s website, LincolnElectric.com.
Do applicant’s goods permit welding filler metal to be fed, or otherwise introduced, from above a welding torch, welding torch nozzle, welding torch head, welding arc, or weld pool? Please see the attached evidence from applicant’s website, LincolnElectric.com.
See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.
II. AMENDMENT REQUIRED – IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Indefinite Wording in Identification
Suggested Wording for Identification
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate (note that added text is indicated with bold type, deleted text is indicated with a strike through, and suggested text is indicated with braces):
“Welding torches; welding torch tips; welding torch heads; nozzles for welding torches; robot welding torches for industrial welding robots; robotic welding torch tips for industrial welding robots; robotic welding torch heads for industrial
welding robots; nozzles for robotic welding torches welding torch nozzles for industrial welding robots” in International Class 7.
Advisories – ID Manual and Scope of Amendments
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e).
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Click HERE to file a response to this non-final Office action
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
/Carl A. Konschak/
Carl A. Konschak, Esq.
Examining Attorney
Law Office 126
(571) 270-3878
carl.konschak@uspto.gov