Notation to File

YES

FRIEDWHEAT INC

Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88750228

DATE:                                09/01/2020

NAME:                               gmurray1

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search       X   Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

     OTHER:

Completely acceptable. Thank you for the reminder and suggestion. We are OK with proceeding with an Examiner’s amendment. Thank you, George.

 

Greg 

 

 

From: "Murray Jr., George" <George.Murray@USPTO.GOV>
Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 10:54 AM
To: "Nelson@weeksnelson.com" <nelson@weeksnelson.com>
Cc: Weeks Nelson IP <ip@weeksnelson.com>
Subject: RE: YES applications (Serial Nos. 88/750,228 and 88/750,242)

 

Hi Greg,

 

Thank you for the message. With the prior registration – 4,670,521 being canceled the only outstanding issue in both of the applications is the mark description requirement. This is an issue we can fix over email. I would just need your permission to amend the mark descriptions to the suggested language below:

 

For SN 88750242: The mark consists of the stylized letters “y” in purple fading to red and orange, “e” in orange fading to yellow, and “s” in yellow fading to orange and purple with a divided heart shape solid red on the right half and the left half outlined in red with a centered red dot on a white background located between and at the base of the letters “e” and “s” and the stylized words "How it all begins." in purple underneath. The remaining color white in the mark is merely background and not a claimed feature.

 

For SN 88750228: The mark consists of the stylized letters “y” in purple fading to red and orange, “e” in orange fading to yellow, and “s” in yellow fading to orange and purple with a divided heart shape solid red on the right half and the left half outlined in red with a centered red dot on a white background located between and at the base of the letters “e” and “s”. The remaining color white in the mark is merely background and not a claimed feature.

 

If these amendments are acceptable I will get them entered with an examiner’s amendment and keep the marks moving forward to publication. 

 

Best,

 

/George Murray/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 121

(571) 270-5101

George.Murray@uspto.gov

 

From: Greg Nelson <nelson@weeksnelson.com>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 7:32 PM
To: Murray Jr., George <George.Murray@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Weeks Nelson IP <ip@weeksnelson.com>
Subject: YES applications (Serial Nos. 88/750,228 and 88/750,242)

 

Mr. Murray,

 

I represent the applicant, Friedwheat, in the two applications above. Both were refused based on the prior registration – 4,670,521. We successfully cancelled that mark. For your ease, please see:

http://ttabvue.gov.uspto.report/ttabvue/v?qt=adv&procstatus=All&pno=&propno=4670521&qs=&propnameop=&propname=&pop=&pn=&pop2=&pn2=&cop=&cn=

 

Based on this cancelation, it would appear that the grounds for refusal is now moot. Do you want us to submit a response to the Office Action based on this, or is it possible to move in an easier means, such as a withdrawal of the office action refusal? We will follow whatever advice you suggest.

 

Thank you in advance, and please feel free to call or email me with any questions.

 

Greg Nelson

 

 

 

Gregory Nelson

WEEKS NELSON

17065 Via Del Campo, Suite 101

San Diego, CA 92127

O:(858) 794-2140

D: (858) 794-2143

Fax: (858) 794-2141

E: nelson@weeksnelson.com

 

         Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 88750242

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed