To: | Nolk Enterprises Inc. (vk@kasterlegal.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88686048 - KELVIN - N/A |
Sent: | December 20, 2019 03:21:41 PM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88686048
Mark: KELVIN
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Nolk Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 20, 2019
SUMMARY OF ISSUES APPLICANT MUST ADDRESS:
Please also note the advisory detailed below regarding a potential Section 2(d) refusal.
REQUIREMENT - IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS.
Second, the wording “insulated tumblers” and “tumblers” in the identification of goods for International Class 021 must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in other international classes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.
Please note that the remaining goods and/or services recited in the identification are acceptable without further amendment.
Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate. Please note that the wording subject to this requirement and the suggested changes made by the trademark examining attorney appear in bold.
Table cutlery; Folding table cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons (Class 008)
Portable thermoelectric cooling containers for food and beverages (Class 011)
Backpacks; tote bags (Class 018)
Insulated tumblers for use as drinking glasses; Insulated containers for beverages; Tumblers for use as drinking glasses; Bottles sold empty for holding liquids; Jugs; Cups; Canteens for holding liquids; Drinking flasks for holding liquids; Non-electric portable food and beverage coolers; Temperature - retaining drinking vessels; Thermal insulated bags for food or beverages; Kitchen containers; Lunch boxes; Insulated lunch boxes; Glassware, namely, food containers used with lunch boxes; Removable glass liner for use with lunch boxes; Lunch bags not of paper; Insulated lunch bags not of paper; Non-electric coffee presses; Pour-over coffee filters not of paper for brewing coffee; Non-electric, pour-over coffee brewers; Hand operated coffee grinders; Reusable fruit infusers designed to be placed in a variety of pitchers, sport bottles, and containers which are designed to carry liquids such as water, tea, and alcohol; Tea filters not of paper; Chopsticks (Class 021)
Locking bags, namely, bags for securing valuables (Class 022)
If applicant needs to add an additional class to the application as a result of this requirement, please see the multi-class requirements detailed below.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Notice. Although identifications of goods and/or services may be amended to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, adding to or broadening the scope of the goods and/or services is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07. Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods and/or services that are not within the scope of the goods and/or services set forth in the present identification.
Multi-class application requirements. The application identifies goods and/or services in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in more than 5 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 5 class(es). Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
If applicant chooses to respond to the foregoing refusal(s)/requirements, then applicant should note the following advisory(ies).
ADVISORY – POTENTIAL SECTION 2(D) REFUSAL – PRIOR PENDING APPLICATION. The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTO’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no similar registered marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). However, a mark in a prior-filed pending application may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark.
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the marks in the referenced applications. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
ASSISTANCE. If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
HOW TO RESPOND. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Deirdre G. Robertson/
Deirdre G. Robertson
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 111
571-272-8806
deirdre.robertson@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE: