Offc Action Outgoing

PEP

Inteleos, Inc.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88665412 - PEP - 3012.1620000

To: Inteleos, Inc. (tm@sternekessler.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88665412 - PEP - 3012.1620000
Sent: February 10, 2020 05:35:08 PM
Sent As: ecom119@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88665412

 

Mark:  PEP

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

MONICA RIVA TALLEY

STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C

1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, DC 20005

 

 

 

Applicant:  Inteleos, Inc.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 3012.1620000

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 tm@sternekessler.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  February 10, 2020

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES

 

·         Identification of Services Requirement

·         Amended Certification Statement Required

 

IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES REQUIREMENT

 

Applicant must identify with greater specificity the services intended to be certified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.45(a)(2); TMEP §1306.02(c).  The application lists the services as follows:  “Training programs and educational courses in the field of medical training and use of ultrasound equipment.”  This is not sufficiently specific because the identification does not specify the field of the medical training, e.g, ultrasounds.  Moreover, it does not specify whether the ultrasound equipment is “point of care” ultrasound equipment.  In addition, applicant should remove “training programs and educational courses” as it is redundant with “medical training.”

 

The identification of services must describe the services of the party who will receive the certification rather than the activities of the certifying organization.  TMEP §1306.02(c).  General kinds of goods and services, such as “produce,” “beef,” “fabric,” “dry cleaning services,” or “dental services,” are usually acceptable.  However, if the certification program itself is limited to specific services, then the identification in the application should be more specific.  Id.  The identification should generally not include the wording “certification,” “certify,” or “certifies.”  Id.

 

The identification of services being certified is different from the certification statement that specifies what aspect of the services is being certified (e.g., that the work performed was done by a union, that the goods come from a particular geographic place, that the goods or services are of a specified quality).  See TMEP §§1306.02(c), 1306.03(a).

 

Applicant may adopt the following amended identification, if accurate, changes are shown in bold:

 

IC B:   Medical training in the field of ultrasounds, use of point of care ultrasound equipment, and interpretation of diagnostic medical ultrasound technology

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the services, but not to broaden or expand the services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

AMENDED CERTIFICATION STATEMENT REQUIRED

 

Applicant must amend the certification statement, the statement in the application that specifies what the applicant is certifying or will be certifying about the services, to state with greater specificity the features or characteristics of the services that are or will be certified.  See TMEP §1306.03(a). 

 

Specifically, the statement should be amended to state that the medical training is specifically in the field of “ultrasounds”.  In addition, the certification statement should state that the ultrasound equipment and technology is specifically “point of care” ultrasound equipment and technology.

 

The certification statement should specify all the characteristics or features of the services that the mark certifies or is intended to certify.  TMEP §1306.03(a).  A mark does not have to be limited to certifying a single characteristic or feature.  Id.  The characteristics or features that the mark certifies or is intended to certify should be explained in reasonable detail.  Terms such as “quality,” “mode of manufacture,” or “excellence” should not be used without further explanation because they are too broad and do not accurately reveal what characteristics or features are being certified or intended to be certified.  Id.

 

The following format is suggested, if accurate, changes are shown in bold:

 

The certification mark, as intended to be used by persons authorized by the certifier, is intended to certify the certificants have met the educational, professional, and testing requirements established by the certifier for medical training in the field of ultrasounds, use of point of care ultrasound equipment, and interpretation of diagnostic point of care medical ultrasound technology.

 

To provide the certification statement in the TEAS response form:  Answer “yes” to TEAS wizard question #3; under the “Additional Statement(s)” section, check the box next to “Miscellaneous Statement;” and enter the certification statement in the text box below.

 

TELEPHONE/E-MAIL RESOLUTION SUGGESTED

 

Applicant is encouraged to call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney below to resolve the issues in this Office action.  Although the USPTO will not accept an email as a response to an Office action, an applicant can communicate by phone or email to agree to a proposed amendment to the application that will immediately place the application in condition for publication, registration, or suspension.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.62(c); TMEP §707.

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

/Jared M. Mason/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 119

(571) 272-4146

Jared.Mason@uspto.gov

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88665412 - PEP - 3012.1620000

To: Inteleos, Inc. (tm@sternekessler.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88665412 - PEP - 3012.1620000
Sent: February 10, 2020 05:35:08 PM
Sent As: ecom119@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on February 10, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88665412

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Jared M. Mason/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 119

(571) 272-4146

Jared.Mason@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from February 10, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed