Offc Action Outgoing

ARMATECK

Ferguson Enterprises, LLC

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88662910 - ARMATECK - N/A

To: Ferguson Enterprises, LLC (wpoynter@kaleolegal.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88662910 - ARMATECK - N/A
Sent: December 03, 2019 02:53:07 PM
Sent As: ecom114@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88662910

 

Mark:  ARMATECK

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

WILLIAM RUEGER POYNTER

KALEO LEGAL

4456 CORPORATION LANE

SUITE 135

VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462

 

 

Applicant:  Ferguson Enterprises, LLC

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 wpoynter@kaleolegal.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  December 03, 2019

 

 The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

SEARCH CONDUCTED

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

ACCEPTABLE IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES REQUIRED

 

Applicant has elected to use wording in the identification of goods and/or services that is not found in the U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  The wording that applicant has chosen to use instead does not meet the standards set forth in the Manual and is unacceptable.  Specifically, the following underlined wording in the identification of goods and/or services is indefinite and must be clarified as set forth below.  See TMEP §1402.01.  The exact nature of the goods and/or services cannot be determined from this wording. 

 

Class 3

Eye wash stations [This wording broadly encompasses goods in other classes, such as a type of fixture featuring non-medicated eye washes. The nature of the “stations” must be specified.]

 

Class 9

Protective clothing, namely, disposable coveralls [As noted in the ID Manual, protective clothing in Class 9 is clothing that is life preserving or protects from fire, accidents and irradiation. A “life-preserving” or “protection against accidents” use or purpose must be indicated for any Class 9 protective clothing or protective headgear ID. For example, “protective clothing, namely, bullet resistant vests” or “protective clothing, namely, disposable coveralls for protection against ____” would both be acceptable in Class 9, because the referenced items may prevent potentially life-threatening injury to the body and head, respectively.]; dust masks; eye covers for protective purposes; fall protection products [The type of products must be specified as noted in the ID Manual, for example, “fall protection equipment for fall restraint and fall arrest, namely, lines.”]; fire resistant clothing [See previous comment and ID Manual. Note that clothing treated with fire retardants are classified in Class 25, for example, “Clothing for babies, toddlers and children, treated with fire and heat retardants, namely, pajamas, jackets, shirts, pants, jumpers.”]; protective work gloves; protective helmets; hard hats; cooling clothing [Specify the type of clothing within the correct class.]; reflective safety vests; high visibility vests [Clarify what is meant by “high visibility” as noted in the ID Manual, for example, “reflective safety vests.” Note that only clothing with a specific protective purpose must be specified for the goods to be classified in Class 9.]; knee pads for workers; warming clothing [The type of clothing must be specified.]

 

Class 10

Hearing protectors without the ability to reproduce or transmit sound 

 

Class 21

Work gloves; disposable latex and nitrile gloves for general use 

 

Class 25

Footwear, namely, work boots; rainwear 

 

 

Applicant must amend this wording to specify the common commercial or generic name for the goods and/or services.  If there is no common commercial or generic name for the goods and/or services, then applicant must describe the nature of the goods and/or services as well as their main purpose, channels of trade, and the intended consumer(s).  See TMEP §1402.01.

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.

 

It is the applicant’s duty to identify the goods and/or services, and any goods and/or services deleted from the application by amendment may not be reinserted at a later point in prosecution.  TMEP §1402.01(e). 

 

Applicant may find acceptable identification wording by: 1) using the sample wording provided in the Identification Manual for this purpose; 2) researching the Register for wording that has recently been accepted by the Office and is consistent with the current rules governing identifications; 3) using wording that is the common name widely used in the relevant industry or trade; or 4) drafting wording that otherwise complies with the requirements described in the Code of Federal Regulations as exemplified by the entries in the Identification Manual. 

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Applicant should include the following information on all correspondence with the Office:  (1) the name and law office number of the trademark examining attorney, (2) the serial number and filing date of the application, (3) the date of issuance of this Office action, (4) applicant’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address (if applicable), and (5) the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.194(b)(1); TMEP §302.03(a).

 

E-mail may not be used to file responses to Office actions.  These documents may be filed electronically using TEAS.  TMEP § 304.02.  Further, e-mail may not be used to request an advisory opinion as to the likelihood of overcoming a refusal or requirement. 

 

Applicant may call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney to request additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  However, the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

If applicant does not respond to this Office action within the six-month period for response, the goods and/or services underlined and discussed above will be deleted from the application.  The application will then proceed with the remaining goods and/or services only.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)-(a)(1); TMEP §718.02(a).

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Edward Fennessy/

Attorney Advisor

Law Office 114

571-272-8804

Edward.Fennessy@USPTO.Gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88662910 - ARMATECK - N/A

To: Ferguson Enterprises, LLC (wpoynter@kaleolegal.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88662910 - ARMATECK - N/A
Sent: December 03, 2019 02:53:09 PM
Sent As: ecom114@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on December 03, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88662910

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Edward Fennessy/

Attorney Advisor

Law Office 114

571-272-8804

Edward.Fennessy@USPTO.Gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from December 03, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed