To: | Nimesh Patel (jannet@latan.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88655566 - WE GO TOGETHER LIKE TACOS AND - N/A |
Sent: | February 03, 2020 11:54:37 AM |
Sent As: | ecom125@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88655566
Mark: WE GO TOGETHER LIKE TACOS AND
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Nimesh Patel
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: February 03, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
REFUSAL UNDER TRADEMARK ACT SECTIONS 1, 2, 3, AND 45 – FAILURE TO FUNCTION – COMMON SLOGAN
Applicant’s mark WE GO TOGETHER LIKE TACOS AND TEQUILA is for “Restaurant; Restaurant and bar information services; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and café services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Bar and restaurant services; Fast casual restaurants; Fast-food restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Providing reviews of restaurants; Provision of food and drink in restaurants; Self service restaurants; Take-out restaurant services” in International Class 43.
As explained further below, applicant’s mark is a common sentiment to show appreciation for a menu item or beverage that can be served at a restaurant.
Terms and expressions that merely convey an informational message are not registrable. In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010). Determining whether the term or expression functions as a trademark or service mark depends on how it would be perceived by the relevant public. In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d at 1229; In re Aerospace Optics, Inc., 78 USPQ2d 1861, 1862 (TTAB 2006); TMEP §1202.04. “The more commonly a [term or expression] is used, the less likely that the public will use it to identify only one source and the less likely that it will be recognized by purchasers as a trademark [or service mark].” In re Hulting, 107 USPQ2d 1175, 1177 (TTAB 2013) (quoting In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d at 1229); TMEP §1202.04(b).
The attached evidence from Facebook, Taco Takeover, and Twitter, in total showing six different entities using the wording “WE GO TOGETHER LIKE TACOS AND TEQUILA”, shows that this term or expression is commonly used to refer to encourage the consumption of tacos. Because consumers are accustomed to seeing this term or expression commonly used in everyday speech by many different sources, they would not perceive it as a mark identifying the source of applicant’s services but rather as only conveying an informational message.
An applicant may not overcome this refusal by amending the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register or asserting a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f). TMEP §1202.04(d); see In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d at 1229. Nor will submitting a substitute specimen overcome this refusal. See TMEP §1202.04(d).
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Cuello, Gidette
/Gidette Cuello/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 125
(571)272-1122
gidette.cuello@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE