To: | MIM, LLC (linda@hutchisonpatents.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88648062 - THAT CAR WASH - MOC-10001 |
Sent: | January 16, 2020 02:58:54 PM |
Sent As: | ecom121@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88648062
Mark: THAT CAR WASH
|
|
Correspondence Address: 10015 OLD COLUMBIA ROAD, SUITE B-215
|
|
Applicant: MIM, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. MOC-10001
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: January 16, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
PREMATURE USE REFUSAL
The use or display of a mark in the sale or advertising of goods and/or services before the goods are actually created or provided or the services rendered does not show use in commerce. See Couture v. Playdom, Inc., 778 F.3d 1379, 1380-82, 113 USPQ2d 2042, 2043-44 (Fed. Cir. 2015); In re Cedar Point, Inc., 220 USPQ 533 (TTAB 1983); TMEP §§904, 1301.03(a).
If applicant’s goods were being sold or transported or the services were being rendered in commerce as of the application filing date, applicant must submit the following:
(1) A substitute specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for the goods and/or services specified in the application.
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the application filing date.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05; see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1). If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.
If applicant did not use the applied-for mark in commerce on or before the filing date, applicant may substitute a different basis for filing if applicant can meet the requirements for the new basis. In this case, applicant may wish to amend the application to assert a Section 1(b) basis. See TMEP §806.03(c). However, if applicant amends the basis to Section 1(b), registration will not be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen. See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), (d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103. If the same specimen is submitted with an allegation of use, the same refusal will issue.
To amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date.” 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b); see 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.35(b)(1), 2.193(e)(1).
In this case, applicant must disclaim the wording “CAR WASH” because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable term(s) at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
The attached dictionary evidence shows this wording to mean “an area or structure equipped with facilities for washing automobiles”. Applicant’s services specifically indicate that they offer “business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of car washes” and provides “Car washing” and “Automobile cleaning and car washing”. Accordingly, the wording CAR WASH is descriptive of a feature or characteristic of applicant’s services.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “CAR WASH” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
COLOR CLAIM AND MARK DESCRIPTION REQUIRE AMENDMENT
To clarify how black, white and/or gray are being used in the mark, applicant may satisfy one of the following:
(1) If black, white and/or gray are a feature of the mark, applicant must amend the color claim to include them and amend the description to identify where black, white and/or gray appear in the literal and/or design elements of the mark. The following color claim and description are suggested, if accurate:
Color claim: “The colors blue, white and orange are claimed as a feature of the mark.”
Description: The mark consists of the blue literal element, “THAT”, positioned vertically above an orange literal element, “CAR”, and a blue literal element “WASH”. Above this wording is the design of an orange and white car with an orange dog inside the car. The car is positioned below and to the left of a blue and white water splash design. Below the car and to the right is a water puddle design in blue and white.
(2) If black, white and/or gray are not a feature of the mark, applicant must amend the description to state that black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. The following description is suggested, if accurate:
The mark consists of the blue literal element, “THAT”, positioned vertically above an orange literal element, “CAR”, and a blue literal element “WASH”. Above this wording is the design of an orange car with an orange dog inside the car. The car is positioned below and to the left of a blue water splash design. Below the car and to the right is a water puddle design in blue.
TMEP §807.07(d).
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Krystina Osgood/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(571) 272-8403
Krystina.Osgood@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE