To: | Digga Australia Pty Ltd (TM-CT@cantorcolburn.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88642146 - KANGA LOADERS NORTH AMERICA - SPF0022TUS |
Sent: | December 23, 2019 08:45:11 AM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 Attachment - 18 Attachment - 19 Attachment - 20 Attachment - 21 Attachment - 22 Attachment - 23 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88642146
Mark: KANGA LOADERS NORTH AMERICA
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Digga Australia Pty Ltd
|
|
Reference/Docket No. SPF0022TUS
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 23, 2019
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
The applicant applied to register the mark KANGA LOADERS and design for “Mobile earthworking or earthmoving machines, namely, skid-steer loaders, front end loaders, mini front end loaders, backhoes, trench digging machines, post hole diggers, and rotary broom machines for path sweeping; component parts for the aforesaid goods, namely, engines, hydraulic pumps, hoses and fittings; accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, ground levelling attachments, mechanical arms, loading buckets, augers, earthmoving blades, rotary brooms, trenchers, tree stump grinders, concrete mixers and rock breakers.” The registered mark(s) is KANGA for “mobile earthworking or earthmoving machines, namely, skidsteer loaders, front end loaders, mini front end loaders, backhoes, trench digging machines, post hole diggers, and rotary broom machines for path sweeping; [ component parts for the aforesaid goods, namely, engine, hydraulic pumps, hoses and fittings; ] accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, ground leveling attachments, mechanical arms, loading buckets, augers, earthmoving blades, rotary brooms, trenchers, tree stump grinders, concrete mixers and rock breakers; and b) A kangaroo design mark for “Mobile earthworking or earthmoving machines, namely, skidsteer loaders, front end loaders, mini front end loaders, backhoes, trench digging machines, post hole diggers, [ and rotary broom machines for path sweeping; ] component parts for the aforesaid goods, namely, engines, hydraulic pumps, hoses and fittings; accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, ground leveling attachments, mechanical arms, loading buckets, augers, earthmoving blades, [ rotary brooms, ] trenchers, tree stump grinders, concrete mixers [ and rock breakers ].” The marks of the parties are confusingly similar.
Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that is so similar to a registered mark that it is likely consumers would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the commercial source of the goods and/or services of the parties. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). Likelihood of confusion is determined on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (called the “du Pont factors”). In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Only those factors that are “relevant and of record” need be considered. M2 Software, Inc. v. M2 Commc’ns, Inc., 450 F.3d 1378, 1382, 78 USPQ2d 1944, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing Shen Mfg. Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 1241, 73 USPQ2d 1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); see In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1744 (TTAB 2018).
In a likelihood of confusion determination, tarks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
Goods/Services Compared
OWNERSHIP OF PRIOR REGISTRATION
(1) Record the assignment with the USPTO’s Assignment Recordation Branch (ownership transfer documents such as assignments can be filed online at http://etas.uspto.gov) and promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that the assignment has been duly recorded.
(2) Submit copies of documents evidencing the chain of title.
(3) Submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “Applicant is the owner of U.S. Registration Nos. 2268316; and 2388209.” To provide this statement using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), use the “Response to Office Action” form; answer “yes” to wizard questions #3 and #10; then, continuing on to the next portion of the form, in the “Additional Statement(s)” section, find “Active Prior Registration(s)” and insert the U.S. registration numbers in the data fields; and follow the instructions within the form for signing. The form must be signed twice; a signature is required both in the “Declaration Signature” section and in the “Response Signature” section.
TMEP §812.01; see 15 U.S.C. §1060; 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(1), 3.25, 3.73(a)-(b); TMEP §502.02(a).
Recording a document with the Assignment Recordation Branch does not constitute a response to an Office action. TMEP §503.01(d).
INFORMALITY
DISCLAIMER REQUIREMENT
In this case, applicant must disclaim the wording “LOADERS” and “NORTH AMERICA” wording in the mark because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable term(s) at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a). The term LOADERS is unregistrable on the Principal Register because it is descriptive of the nature, characteristic or features of the underlining goods. This is because applicant’s goods include skid-steer loaders, front end loaders, and mini front end loaders as supported by the provided identification of goods. Also, NORTH AMERICA is geographically descriptive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_America.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “LOADERS” and “NORTH AMERICA” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
/Zachary Bello/
Attorney Advisor
Law Office 111
USPTO
571-272-9376
zack.bello@uspto.gov
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
RESPONSE GUIDANCE