Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE

SERIAL NUMBER:            88633036

DATE:                                01/08/2020

NAME:                               jgriffin

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search       X   Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

 X   OTHER:

 

From: David Schnider <dschnider@nolanheimann.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 11:14 AM
To: Griffin, Jim <Jim.Griffin@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Karen Holme <kholme@nolanheimann.com>
Subject: Re: Minor clarification for FINGER FOOD ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, ser. no. 88633036

 

Thanks Jim. Those changes are perfectly fine. Please go ahead and make them via examiner’s amendment. We appreciate your help. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 8, 2020, at 8:01 AM, Griffin, Jim <Jim.Griffin@uspto.gov> wrote:



Hi David,

 

I got your response for this case, and for the most part everything is acceptable.  The only change I want to make is to the order of the wording in a couple places in Class 9.  For example, the clause “Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications, both downloadable and recorded on computer media” would be clearer if it read “Computer hardware and computer software programs both downloadable and recorded on computer media for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications, both downloadable and recorded on computer media.”  As written, it sounds like the multimedia applications are the ones both downloadable and recorded on computer media.

 

Likewise, “Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces, both downloadable and recorded on computer media” would be clearer if it read “Computer software, namely, software development tools both downloadable and recorded on computer media for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces, both downloadable and recorded on computer media.”

 

Please let me know if those changes are acceptable and if so, I will make them for you via an examiner’s amendment and get this approved.

 

Regards,

Jim Griffin

 

James T. Griffin

Examining Attorney, Law Office 103

United States Patent & Trademark Office

571-272-9169

jim.griffin@uspto.gov