To: | Screen Factories Corporation (theodore.s.lee@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88622325 - HEX - N/A |
Sent: | December 18, 2019 08:59:29 PM |
Sent As: | ecom112@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88622325
Mark: HEX
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Screen Factories Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 18, 2019
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following. Questions regarding the Office Action should be directed to the trademark examining attorney at kyle.peete@uspto.gov.
Search Results
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT SUGGESTED
The applicant or applicant’s counsel is encouraged to send an email to the trademark examining attorney at kyle.peete@uspto.gov authorizing the necessary amendments in order to resolve the issues below via an Examiner’s Amendment.
Summary of Issues
Identification of Goods
The underlined wording in the identification of goods shown below is unacceptable and must be clarified because it is too broad. Suggested amendments with explanation are shown in bold italics. See TMEP §1402.01.
The Office requires a degree of particularity necessary to clearly identify the goods and/or services covered by a mark. See In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 1365, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1543-44 (Fed. Cir. 2007). Descriptions of goods and services in applications must be specific, explicit, clear and concise. TMEP §1402.01; see Cal. Spray-Chem. Corp. v. Osmose Wood Pres. Co. of Am., 102 USPQ 321, 322 (Comm’r Pats. 1954); In re Cardinal Labs., Inc., 149 USPQ 709, 711 (TTAB 1966).
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
International Class 009: {specify type of displays such as flat panel display or LED}
display for smart phones; Light emitting diode (LED) displays; Light Emitting Diode (LED) displays; - {duplicate
entry} OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) display panels; {specify type of displays such as flat panel display or LED} display
panels; Flat panel display screens
Partial Abandonment
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Kyle Christopher Peete/
Kyle Christopher Peete
Trademark Attorney [Law Office 112]
(571) 272-8275 (Phone)
(571) 273-8275 (Fax)
kyle.peete@uspto
RESPONSE GUIDANCE