Offc Action Outgoing

GU DA JIE

Zhong Yu

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88620803 - GU DA JIE - N/A

To: Zhong Yu (yiyi.jin@gmail.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88620803 - GU DA JIE - N/A
Sent: December 29, 2019 08:08:25 PM
Sent As: ecom108@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88620803

 

Mark:  GU DA JIE

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

YIYI JIN

926 BEACH PARK BLVD APT 1

FOSTER CITY, CA 94404

 

 

 

 

Applicant:  Zhong Yu

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 yiyi.jin@gmail.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  December 29, 2019

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

Summary of Issues:

 

  • Requirement – Portrait of Person in Mark;
  • Requirement – Additional Fee;
  • Requirement – Mark Description; and
  • Requirement – Translation and Transliteration.

 

USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found.  The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.  However, applicant must respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.

 

Requirement – Clarification of Portrait of Person in Mark

 

Applicant must clarify whether the portrait of a woman in the mark identifies a particular living individual.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§813, 1206.03.  In this case, the application neither specifies whether the portrait in the mark identifies a particular living individual nor includes a written consent.  See TMEP §§813.01(a)-(b), 1206.04(a), 1206.05.

 

To register a mark that consists of or comprises a portrait or likeness of a particular living individual, an applicant must provide a written consent personally signed by the shown individual.  15 U.S.C. §1052(c); TMEP §§813, 1206.04(a).  

 

Accordingly, if the portrait or likeness in the mark does not identify a particular living individual, applicant must submit a statement to that effect (e.g., “The portrait or likeness shown in the mark does not identify a particular living individual.”). 

 

However, if the portrait or likeness in the mark does identify a particular living individual, applicant must submit both of the following: 

 

(1)        The following statement:  “The portrait(s) or likeness(es) shown in the mark identifies a living individual(s) whose consent(s) to register is made of record.” 

 

(2)        A written consent, personally signed by the pictured individual(s), as follows:  “I, specify ____ [actual name], consent to the use and registration of my likeness as a trademark and/or service mark with the USPTO.”

 

For an overview of the requirements pertaining to portraits or likenesses appearing in marks, and instructions on how to satisfy this requirement online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/consent.jsp.

 

Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. 

 

Requirement – Additional Fee

 

Applicant must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class because the application as filed did not meet the TEAS Plus application filing requirements.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(a), (c); TMEP §§819.01 et seq., 819.04.  Specifically, applicant failed to meet the following application filing requirement(s): a consent to register the mark from the person identified in the mark (or conversely, if appropriate, a statement that the name or portrait in the mark does not identify a living individual) was not provided.

 

The additional fee is required even if applicant later corrects this application requirement.

 

Requirement – Mark Description

 

Applicant must delete from the description any text that does not reference things appearing in the mark, such as interpretation, assessment, or analysis of the mark elements, or indications of how the mark is or is not used or intended to be used.  A description must identify only the literal and design elements shown in the drawing.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §808.02. 

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of a portrait of a Chinese woman wearing an apron with stylized Chinese characters appearing on the apron.  

 

Requirement – Translation and Transliteration

 

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit a more accurate transliteration (a phonetic spelling of the pronunciation, in Latin characters) of the non-Latin characters in the mark and a more accurate English translation of the corresponding non-English transliterated wording. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(10), 2.61(b); TMEP §809. 

 

Applicant may use the following format, if accurate:  The non-Latin characters in the mark transliterate to “GU DA JIE” and this means “a woman with the surname Gu” or “Miss Gu” in English.  TMEP §809.03.

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Miroslav Novakovic/

Miroslav Novakovic, Esq.

Trademark Examining Attorney

United States Patent & Trademark Office

Law Office 108

Office: (571) 272-2866

Email: miroslav.novakovic@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88620803 - GU DA JIE - N/A

To: Zhong Yu (yiyi.jin@gmail.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88620803 - GU DA JIE - N/A
Sent: December 29, 2019 08:08:31 PM
Sent As: ecom108@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on December 29, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88620803

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Miroslav Novakovic/

Miroslav Novakovic, Esq.

Trademark Examining Attorney

United States Patent & Trademark Office

Law Office 108

Office: (571) 272-2866

Email: miroslav.novakovic@uspto.gov

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from December 29, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed