To: | DemandJump Inc. (efstrademarks@taftlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88618411 - GET THE WHOLE STORY - DEM05-00203 |
Sent: | December 20, 2019 05:12:37 PM |
Sent As: | ecom126@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88618411
Mark: GET THE WHOLE STORY
|
|
Correspondence Address: TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP ONE INDIANA SQUARE, SUITE 3500
|
|
Applicant: DemandJump Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. DEM05-00203
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 20, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search of Office’s Database of Marks
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Telephone / Email Response Suggested
Identification of Goods and Services
The identification of goods and services currently reads:
Class 9: computer software and downloadable software that enables executives, sales, and marketing professionals to see, view, gather, track, manipulate, organize, analyze, measure and attribute holistic cross channel data and utilize marketing data and trends
Class 35: business marketing consulting; marketing intelligence services, namely, analyzing and compiling business data for market research purposes; business strategic planning services; business marketing services, namely, strategic marketing services
Class 42: technological consulting in the field of selecting computer technology in the fields of business marketing, planning and market research; providing temporary use of nondownloadable computer software that enables executives, sales, and marketing professionals to view, gather, track, manipulate, organize, analyze and utilize marketing data and trends; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that enables executives, sales, and marketing professionals to view, gather, track, manipulate, organize, analyze and utilize marketing data and trends
The USPTO requires such specificity in order for a trademark examining attorney to examine the application properly and make appropriate decisions concerning possible conflicts between the applicant’s mark and other marks. See In re N.A.D. Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1872, 1874 (TTAB 2000); TMEP §1402.03(d).
Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate (suggested deletion in strikethrough):
Class 9: computer software and downloadable software that enables executives, sales, and marketing professionals to see, view, gather, track,
manipulate, organize, analyze, measure and attribute holistic cross channel data and utilize marketing data and trends
Class 35: business marketing consulting; marketing intelligence services, namely, analyzing and compiling business data for market research purposes; business strategic planning services; business marketing services, namely, strategic marketing services
Class 42: technological consulting in the field of selecting computer technology in the fields of business marketing, planning and market research; providing temporary use of nondownloadable computer software that enables executives, sales, and marketing professionals to view, gather, track, manipulate, organize, analyze and utilize marketing data and trends; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that enables executives, sales, and marketing professionals to view, gather, track, manipulate, organize, analyze and utilize marketing data and trends
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
All applications must include the applicant’s domicile address because domicile dictates whether an applicant is required to have an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state or territory represent the applicant at the USPTO. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.11(a), 2.189; Requirement of U.S.-Licensed Attorney for Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants & Registrants, Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. (Rev. Sept. 2019).
An individual applicant’s domicile is the place a person resides and intends to be the person’s principal home. 37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. A juristic entity’s domicile is the principal place of business, i.e. headquarters, where a juristic entity applicant’s senior executives or officers ordinarily direct and control the entity’s activities. 37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. An applicant whose domicile is located outside of the United States or its territories is foreign-domiciled and must be represented at the USPTO by a U.S.-licensed attorney qualified to practice before the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §11.14. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a).
The application record lists applicant’s address as being “c/o” or in “care of” another party’s address. In most cases, a “care of” address is not acceptable as a domicile address because it does not identify the physical location of applicant’s headquarters. See37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.189; Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3. Thus, applicant must provide its domicile street address. See 37 C.F.R. §2.189. Alternatively, an applicant may demonstrate that the listed address is, in fact, the applicant’s domicile. Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3.
To provide applicant’s domicile address. After opening the correct TEAS response form and entering the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #5, and provide applicant’s street address on the “Owner Information” page.
If applicant amends the application to list a domicile street address located outside of the United States or its territories, applicant is foreign-domiciled and must appoint a U.S. licensed attorney qualified to practice before the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §11.14 as its representative before the application may proceed to registration. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information. If applicant’s domicile street address is located within the United States or its territories, applicant is not required to appoint a U.S.-licensed attorney.
Advisory – Responding to a Non-Final Office Action
Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/Sara Anne Helmers/
Sara Helmers (she/her)
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 126
571-270-3639
Sara.Helmers@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE