To: | PLANTRESPONSE BIOTECH, S.L. (trademarks@smithlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88618197 - PLANT RESPONSE - 14867.1 |
Sent: | December 17, 2019 07:52:57 AM |
Sent As: | ecom109@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88618197
Mark: PLANT RESPONSE
|
|
Correspondence Address: SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHE
|
|
Applicant: PLANTRESPONSE BIOTECH, S.L.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 14867.1
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 17, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Summary of issues:
A. No Conflicting Marks Found
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
B. Identification of Goods/Services
Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods/services if accurate: See TMEP §1402.01
International Class 001: {chemical} reparations for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; substances for enhancing the growth of agricultural, horticultural and forestry products {please define the substances}; substances for fortifying agricultural, horticultural and forestry products{please define the substances}; soil enhancement preparations for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; compositions for use in coatings on agricultural seeds to improve nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency, growth, disease resistance and yield {define the compositions in this class}; {Chemical} preparations for preventing or reducing pathogenic infections in plants
Consulting services are classified according to the subject matter of the consulting service; for example, “business management consultancy” is classified in International Class 35 and “computer technology consultancy” is classified in International Class 42. TMEP §1402.11(e).
Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods/services if accurate: See TMEP §1402.01
International Class 042: Scientific and technological services {please define e.g. scientific research, analysis, testing, etc.} in the field of {indicate field or subject matter} and {scientific} research and design relating to the physiology and biotechnology of plants, cultures and agriculturally-relevant microbes; transfer of technical know-how; technological services {please define the specific services}; {scientific research namely} plant physiology, biotechnology and microbial research; research and development {please define the research and what is in development}; consultancy relating to plant physiology, biotechnology and microbes {please define the specific consulting services}; {scientific} research in the field of microbes, plant physiology and biotechnology
Although identifications of goods and/or services may be amended to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, adding to or broadening the scope of the goods and/or services is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07. Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods and/or services that are not within the scope of the goods and/or services set forth in the present identification.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
C. Disclaimer Required
Applicant must provide a disclaimer of the unregistrable part(s) of the applied-for mark even though the mark as a whole appears to be registrable. See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a). A disclaimer of an unregistrable part of a mark will not affect the mark’s appearance. See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965).
In this case, applicant must disclaim “PLANT” because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable term(s) at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
The attached evidence from the Internet shows this wording means a living thing that grows in soil, has leaves and roots, and needs water and light from the sun to live and would commonly be used in connection with similar goods and services because applicant is offering goods and services related to plant physiology and the wording would be considered a feature.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “PLANT” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Rossman, William/
William M. Rossman
Examing Attorney
Law Office 109
571-272-9029
William.Rossman@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE