To: | Jim S. Hall & Associates, L.L.C. (jcrose@jimshall.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88616029 - JH - N/A |
Sent: | December 16, 2019 03:49:32 PM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88616029
Mark: JH
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Jim S. Hall & Associates, L.L.C.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 16, 2019
The USPTO database of registered and pending marks have been searched and no conflicting registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d) (2012). Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure § 704.02 (October 2018).
Applicant must submit a new drawing of the mark. Applicant has submitted a special form color drawing of the mark described in the initial filing as consisting of the “Capital script initials JH connected to each other in black lettering over a 5 sided shield outlined in red on a white background.” The initial filing also indicates that the colors red, black and white are claimed as a feature of the mark.
The drawing is not acceptable because it will not create a high quality image when reproduced. See TMEP § 807.04(a). Specifically, the drawing image is too small, resulting in a blurry overall image. A clear drawing of the mark is an application requirement. 37 C.F.R. § 2.52.
Therefore, Applicant must submit a new drawing showing a clear depiction of the mark. All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, and not fine or crowded. 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.53(c), 2.54(e); TMEP §§ 807.05(c), 807.06(a). Additionally, the USPTO will not accept a new drawing in which there are amendments or changes that would materially alter the applied-for mark. 37 C.F.R. § 2.72; see TMEP §§ 807.13-.14.
For more information about drawings and instructions on how to submit a drawing, see the Drawing webpage.
TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE
Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§ 819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§ 819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§ 819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues raised in this Office Action. 15 U.S.C. § 1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§ 711, 718.03. Otherwise, this application will be abandoned. 37 C.F.R. § 2.65(a).
How to respond: Click to file a response to this non-final Office action. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§ 304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
Please contact the undersigned attorney with any additional questions.
Sincerely,
/Judy Helfman/
Judith M. Helfman
Attorney, Law Office 111
571/272-5892
judy.helfman@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE