To: | Froning Farms, LLC (geg@grayiplaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88611833 - FRONING FARMS EST. 2016 - FF 2 |
Sent: | December 11, 2019 10:11:29 AM |
Sent As: | ecom109@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88611833
Mark: FRONING FARMS EST. 2016
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Froning Farms, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. FF 2
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 11, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
In this case, applicant must disclaim the wording “FARMS” and “EST. 2016” because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable term(s) at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
FARMS means “a tract of land devoted to agricultural purposes” or “an area containing a number of similar structures or objects (such as radio antennas or storage tanks)”. See attached, or http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/farms.
EST. means “Established”. See attached, or http://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=EST. ESTABLISHED means “To cause (an institution, for example) to come into existence or begin operating; found; set up”. See attached, or http://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=established.
As illustrated by the dictionary definition, the wording “FARMS” and EST. 2016” describes a feature, characteristic, function, purpose, subject matter, or intended audience of applicant’s goods, namely, an entity established (EST.) in 2016 providing clothing and meat sticks produced from FARMS.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “FARMS” and “EST. 2016” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
An applicant may not claim exclusive rights to terms that others may need to use to describe their goods and/or services in the marketplace. See Dena Corp. v. Belvedere Int’l, Inc., 950 F.2d 1555, 1560, 21 USPQ2d 1047, 1051 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Aug. Storck KG, 218 USPQ 823, 825 (TTAB 1983). A disclaimer of unregistrable matter does not affect the appearance of the mark; that is, a disclaimer does not physically remove the disclaimed matter from the mark. See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 978, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965); TMEP §1213.
MARK DESCRIPTION CLARIFICATION
- Please note that there are two white rectangles to the left of the mark.
The following description is suggested, if accurate:
The mark consists of the wording “FRONING FARMS” in stylized font, with a side profile of a bison superimposed over the first letter “N” and the wording “EST. 2016” is separated by the wording “FARMS”, all within a partial border rectangle, and two rectangles appear to the left, one outside the border and one inside the border.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Philip Liu/
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Law Office 109
(571) 272 - 6792
Philip.Liu@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE