Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88607296 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 116 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | mark |
LITERAL ELEMENT | ZIRCOSTAR |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
OWNER SECTION (current) | |
NAME | NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO., LTD. |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | Osaka-shi |
MAILING ADDRESS | No.1-1, 4-chome, Koraibashi, Chuo-ku, |
CITY | Osaka |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 541-0043 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | Japan |
OWNER SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO., LTD. |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | Osaka-shi |
MAILING ADDRESS | No.1-1, 4-chome, Koraibashi, Chuo-ku, |
CITY | Osaka |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 541-0043 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | Japan |
XXXX | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
This responds to the Office Action that issued on December 10, 2019. As a preliminary matter the Examining Attorney should note that the original attorney who filed the application is no longer a member of the firm of record. Applicant appointed the undersigned, with whom the Examining Attorney spoke on or around December 10, 2019, to continue prosecution of this application. A Revocation and Appointment of Attorney was filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on February 4, 2020. Further communications should, therefore, be directed to the attention of the undersigned. The Examining Attorney raised the following issues in the Office Action:
Applicant, by its undersigned counsel, responds to each issue in turn below. I. Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion The Examining Attorney refused registration of Applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), based upon the existence of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,123,691 for the mark ZIRCOSTAR for “Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, ceramic materials for dental use for fillings, crowns, and bridges” in Class 5. The Examining Attorney and Applicant’s undersigned counsel spoke about this refusal on or around December 10, 2019 when the Examining Attorney contacted Applicant’s former attorney about a possible Examiner’s Amendment. At that time the Examining Attorney indicated that if Applicant were to include the language “none of the foregoing being for dental use” at the end of the description of goods, a likelihood of confusion refusal could be avoided. Thus, in response to the likelihood of confusion refusal Applicant has amended the description of goods to include the language “none of the foregoing being for dental use.” Applicant submits that the exclusionary language is sufficient to avoid confusion. II. Requirement for an Acceptable Identification of Goods The Examining Attorney objected to the wording “unprocessed plastics for lenses” in Class 1 as being too vague. The Examining Attorney suggested amending this wording to read as “unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of lenses.” Applicant has accepted the Examining Attorney’s proposal. Thus, with the exclusionary language discussed in Section I, the description of goods in Class 1 should be amended to read as follows: Class 1 Industrial chemicals; chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; unprocessed plastic resins for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; metal oxide powders for industrial purposes; dispersants for industrial purposes comprised of metal oxide powders; industrial chemicals in liquid form comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of lenses; unprocessed plastics; unexposed photographic films; none of the foregoing being for dental use III. Requirement for Basis Clarification The Examining Attorney noted in the Office Action that the application asserts a dual basis relying upon a Japanese registration and intent-to-use basis. The Examining Attorney states that the application can proceed based upon the Japanese registration. Thus, Applicant has deleted the intent-to-use basis. *** With the above, Applicant submits that all outstanding issues have now been resolved and respectfully requests that the application be approved for publication. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 001 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Industrial chemicals; chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; unprocessed plastic resins for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; metal oxide powders for industrial purposes; dispersants for industrial purposes comprised of metal oxide powders; industrial chemicals in liquid form comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics for lenses; unprocessed plastics; unexposed photographic films | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
FILING BASIS | Section 44(e) |
FOREIGN REGISTRATION NUMBER | 5444821 |
FOREIGN REGISTRATION COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
Japan |
FOREIGN REGISTRATION DATE |
10/14/2011 |
FOREIGN EXPIRATION DATE | 10/14/2021 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 001 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
Industrial chemicals; chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of optical
materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid
crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; unprocessed plastic resins for use
in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical
filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; metal oxide powders for industrial purposes; dispersants for industrial purposes comprised of metal oxide powders; industrial chemicals
in liquid form comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics comprised of metal oxide powders; |
|
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Industrial chemicals; chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; unprocessed plastic resins for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; metal oxide powders for industrial purposes; dispersants for industrial purposes comprised of metal oxide powders; industrial chemicals in liquid form comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of lenses; unprocessed plastics; unexposed photographic films; none of the foregoing being for dental use | |
DELETED FILING BASIS | 1(b) |
FILING BASIS | Section 44(e) |
FOREIGN REGISTRATION NUMBER | 5444821 |
FOREIGN REGISTRATION COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
Japan |
FOREIGN REGISTRATION DATE |
10/14/2011 |
FOREIGN EXPIRATION DATE | 10/14/2021 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | Sean P. McMahon |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | tm@ostrolenk.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | smcmahon@ostrolenk.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | TE/2710-161 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Sean P. McMahon |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | tm@ostrolenk.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | smcmahon@ostrolenk.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | TE/2710-161 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | I elect not to submit a signed declaration because I believe one is not required by the Trademark Rules of Practice. I understand that I still may be required to submit a signed declaration. |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /SPM/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Sean P. McMahon |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney for Applicant |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 212-382-0700 |
DATE SIGNED | 02/21/2020 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Fri Feb 21 17:45:03 ET 2020 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XX.XXX-20 200221174503664459-886072 96-71064b2881d5755bdac1c6 b0e579a02978a1c3b9cd6b617 64a83a6eab73286a65-N/A-N/ A-20200221174159017001 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
This responds to the Office Action that issued on December 10, 2019.
As a preliminary matter the Examining Attorney should note that the original attorney who filed the application is no longer a member of the firm of record. Applicant appointed the undersigned, with whom the Examining Attorney spoke on or around December 10, 2019, to continue prosecution of this application. A Revocation and Appointment of Attorney was filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on February 4, 2020. Further communications should, therefore, be directed to the attention of the undersigned.
The Examining Attorney raised the following issues in the Office Action:
Section 2(d) Refusal—Likelihood of Confusion;
Requirement for an Acceptable Identification of Goods; and
Requirement for Basis Clarification.
Applicant, by its undersigned counsel, responds to each issue in turn below.
I. Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion
The Examining Attorney refused registration of Applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), based upon the existence of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,123,691 for the mark ZIRCOSTAR for “Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, ceramic materials for dental use for fillings, crowns, and bridges” in Class 5. The Examining Attorney and Applicant’s undersigned counsel spoke about this refusal on or around December 10, 2019 when the Examining Attorney contacted Applicant’s former attorney about a possible Examiner’s Amendment. At that time the Examining Attorney indicated that if Applicant were to include the language “none of the foregoing being for dental use” at the end of the description of goods, a likelihood of confusion refusal could be avoided. Thus, in response to the likelihood of confusion refusal Applicant has amended the description of goods to include the language “none of the foregoing being for dental use.” Applicant submits that the exclusionary language is sufficient to avoid confusion.
II. Requirement for an Acceptable Identification of Goods
The Examining Attorney objected to the wording “unprocessed plastics for lenses” in Class 1 as being too vague. The Examining Attorney suggested amending this wording to read as “unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of lenses.” Applicant has accepted the Examining Attorney’s proposal. Thus, with the exclusionary language discussed in Section I, the description of goods in Class 1 should be amended to read as follows:
Class 1
Industrial chemicals; chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; unprocessed plastic resins for use in the manufacture of optical materials, namely, optical lenses, light guide plates, light diffusion plates, polarizing plates, optical compensation films, protective films for optics, optical filters, optical films for liquid crystal, optical films for organic electro-luminescence, optical adhesives, optical waveguide fabrication materials, and resist agents; metal oxide powders for industrial purposes; dispersants for industrial purposes comprised of metal oxide powders; industrial chemicals in liquid form comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics comprised of metal oxide powders; unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of lenses; unprocessed plastics; unexposed photographic films; none of the foregoing being for dental use
III. Requirement for Basis Clarification
The Examining Attorney noted in the Office Action that the application asserts a dual basis relying upon a Japanese registration and intent-to-use basis. The Examining Attorney states that the application can proceed based upon the Japanese registration. Thus, Applicant has deleted the intent-to-use basis.
***
With the above, Applicant submits that all outstanding issues have now been resolved and respectfully requests that the application be approved for publication.