To: | Jewel Kilcher (ksm@wassermanlawgroup.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88598030 - JEWEL - N/A |
Sent: | December 03, 2019 03:37:35 PM |
Sent As: | ecom101@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88598030
Mark: JEWEL
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Jewel Kilcher
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 03, 2019
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
REFUSALS & REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 2(c) REFUSAL
The refusal under Section 2(c) will be withdrawn if applicant provides both of the following:
(1) A statement that the name JEWEL shown in the mark identifies JEWEL KILCHER, a living individual whose consent is of record. (If the name represents that of a pseudonym, stage name, title and name combination, or nickname, applicant must include a statement that JEWEL identifies the pseudonym/stage name/title and name/nickname of JEWEL KILCHER, a living individual whose consent is of record.)
(2) A written consent, personally signed by the individual whose name, signature, or portrait appears in the mark, authorizing applicant to register the identifying matter as a trademark and/or service mark with the USPTO; for example, an applicant may use, if applicable, the following: “I, JEWEL KILCHER, consent to the use and registration of my name as a trademark and/or service mark with the USPTO.”
See TMEP §§813, 813.01(a), 1206.04(a).
Applicant is advised that the written consent must include a statement of the party’s consent to applicant’s registration, and not just the use, of the identifying matter as a trademark. See Krause v. Krause Publ’ns, Inc., 76 USPQ2d 1904, 1912-13 (TTAB 2005); In re New John Nissen Mannequins, 227 USPQ 569, 571 (TTAB 1985); TMEP §1206.04(a).
IDENTIFICATION
Specifically, the following entries require revision:
Class 41
“entertainment services in the nature of musical performances provided by an on-line global computer network” is overbroad. For example, this includes downloadable musical recordings in Class 9. If accurate, “entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances provided by an on-line global computer network” would be acceptable in Class 41.
“providing information on a musical artist and such artist's music, sound and video recordings, pictures, news, special projects, tours, personal appearances, biography and other information about such artist via an on-line global computer network” is overbroad. Information is classified according to subject.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:
Class 9
Musical sound recordings; pre-recorded records, audio cassettes, compact discs and cd-roms featuring music and lyrics; pre-recorded video tapes featuring musical entertainment; laser discs featuring musical entertainment; video discs featuring musical entertainment; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring musical entertainment
Class 41
Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances provided
by an on-line global computer network; providing entertainment information about a musical artist including
topics such as the artist's music, sound and video recordings, pictures, news, special musical entertainment projects, concert tours, personal appearances, and biography and other information about such artist via an on-line global computer
network
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Samuel R. Paquin/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 101
United States Patent & Trademark Office
(571) 272-2514
spaquin@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE