To: | Public Financial Management, Inc. (ejs@stevenslee.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88597642 - AGILE MODELING INTELLIGENCE - 104877-00028 |
Sent: | September 20, 2019 11:51:12 AM |
Sent As: | ecom127@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88597642
Mark: AGILE MODELING INTELLIGENCE
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Public Financial Management, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 104877-00028
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 20, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH RESULTS: The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Duplicate Application Refusal
Mark Description and Color Claim Requirement
Although applicant submitted a drawing showing the mark in color with a color claim, applicant did not provide the required description that specifies where each color appears in the literal and design elements in the mark. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii). Therefore, applicant must provide this description. See TMEP §807.07(a)(ii).
The following description is suggested, if accurate: “The mark consists of a green circle with a green dumbbell shape below the circle. To the right of the design is the wording “AGILE MODELING INTELLIGENCE” in black.
The following color claim is suggested, if accurate: “The colors green and black are claimed as a feature of the mark.” TMEP §807.07(a)(i).
Disclaimer Requirement
In this case, applicant must disclaim all the wording in the mark because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable terms at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
The attached evidence from The Free Dictionary demonstrates that “AGILE” is commonly used in connection with software to describe “a set of principles for software development under which requirements and solutions evolve through the collaborative effort of self-organizing cross-functional teams.” Additionally, the attached evidence from Agile Alliance, Cprime, and Search Software Quality demonstrates that “AGILE” is frequently used in connection with software. Furthermore, the attached evidence from Investopedia demonstrates that the wording “MODELING” is frequently used in connection with the wording “financial” to describe “the process of creating a summary of a company’s expenses and earnings in the form of a spreadsheet that can be used to calculate the impact of a future event or decision.” Also, the attached evidence from Lexico demonstrates that “INTELLIGENCE” is defined as “Information in general.” Therefore, in the context of applicant’s services, “AGILE MODELING INTELLIGENCE” immediately conveys to consumers that applicant’s services are performed in accordance with a set of principles, and that the computer software gathers information to produce financial models that are used for financial planning. Thus, the wording “AGILE MODELING INTELLIGENCE” describes a feature or characteristic of applicant’s services.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “AGILE MODELING INTELLIGENCE” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
Applicant has identified the following services:
International Class 36: “Financial analysis, namely, compiling, analyzing, and projecting statistics, data and other sources of information for financial planning purposes”
International Class 42: “Non-downloadable computer software for producing financial models”
International Class 42
If accurate, applicant may adopt the suggestion below, which reflects all of the necessary changes discussed above and shows added or amended language underlined for clarity:
International Class 36: [no changes]
International Class 42: Providing online non-downloadable computer software for producing financial models
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Brittany Colton/
Brittany Colton
Examining Attorney
Law Office 127
571-272-2572
brittany.colton@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE