To: | University of Louisville (jwheat@mcbrayerfirm.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88592868 - UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE - 15305-44 |
Sent: | December 05, 2019 01:10:33 PM |
Sent As: | ecom109@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88592868
Mark: UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE
|
|
Correspondence Address: 500 WEST JEFFERSON STREET, SUITE 2400
|
|
Applicant: University of Louisville
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 15305-44
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 05, 2019
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
However, the applicant must address the following issues:
LEGAL ENTITY DESIGNATION
If applicant is a corporation, applicant must specify the U.S. state or foreign country under which it is incorporated. TMEP §803.03(c).
If applicant is an association, applicant must specify the U.S. state or foreign country under whose laws the applicant is organized or exists, and indicate whether the association is incorporated or unincorporated. Id.
If applicant is a partnership, applicant must specify the U.S. state or foreign country under whose laws the partnership is organized. TMEP §803.03(b). In addition, for a U.S. partnership, applicant must list, if not yet specified, the names, legal entities, and national citizenship (for individuals), or the U.S. state or foreign country of organization or incorporation (for businesses) of all general partners. Id. For foreign partnerships, the names and citizenships of the general partners are not required. See id.
If applicant is a joint venture, applicant must specify the U.S. state or foreign country under whose laws the joint venture is organized. Id. In addition, for a U.S. joint venture, applicant must list the names, legal entities, and national citizenship (for individuals) or the U.S. state or foreign country of organization or incorporation (for businesses) of all active members of the joint venture. Id. For foreign joint ventures, the names and citizenships of the active members are not required. See id.
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration will be refused because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES
Education services in the nature of early childhood instruction; Educational programs, namely, pre-schools; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical and dramatic performances; Entertainment services in the nature of production of musical and dramatic performances and artistic, historical, and cultural displays and exhibitions, namely, [specify type and subject matter, e.g., art exhibition services, providing education in the field of history rendered through live theater performances]; Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Organisation of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Applicant must disclaim the wording “UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE” because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable terms are at best primarily geographically descriptive of the origin of applicant’s services. See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(e)(2); In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 824 F.2d 957, 959, 3 USPQ2d 1450, 1451-52 (Fed. Cir. 1987); TMEP §§1210.01(a), 1210.06(a), 1213.03(a).
The attached evidence from www.merriam-webster.com shows that “LOUISVILLE” is a generally known geographic place or location, namely, the largest city in Kentucky. See TMEP §§1210.02 et seq. The services for which applicant seeks registration originate in this geographic place or location as shown by the applicant’s address and the specimen of use. See TMEP §1210.03. Because the services originate in this place or location, a public association of the services with the place is presumed. See In re Hollywood Lawyers Online, 110 USPQ2d 1852, 1858 (TTAB 2014) (citing In re Spirits of New Merced, LLC, 85 USPQ2d 1614, 1621 (TTAB 2007)); TMEP §§1210.02(a) 1210.04. The term “UNIVERSITY” is generic because it refers immediately to the class name and genus of the services, as shown by the identification of services and the specimen of use.
Please note that the applicant has already conceded that these terms are geographically descriptive and generic, respectively, as shown by the Applicant’s claim of ownership of U.S. Registration Nos. 2011567 and 265136.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Susan Stiglitz/
Trademark Examining Attorney
USPTO, Law Office 109
susan.stiglitz@uspto.gov
571-272-9285
RESPONSE GUIDANCE