To: | Rebel Creamery LLC (docket@hollandhart.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88584476 - REBEL - 108583.0003 |
Sent: | June 29, 2020 09:14:59 AM |
Sent As: | ecom115@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88584476
Mark: REBEL
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Rebel Creamery LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 108583.0003
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: June 29, 2020
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
Action on this application is SUSPENDED pending the disposition of the previously referenced potentially-conflicting pending application(s). 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c); TMEP §§716.02(c), 1208.02(c).
Applicant was previously provided information regarding pending U.S. Application Serial No(s). 88214087, 87546121, 87546103, 87176151, 87162265, and 86626999, which may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark based on a likelihood of confusion under Trademark Act Section 2(d). See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. In response, applicant argued that the mark in the pending application is not likely to cause confusion with applicant’s mark. Application No. 87546121 has not yet registered or abandoned, and applicant’s narrowing of its goods does not appear to resolve the potential likelihood of confusion. Further, the state of the Register must be complete for the proper determination to be made. Again, applicant’s arguments will be addressed in detail once the state of the Register with respect to the relevant applications and registrations is resolved, if appropriate.
Accordingly, the trademark examining attorney has found applicant’s arguments unpersuasive and still believes there may be a likelihood of confusion between applicant’s mark and the mark(s) in the cited prior-pending application(s), should they register. Thus, this application remains suspended.
Applicant may file a petition to the Director to review this decision. See TMEP §716.03. However, the Director will reverse an examining attorney’s action only where there has been clear error or abuse of discretion. Id. There is a fee for filing a petition. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(16).
The pending application(s) below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application(s) below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application(s) below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application(s) below was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial No(s). 87546121
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Jim Hill/
James Hill
Examining Attorney
Law Office 115, USPTO
(571) 270-5682
james.hill@uspto.gov