To: | Millburn Ridgefield Corporation (trademark@cll.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88569804 - MILLBURN - 31745.001 |
Sent: | November 08, 2019 01:13:06 PM |
Sent As: | ecom118@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88569804
Mark: MILLBURN
|
|
Correspondence Address: COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.
|
|
Applicant: Millburn Ridgefield Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 31745.001
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: November 08, 2019
Database Search: The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Summary of Issues Applicant Must Address
Refusal Based on Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4) – Surname Significance of the Mark
Registration is refused because the applied-for mark is primarily merely a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); see TMEP §1211.
An applicant’s mark is primarily merely a surname if the surname, when viewed in connection with the applicant’s recited goods and/or services, “‘is the primary significance of the mark as a whole to the purchasing public.’” Earnhardt v. Kerry Earnhardt, Inc., 864 F.3d 1374, 1377, 123 USPQ2d 1411, 1413 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (quoting In re Hutchinson Tech. Inc., 852 F.2d 552, 554, 7 USPQ2d 1490, 1492 (Fed. Cir. 1988)); TMEP §1211.01.
The following five inquiries are often used to determine the public’s perception of a term’s primary significance:
(1) Whether the surname is rare;
(2) Whether anyone connected with applicant uses the term as a surname;
(3) Whether the term has any recognized meaning other than as a surname;
(4) Whether the term has the structure and pronunciation of a surname; and
(5) Whether the term is sufficiently stylized to remove its primary significance from that of a surname.
In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 & n.2, 1282-83 (TTAB 2016) (citing In re Benthin Mgmt. GmbH, 37 USPQ2d 1332, 1333-34 (TTAB 1995) for the Benthin inquiries/factors); TMEP §1211.01; see also In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F.2d 15, 16-18, 225 USPQ 652, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1985).
These inquiries are not exclusive, and any of these circumstances – singly or in combination – and any other relevant circumstances may be considered when making this determination. In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d at 1277-78; TMEP §1211.01. For example, when the applied-for mark is not stylized, it is unnecessary to consider the fifth inquiry. In re Yeley, 85 USPQ2d 1150, 1151 (TTAB 2007); TMEP §1211.01.
The evidence attached at the end of this Office action from the LEXISNEXIS® surname database establishes the surname significance of MILLBURN. This evidence, consisting of a sample of 50 entries, shows that the applied-for mark appears 305 times as a surname in the database, which is a weekly updated directory of cell phone and other phone numbers (such as voice over IP) from various data providers.
For this reason, the examining attorney finds that because the mark is primarily merely a surname, registration of the applicant's mark is barred under Section 2(e)(4) of the Trademark Act.
Additional Information about the Mark
The applicant should note that a term that is the surname of an individual applicant or that of an officer, founder, owner, or principal of applicant’s business is probative evidence of the term’s surname significance. TMEP §1211.02(b)(iv); see, e.g., In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F.2d 15, 16, 225 USPQ 652, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (holding DARTY primarily merely a surname where “Darty” was the surname of applicant’s corporate president); In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1276, 1278-80 (TTAB 2016) (holding ALDECOA primarily merely a surname where ALDECOA was the surname of the founder and individuals continuously involved in the business); In re Integrated Embedded, 120 USPQ2d 1504, 1507 (TTAB 2016) (holding BARR GROUP primarily merely a surname where BARR was the surname of the co-founder and applicant’s corporate officer and GROUP was found “incapable of lending source-identifying significance to the mark”); Miller v. Miller, 105 USPQ2d 1615, 1620, 1622-23 (TTAB 2013) (holding MILLER LAW GROUP primarily merely a surname where “Miller” was the surname of the applicant and the term “law group” was found generic).
Applicant’s Response to Surname Refusal
In response to the surname refusal, the applicant may (1) claim acquired distinctiveness of the mark or (2) amend the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register.
Claim of Acquired Distinctiveness
A mark deemed primarily merely a surname may be registered on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(f) by satisfying one of the following:
1) Submit a claim of ownership of one or more active prior registrations on the Principal Register for a mark that is the same as the mark in the application and for the same or related goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(1); TMEP §§1212, 1212.04. The following wording is suggested: “The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services as evidenced by the ownership of active U. S. Registration No. [indicate] on the Principal Register for the same mark for sufficiently similar goods and/or services.” TMEP § 1212.04(e). The applicant should note that the mark MILLBURN RIDGEFIELD CORPORATION, which was registered in Registration No. 5819925, is not the same mark as the current mark RIDGEFIELD. See In re Binion, 93 USPQ2d 1531, 1539 (TTAB 2009) (finding BINION and BINION’S are not the legal equivalents of the registered marks JACK BINION and JACK BINION’S).
2) Submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. 37 §2,20: “The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services through the applicant’s substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least five years immediately before the date of this statement.” 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(1); TMEP §§1212.05(d), see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1).; or
3) Submit actual evidence of acquired distinctiveness. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(3); TMEP §§1212.06. Such evidence may include the following: examples of advertising and promotional materials that specifically promote the applied-for mark as a trademark and/or service mark in the United States; dollar figures for advertising devoted to such promotion; dealer and consumer statements of recognition of the applied-for mark as a trademark and/or service mark; and any other evidence that establishes recognition of the applied-for mark as a source-identifier for the goods and/or services. See In re Ideal Indus., Inc., 508 F.2d 1336, 184 USPQ 487 (C.C.P.A. 1975); In re Instant Transations Corp. of Am., 201 USPQ 957 (TTAB 1979); TMEP §§1212.06 et. seq.
Trademark Act Section 2(f), 15 U.S.C. §1052(f); see 37 C.F.R. §2.41; TMEP §§1211, 1212.
Amendment to Supplemental Register
(1) Use of the registration symbol ® with the registered mark in connection with the designated goods and/or services, which provides public notice of the registration and potentially deters third parties from using confusingly similar marks.
(2) Inclusion of the registered mark in the USPTO’s database of registered and pending marks, which will (a) make it easier for third parties to find it in trademark search reports, (b) provide public notice of the registration, and thus (c) potentially deter third parties from using confusingly similar marks.
(3) Use of the registration by a USPTO trademark examining attorney as a bar to registering confusingly similar marks in applications filed by third parties.
(4) Use of the registration as a basis to bring suit for trademark infringement in federal court, which, although more costly than state court, means judges with more trademark experience, often faster adjudications, and the opportunity to seek an injunction, actual damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs.
(5) Use of the registration as a filing basis for a trademark application for registration in certain foreign countries, in accordance with international treaties.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(d), 1091, 1094; J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition §§19:33, 19:37 (rev. 4th ed. Supp. 2017).
Information for TEAS Applicants
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Leigh Caroline Case/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 118
leigh.case@uspto.gov (preferred)
RESPONSE GUIDANCE
Search: Public Records : Surname
Terms: last-name(Millburn) maxresults(500)
Total number found: 305
No. Name Address Phone
1. MILLBURN, A 4011 HOPI CT
ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-5446 410-461-6441
2. MILLBURN, A 187 MILLBURN
MILLBURN, NJ 07041-1847 973-379-5047
3. MILLBURN, A MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-376-0670
4. MILLBURN, A MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-376-9298
5. MILLBURN, A R MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-379-0691
6. MILLBURN, A R MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-379-1463
7. MILLBURN, A R MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-379-1485
8. MILLBURN, A R MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-379-8928
9. MILLBURN, ADAM 2806 BRITTANY
SAINT CHARLES, IL 60175-5161 630-659-7696
10. MILLBURN, ADAM ELBURN, IL 60119 630-659-6090
11. MILLBURN, ALLISON ILEANE 9640 S RIVEROAKS
BATON ROUGE, LA 70815-4445 225-448-3518
12. MILLBURN, ANDREW 1670 CHAPEL HILLS DR
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80920-5446 719-268-0953
13. MILLBURN, ANGELA 1308 DEERFIELD
MONROEVILLE, PA 15146-4408 412-373-3544
14. MILLBURN, ANGELA 708-522-1319
15. MILLBURN, ASHLIN TOPEKA, KS 66612 785-220-9748
16. MILLBURN, BARBARA 4610 MATTHEWS PARK DR
SNELLVILLE, GA 30039-7100 770-978-4820
17. MILLBURN, BETTY L 3605 SW HOLLY LN
TOPEKA, KS 66604-2552 785-272-9032
18. MILLBURN, BLAINE ELBURN, IL 60119 630-659-7282
19. MILLBURN, BLAINE WOOD DALE, IL 60191 630-659-7282
20. MILLBURN, BLAIR 1001 ASHBERRY
LA GRANGE, KY 40031-6502 502-265-0134
21. MILLBURN, BLAIR BUCKNER, KY 40010 502-758-9944
22. MILLBURN, BLAIR LA GRANGE, KY 40031 502-758-9944
23. MILLBURN, BOARD MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-258-0659
24. MILLBURN, BRANDIE J 369 CHICKASAW
SAND SPRINGS, OK 74063-6848 918-241-4316
25. MILLBURN, BRANDO BONSALL, CA 92003 760-716-5534
26. MILLBURN, BRANDO DENVER, CO 80201 303-359-0309
27. MILLBURN, BRANDO VISTA, CA 92081 760-716-5534
28. MILLBURN, BRANDON 546 CROSSING
CASTLE PINES, CO 80108-3423 720-280-4704
29. MILLBURN, BRET 264 LONDON
CENTERVILLE, UT 84014-1927 801-380-8408
30. MILLBURN, BRIAN 8129 BRIGANTINE
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80920-4405 719-554-4338
31. MILLBURN, BRIAN 8129 BRIGANTINE
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80920-4405 719-554-4338
32. MILLBURN, BRITTANY 180178 LARUE
COMANCHE, OK 73529 580-251-0381
33. MILLBURN, BRYAN TANNER 1055 N 725 W
BRIGHAM CITY, UT 84302-6780 435-230-5573
34. MILLBURN, C 10533 CROPPER
PLEASUREVILLE, KY 40057-7079 703-853-8730
35. MILLBURN, C 18577 W MILLBURN
OLD MILL CREEK, IL 60083-9645 224-542-9590
36. MILLBURN, C BELTSVILLE, MD 20705 703-380-6420
37. MILLBURN, C BURKE, VA 22015 703-380-6420
38. MILLBURN, C CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 619-382-9058
39. MILLBURN, C ENCINITAS, CA 92024 760-943-1627
40. MILLBURN, C FREDERICKSBURG, VA 22405 540-842-1766
41. MILLBURN, C MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-467-5783
42. MILLBURN, C MILLBURN, NJ 07041 973-467-9639
43. MILLBURN, C RAPID CITY, SD 57702 605-209-1635
44. MILLBURN, CAMILLE P 346 W 150 N
MORGAN, UT 84050-9932 801-829-4263
45. MILLBURN, CASSI A 1204 MILLBRIDGE
WEST BOUNTIFUL, UT 84087-1418 801-833-7334
46. MILLBURN, CATHERINE 9710 MILLBURN DR
SAINT LOUIS, MO 63136-1946 314-388-1219
47. MILLBURN, CATHRYN J 412 E THORNBERRY
DRAPER, UT 84020-6826 801-391-3778
48. MILLBURN, CHAD 369 CHICKASAW
SAND SPRINGS, OK 74063-6848 918-519-2722
49. MILLBURN, CHAD 369 CHICKASAW
SAND SPRINGS, OK 74063-6848 918-633-3979
50. MILLBURN, CHAD 369 CHICKASAW
SAND SPRINGS, OK 74063-6848 918-636-1991
Search: Public Records: Surname
Terms: last-name(Millburn) maxresults(500)
Date/Time: Thursday, November 07, 2019 10:34 AM