Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)

OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

---

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)

OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action

To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88555850 LOK 100(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88555850/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES

Applicant proposes to amend the following:
Current: Class 041Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, mastermind groups, and workshops in the fields of entrepreneurship, digital media, digital marketing, joint venture partnerships, sales skills, sales techniques, negotiation techniques, and advertising copywriting, and distribution of course and educational materials in connection therewith; Providing on-line training in the form of courses, seminars, workshops and training sessions in the fields of entrepreneurship, digital media, digital marketing, joint venture partnerships, sales skills, sales techniques, negotiation techniques, and advertising copywriting
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services in the application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization. For a certification mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, and the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant.

Filing Basis: Section 44(d), Priority based on foreign filing: For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a certification application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods or services that meet the certification standards of the applicant, and the applicant asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. Claim of priority is based on[ Canada application number 1953164 filed 03/22/2019]. 15 U.S.C.Section 1126(d), as amended.

Proposed:
Tracked Text Description: Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, mastermind groups, and workshops in the fields of entrepreneurship, digital media, digital marketing, joint venture partnerships, sales skills, sales techniques, negotiation techniques, and advertising copywriting, and distribution of course and educational materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, group coaching, and workshops in the fields of entrepreneurship, digital media, digital marketing, joint venture partnerships, sales skills, sales techniques, negotiation techniques, and advertising copywriting, and distribution of course and educational materials in connection therewith; Providing on-line training in the form of courses, seminars, workshops and training sessions in the fields of entrepreneurship, digital media, digital marketing, joint venture partnerships, sales skills, sales techniques, negotiation techniques, and advertising copywriting; Providing on-line training in the form of courses, seminars, workshops and training sessions in the fields of entrepreneurship, digital media, digital marketing, joint venture partnerships, sales skills, sales techniques, negotiation techniques, and advertising copywriting
Filing Basis: Section 44(d), Priority based on foreign filing:For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a certification mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods or services that meet the certification standards of the applicant, and the applicant asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. Claim of priority is based on [ Canada application number 1953164 filed 03/22/2019]. 15 U.S.C.Section 1126(d), as amended.
INTENT TO PERFECT 44(d) : At this time, the applicant intends to rely on Section 44(e) as a basis for registration and requests that the application be suspended to await the submission of the foreign registration. If ultimately the applicant does not rely on §44(e) as a basis for registration, a valid claim of priority may be retained.

The owner's/holder's proposed attorney information Abraham Lichy. Abraham Lichy of The Lichy Law Firm, P.C., is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, is located at

      222 East 68th Street
      New York, New York 10065
      United States
to submit this Response to Office Action Form on behalf of the applicant.
The docket/reference number is 108.

The phone number is 9179333895.

The email address is alichy@lichylaw.com

Abraham Lichy submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory.Correspondence Information (current):
      Dan Lok Education, Inc.
      PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: tm@trademarkfactory.com
      SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): uspto.tms@gmail.com; susan@highticketsales.com
Correspondence Information (proposed):
      Abraham Lichy
      PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: alichy@lichylaw.com
      SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): uspto.tms@gmail.com

The docket/reference number is 108.

Requirement for Email and Electronic Filing: I understand that a valid email address must be maintained by the owner/holder and the owner's/holder's attorney, if appointed, and that all official trademark correspondence must be submitted via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).

SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature

DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.

STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.

STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.

Signature: /Abraham Lichy/      Date: 02/21/2020
Signatory's Name: Abraham Lichy
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record, New York Bar Member
Signatory's Phone Number: 9179333895


Response Signature
Signature: /Abraham Lichy/     Date: 02/21/2020
Signatory's Name: Abraham Lichy
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record, New York Bar Member

Signatory's Phone Number: 9179333895

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

Mailing Address:    Dan Lok Education, Inc.
   
   
   9229 Hardy Road
   Delta, BC, V4C4V4
Mailing Address:    Abraham Lichy
   The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.
   222 East 68th Street
   New York, New York 10065
        
Serial Number: 88555850
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Feb 21 10:00:47 ET 2020
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XX.XXX-20200221100047369
411-88555850-710a0d87343bfab9213ada5ce90
6f4eb12e1acd20f8e4a5559d3c26b3218ea-N/A-
N/A-20200221095635642649