Response to Office Action

EVICAM

ELDANDACHI, ZAKARIA KHALED

Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 88548579
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 113
MARK SECTION
MARK http://uspto.report/TM/88548579/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT EVICAM
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
ARGUMENT(S)
The Examining Attorney disclosed a conflict to a prior registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. The cited conflict was for ?EVICAM? in association with, in pertinent part, ?vehicle incident surveillance systems? in International Class 009. Applicant?s mark is ?EVICAM? in association with, as amended, ?downloadable mobile application for capturing and transmitting encrypted and geotagged photo and video files between users for purposes of preserving and communicating evidence? in International Class 009. Applicant submits that this cited registration would not give rise to a likelihood of confusion with Applicant?s mark. The case of In re E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Company, 177 U.S.C.Q. 563 (CCPA 1973) (?Dupont?) sets forth the factors to be considered in determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists. There is no bright line test and each case must be decided on its own facts. TMEP ?1207.01. The first factor is the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. Applicant admits that the conflicting marks are identical. The second Dupont factor is the relatedness of the marks? associated goods and services. Registrant?s trademark encompasses physical surveillance devices and, as the Examining Attorney points out, such goods are closely related to applications whereby users can control such surveillance equipment. However, Applicant?s services utilize the user?s phone or application host hardware for capture purposes, and, more importantly, emphasize the encrypted transmission and sharing of captured media between users. The main focus of the app is to form a communication network for sharing of important data. Therefore, the analysis between the parties? marks really hinges on the similarities and differences in the applications. As stated before, Applicant?s application emphasizes sharing of data, whereas applications that typically accompany or supplement Registrant?s hardware are for purposes only of capture and control. There is no networking element. Additionally, it is the practice of the USPTO to register pairs of marks in extremely close proximity or posture, similar to marks in the present case. For example: Mark 1 Mark 2 International Class ?RIP CURL? ?RIP TIDE? 035; 009 ?SURF & SPORT? ?SURF & CYCLE? 009; 009 In the cases cited, both co-registered marks encompass virtually identical goods or services that the Examining Attorney has deemed to be related. The USPTO has repeatedly determined, then, that pairs of marks that differ by one unrelated word or syllable but have identical goods and services are simultaneously registrable. It follows, then, that Registrant?s mark and Applicant?s mark should be allowed simultaneous registration. In summary, based on the differences in services, consumer bases and trade channels, Applicant asserts that no likelihood of confusion exists with the ?EVICAM? mark.
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009
DESCRIPTION
Downloadable mobile applications for iOS devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Android Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Windows Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Ubuntu Devices
FILING BASIS Section 1(a)
        FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE At least as early as 03/01/2019
        FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE At least as early as 07/01/2019
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION
Downloadable mobile applications for iOS devices; Downloadable mobile application for capturing and transmitting encrypted and geotagged photo and video files between users for purposes of preserving and communicating sensitive and important data.; Downloadable mobile applications for Android Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Windows Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Ubuntu Devices
FINAL DESCRIPTION
Downloadable mobile application for capturing and transmitting encrypted and geotagged photo and video files between users for purposes of preserving and communicating sensitive and important data.
FILING BASIS Section 1(a)
       FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE At least as early as 03/01/2019
       FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE At least as early as 07/01/2019
ATTORNEY SECTION (new)
NAME Daniel Ross
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER XXX
YEAR OF ADMISSION XXXX
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY XX
FIRM NAME Daniel Ross & Associates LLC
INTERNAL ADDRESS Upper Unit
STREET 1515 Ridgewood Ave
CITY Lakewood
STATE Ohio
POSTAL CODE 44107
COUNTRY United States
PHONE 2163075590
EMAIL dr@danielrosslawfirm.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY Daniel Ross
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current)
NAME ELDANDACHI, ZAKARIA KHALED
STREET 5TH FLOOR - AWQAF BUILDING - CENTRAL TAL
CITY TRIPOLI
POSTAL CODE 00961
COUNTRY LB
PHONE +961-3190590
EMAIL info@zakdandachi.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed)
NAME Daniel Ross
FIRM NAME Daniel Ross & Associates LLC
INTERNAL ADDRESS Upper Unit
STREET 1515 Ridgewood Ave
CITY Lakewood
STATE Ohio
POSTAL CODE 44107
COUNTRY United States
PHONE 2163075590
EMAIL dr@danielrosslawfirm.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Daniel Ross/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Daniel Ross
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record, Ohio bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 2163075590
DATE SIGNED 11/04/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Mon Nov 04 17:13:21 EST 2019
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XX.XX-2
0191104171321165943-88548
579-70031906bc1ed44f14ea6
099aad097ed13dcf474cebe95
510eac577c5b46deb7-N/A-N/
A-20191104171038409367



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88548579 EVICAM(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88548579/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

The Examining Attorney disclosed a conflict to a prior registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. The cited conflict was for ?EVICAM? in association with, in pertinent part, ?vehicle incident surveillance systems? in International Class 009. Applicant?s mark is ?EVICAM? in association with, as amended, ?downloadable mobile application for capturing and transmitting encrypted and geotagged photo and video files between users for purposes of preserving and communicating evidence? in International Class 009. Applicant submits that this cited registration would not give rise to a likelihood of confusion with Applicant?s mark. The case of In re E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Company, 177 U.S.C.Q. 563 (CCPA 1973) (?Dupont?) sets forth the factors to be considered in determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists. There is no bright line test and each case must be decided on its own facts. TMEP ?1207.01. The first factor is the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. Applicant admits that the conflicting marks are identical. The second Dupont factor is the relatedness of the marks? associated goods and services. Registrant?s trademark encompasses physical surveillance devices and, as the Examining Attorney points out, such goods are closely related to applications whereby users can control such surveillance equipment. However, Applicant?s services utilize the user?s phone or application host hardware for capture purposes, and, more importantly, emphasize the encrypted transmission and sharing of captured media between users. The main focus of the app is to form a communication network for sharing of important data. Therefore, the analysis between the parties? marks really hinges on the similarities and differences in the applications. As stated before, Applicant?s application emphasizes sharing of data, whereas applications that typically accompany or supplement Registrant?s hardware are for purposes only of capture and control. There is no networking element. Additionally, it is the practice of the USPTO to register pairs of marks in extremely close proximity or posture, similar to marks in the present case. For example: Mark 1 Mark 2 International Class ?RIP CURL? ?RIP TIDE? 035; 009 ?SURF & SPORT? ?SURF & CYCLE? 009; 009 In the cases cited, both co-registered marks encompass virtually identical goods or services that the Examining Attorney has deemed to be related. The USPTO has repeatedly determined, then, that pairs of marks that differ by one unrelated word or syllable but have identical goods and services are simultaneously registrable. It follows, then, that Registrant?s mark and Applicant?s mark should be allowed simultaneous registration. In summary, based on the differences in services, consumer bases and trade channels, Applicant asserts that no likelihood of confusion exists with the ?EVICAM? mark.

CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES

Applicant proposes to amend the following class of goods/services in the application:
Current: Class 009 for Downloadable mobile applications for iOS devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Android Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Windows Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Ubuntu Devices
Original Filing Basis:
Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended. The mark was first used at least as early as 03/01/2019 and first used in commerce at least as early as 07/01/2019 , and is now in use in such commerce.

Proposed:
Tracked Text Description: Downloadable mobile applications for iOS devices; Downloadable mobile application for capturing and transmitting encrypted and geotagged photo and video files between users for purposes of preserving and communicating sensitive and important data.; Downloadable mobile applications for Android Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Windows Devices; Downloadable mobile applications for Ubuntu DevicesClass 009 for Downloadable mobile application for capturing and transmitting encrypted and geotagged photo and video files between users for purposes of preserving and communicating sensitive and important data.
Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended. The mark was first used at least as early as 03/01/2019 and first used in commerce at least as early as 07/01/2019 , and is now in use in such commerce.
The applicant hereby appoints Daniel Ross. Other appointed attorneys are Daniel Ross. Daniel Ross of Daniel Ross & Associates LLC, is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, and the attorney(s) is located at

      Upper Unit
      1515 Ridgewood Ave
      Lakewood, Ohio 44107
      United States
to submit this Response to Office Action Form on behalf of the applicant.

The phone number is 2163075590.

The email address is dr@danielrosslawfirm.com

Daniel Ross submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory.
The applicant's current correspondence information: ELDANDACHI, ZAKARIA KHALED. ELDANDACHI, ZAKARIA KHALED, is located at

      5TH FLOOR - AWQAF BUILDING - CENTRAL TAL
      TRIPOLI, 00961
      LB

The phone number is +961-3190590.

The email address is info@zakdandachi.com

The applicants proposed correspondence information: Daniel Ross. Daniel Ross of Daniel Ross & Associates LLC, is located at

      Upper Unit
      1515 Ridgewood Ave
      Lakewood, Ohio 44107
      United States

The phone number is 2163075590.

The email address is dr@danielrosslawfirm.com

SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /Daniel Ross/     Date: 11/04/2019
Signatory's Name: Daniel Ross
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, Ohio bar member

Signatory's Phone Number: 2163075590

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

Mailing Address:    ELDANDACHI, ZAKARIA KHALED
   
   
   5TH FLOOR - AWQAF BUILDING - CENTRAL TAL
   TRIPOLI, 00961
Mailing Address:    Daniel Ross
   Daniel Ross & Associates LLC
   Upper Unit
   1515 Ridgewood Ave
   Lakewood, Ohio 44107
        
Serial Number: 88548579
Internet Transmission Date: Mon Nov 04 17:13:21 EST 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XX.XX-2019110417132116
5943-88548579-70031906bc1ed44f14ea6099aa
d097ed13dcf474cebe95510eac577c5b46deb7-N
/A-N/A-20191104171038409367



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed