Offc Action Outgoing

WANDO

SODEXO

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88520897 - WANDO - N/A


United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88520897

 

Mark:  WANDO

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Timothy H. Hiebert

SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLC

TWO INTERNATIONAL PLACE, SUITE 2330

BOSTON, MA 02110-4104

 

 

 

Applicant:  SODEXO

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 hiebert@samuelsTM.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  October 08, 2019

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

Applicant's Voluntary Amendment dated September 16, 2019 has been entered into the record.

 

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES PRESENTED IN THIS OFFICE ACTION:

·       Section 2(d) Refusal—Likelihood of Confusion

·       Prior-filed Application—Advisory

·       Identification Amendment Required

·       Multi-Class Application Requirements

·       Mark Description Amendment Required

·       Section 44(d) Sole Basis With Intent To Perfect To Section 44(e)—Foreign Registration Required   

 

 

SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL—LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION

 

Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the marks in U.S. Registration Nos. 5237345, 4675344, and 5299067. Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.  See the attached registrations.

 

Applicant’s mark is “WANDO” and design, for use with:

 

Class 9: Downloadable computer software applications; applications for mobile telephones; computer software and mobile software applications for online booking of restaurants and catering services; computer software and mobile software applications for online booking of workspaces and meeting rooms; computer software and mobile software applications for online requesting repair of office apparatus and installation of office apparatus; computer software and mobile software applications for requesting emergency action for security issues; computer software and mobile software applications for requesting emergency action for sanitary issues; computer software and mobile software applications for commercial intermediation services; computer software and mobile software applications for providing secure payment for commercial transactions; computer software and mobile software applications for issuing promotional vouchers

 

Class 35: Commercial intermediation services; sales promotion for others; presentation of goods on all communication media for retail sale; commercial information by means of mobile applications; commercial information via websites; organization and management of customer loyalty business operations; issuing of promotional vouchers

 

Class 36: Providing secure payment of commercial transactions; issuing of vouchers; online secure payment services; providing financial information through websites and mobile applications

 

Class 37: Repair of air conditioning apparatus; repair of air cooling apparatus; repair of elevators; repair of escalators; vehicle breakdown assistance (repair); repair of boilers; repair of heating apparatus; repair and interference suppression of electrical apparatus; repair of food and beverage distribution apparatus; repair of ovens; repair of kitchen equipment; repair of refrigerating apparatus; repair of locks; repair of fire alarm devices; repair and maintenance of fire-extinguishing apparatus; repair of burglar alarms; repair of security systems; repair of machines; furniture restoration; repair of gas and water installations; repair of power generation apparatus and installations; repair of computer networks and telecommunication networks; repair of telecommunication apparatus; repair of computers; repair of computer hardware; repair of office apparatus; repair of telephones; repair of telephone cables; repair of facsimile machines; installation of air-conditioning apparatus; installation of elevators; installation of escalators; boiler installation; installation of heating apparatus; electrical installations for buildings; installation of food and beverage distribution apparatus; installation of kitchen equipment; installation of fire alarm devices; installation of fire extinguishers apparatus; installation of burglar alarms; installation of security systems; installation of supplying gas and water apparatus and equipment; installation of energy production apparatus and devices; installation of computer and telecommunication networks; installation of telecommunication apparatus; installation of computers; installation of computer hardware; installation of office apparatus; installation of telephones; installation of telephone cables; installation of facsimile machines; installation of office furniture; maintenance and cleaning of buildings; window cleaning; cleaning of buildings (exterior surface); disinfection; rat exterminating; vehicle maintenance (servicing); vehicle cleaning; vehicle washing; cleaning of clothing; laundering

 

Class 39: Delivery of goods; delivery of flowers

 

Class 43: Online booking of catering services; online information relating to menus offered in restaurants and company restaurants; services for providing food and drink; hotel services; rental of meeting rooms; temporary providing of offices, meeting rooms, exhibition rooms, seminar rooms and conference rooms

 

Class 45: Concierge services

 

The registered marks are as follows:

 

U.S. Registration No. 4675344 “WAND”, for use with:

 

Class 42: Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of contingent workforce personnel

 

U.S. Registration No. 5237345 “WAND”, for use with:

 

Class 9: stereos for personal and commercial use; wireless stereos for personal and commercial use; mp3 players and digital audio players; audio amplifiers; stereo receivers; audio speakers; amplifier for wireless communications; wireless computer peripherals; wireless hand-held devices for use in controlling a music system; remote controls for digital music systems; remote controls for stereos; handheld devices for playing, organizing, downloading, transmitting, manipulating and reviewing audio, and media files; handheld devices for controlling speakers, amplifiers, stereo systems and entertainment systems; computer hardware and software for use in playing, organizing, downloading, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing audio files and media files, and for developing and managing audio relay and separation systems; computer hardware and software for use in controlling speakers, amplifiers, stereo systems, home theater systems, and home entertainment systems; computer software for use in controlling digital music systems; computer hardware; computer peripherals; home theater systems comprised of digital music players, digital music controllers, speakers, amplifiers, and wireless handheld controllers; home entertainment systems comprised of digital music players, digital music controllers, speakers, amplifiers, and wireless handheld controllers

 

U.S. Registration No. 5299067 “WANDS”, for use with:

 

Class 9: Computer game software; computer game entertainment software; downloadable electronic games programs; video game software; games software for use on mobile phones, tablets and other electronic mobile devices; games software downloadable to mobile phones, tablets and other electronic mobile devices; computer software applications featuring computer games; virtual reality game software; augmented reality game software; computer programs for video and computer games; electronic game software; electronic game software for wireless devices

 

Class 41: Electronic game services provided by means of the Internet; electronic game services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer and video games; providing non-downloadable electronic games for mobile phones, tablets and other electronic mobile devices; providing interactive single and multi-player electronic games via the internet; publishing of computer game software, electronic games and video game software; video game entertainment services, namely, providing online computer and video games; operation of online game sites, namely, providing a website featuring online computer and video games; electronic game services, namely, provision of computer games online, on online social networks, and by means of a global computer network

 

Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that is so similar to a registered mark that it is likely consumers would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the commercial source of the goods and services of the parties.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  Likelihood of confusion is determined on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (called the “du Pont factors”).  In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir. 2017).  Only those factors that are “relevant and of record” need be considered.  M2 Software, Inc. v. M2 Commc’ns, Inc., 450 F.3d 1378, 1382, 78 USPQ2d 1944, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing Shen Mfg. Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 1241, 73 USPQ2d 1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); see In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1744 (TTAB 2018). 

 

Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any likelihood of confusion analysis:  (1) the similarities between the compared marks and (2) the relatedness of the compared goods and services.  See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at 1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002)); Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.,544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated by [Section] 2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and differences in the marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.

 

In this case, the following factors are the most relevant:  similarity of the marks, similarity and nature of the goods and services, and similarity of the trade channels of the goods and services.  See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1361-62, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1593, 1595-96 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.

 

Comparison of Marks

 

Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.  Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v).  “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.”  In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).

 

Applicant's mark is “WANDO” and design, and the registrants’ marks are “WAND” and “WANDS”. When evaluating a composite mark consisting of words and a design, the word portion is normally accorded greater weight because it is likely to make a greater impression upon purchasers, be remembered by them, and be used by them to refer to or request the goods and services.  In re Aquitaine Wine USA, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1181, 1184 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012)); TMEP §1207.01(c)(ii).  Thus, although marks must be compared in their entireties, the word portion is often considered the dominant feature and is accorded greater weight in determining whether marks are confusingly similar, even where the word portion has been disclaimed.  In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d at 1366-67, 101 USPQ2d at 1911 (citing Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation’s Foodservice, Inc., 710 F.2d 1565, 1570-71, 218 USPQ2d 390, 395 (Fed. Cir. 1983)). Thus, the dominant portion of the applicant's mark is the word “WANDO” because consumers will be more likely to refer to this word portion of the mark.

 

Here, the wording “WANDO” in applicant's mark is highly similar to the wording “WAND” and “WANDS” comprising the registrants’ marks. Similarity in sound alone may be sufficient to support a finding that the marks are confusingly similar.  In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB 1988); see In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB 2007); TMEP §1207.01(b)(iv). Further, note that slight differences in the sound of similar marks will not avoid a likelihood of confusion.  In re Energy Telecomm. & Elec. Ass’n, 222 USPQ 350, 351 (TTAB 1983); see In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1367, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1912 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

 

In this case, because the word portion of the applicant's mark is highly similar in sound to the registrants' marks the marks are confusingly similar.

 

Comparison of Goods and Services

 

The goods and services are compared to determine whether they are similar, commercially related, or travel in the same trade channels.  See Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369-71, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722-23 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1165, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2002); TMEP §§1207.01, 1207.01(a)(vi).

 

As Compared to Goods under Registration No. 5299067 “WANDS”

 

Determining likelihood of confusion is based on the description of the goods and services stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence of actual use.  See In re Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1307, 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1052 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (citing In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1325, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1749 (Fed. Cir. 2017)).  

 

In this case, the application uses broad wording to describe “downloadable computer software applications; applications for mobile telephones,” which presumably encompasses all goods of the type described, including registrant’s more narrow “downloadable electronic games programs; games software for use on mobile phones, tablets and other electronic mobile devices; games software downloadable to mobile phones, tablets and other electronic mobile devices; computer software applications featuring computer games.”  See, e.g., In re Solid State Design Inc., 125 USPQ2d 1409, 1412-15 (TTAB 2018); Sw. Mgmt., Inc. v. Ocinomled, Ltd., 115 USPQ2d 1007, 1025 (TTAB 2015).  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods are legally identical.  See, e.g., In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 127 USPQ2d 1627, 1629 (TTAB 2018) (citing Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. v.Gen. Mills Fun Grp., Inc., 648 F.2d 1335, 1336, 209 USPQ 986, 988 (C.C.P.A. 1981); Inter IKEA Sys. B.V. v. Akea, LLC, 110 USPQ2d 1734, 1745 (TTAB 2014); Baseball Am. Inc. v. Powerplay Sports Ltd., 71 USPQ2d 1844, 1847 n.9 (TTAB 2004)).

 

Additionally, the goods of the parties have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers and are “presumed to travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of purchasers.”  In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1268, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods are related.

 

Further, the compared goods and services need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.  See On-line Careline Inc. v. Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894, 1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).  They need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing are such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods and/or services] emanate from the same source.”  Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715, 1724 (TTAB 2007)); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).

 

Applicant's goods include downloadable computer software applications and applications for mobile telephones, and the registrant's services also include providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer and video games. Applicant's and the registrant's goods and services are related because the goods and services of the respective parties are of a type that are commonly provided by a single source under the same mark. See attached evidence from King, MSN Games, and Big Fish Games showing goods and services such as downloadable computer software applications, applications for mobile telephones, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer and video games provided by a single source under the same mark. Therefore, consumers familiar with the registrant's services will also expect applicant's goods to be provided by the registrant.

 

As Compared to Goods under Registration No. 5237345 “WAND”

 

As previously discussed, determining likelihood of confusion is based on the description of the goods and stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence of actual use. 

 

In this case, the application uses broad wording to describe “downloadable computer software applications; applications for mobile telephones,” which presumably encompasses all goods of the type described, including registrant’s more narrow “computer… software for use in playing, organizing, downloading, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing audio files and media files, and for developing and managing audio relay and separation systems; computer… software for use in controlling speakers, amplifiers, stereo systems, home theater systems, and home entertainment systems; computer software for use in controlling digital music systems; computer hardware.”  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods are legally identical. 

 

Additionally, the goods of the parties have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers and are presumed to travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of purchasers.  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods are related.

 

Further, the compared goods and services need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.  They need only be related in some manner such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that the goods and services emanate from the same source.

 

Applicant's services include repair of computer networks and telecommunication networks, repair of telecommunication apparatus, repair of computers, and repair of computer hardware, and the registrant's goods include mp3 players and digital audio players, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and audio speakers. Applicant's and the registrant's goods and services are related because the goods and services of the respective parties are of a type that are commonly provided by a single source under the same mark. See attached evidence from HP, Apple, and Dell showing goods such as mp3 players and digital audio players, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and audio speakers and services such as repair of computer networks and telecommunication networks, repair of telecommunication apparatus, repair of computers, and repair of computer hardware provided by a single source under the same mark. Therefore, consumers familiar with the registrant's goods will also expect applicant's services to be provided by the registrant.

 

As Compared to Goods under Registration No. 4675344 “WAND”

 

The compared goods and services need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.  They need only be related in some manner such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that the goods and services emanate from the same source.

 

Applicant's goods include computer software and mobile software applications for online booking of workspaces and meeting rooms, and the registrant's services are software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of contingent workforce personnel. Applicant's and the registrant's goods and services are related because the goods and services of the respective parties are of a type that are commonly provided by a single source under the same mark. See attached evidence from Asure Software, Habu, Aqilquest, and CoWork.io showing computer software and mobile software applications for online booking of workspaces and meeting rooms and software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of contingent workforce personnel provided by a single source under the same mark. Therefore, consumers familiar with the registrant's services will also expect applicant's goods to be provided by the registrant.

 

Conclusion

 

The relatedness of the goods and services here, coupled with the similar marks at issue, requires registration of the applied-for mark to be refused under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act.

 

Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.  However, if applicant responds to the refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the requirements which follow the advisory below.

 

 

PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION—ADVISORY

 

The filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 88134893 precedes applicant’s filing date.  See attached referenced application.  If the mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion between the two marks.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, upon receipt of applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced application.

 

In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application.  Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.

 

 

IDENTIFICATION AMENDMENT REQUIRED

 

Select entries in applicant's identification are indefinite because the wording is overly vague and the nature, use, or purpose of applicant's goods and services is unclear. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Other entries are indefinite because the wording describes goods and services in multiple International Classes. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.

 

Additionally, the identification of goods and services contains parentheses.  Generally, applicants should not use parentheses and brackets in identifications in their applications so as to avoid confusion with the USPTO’s practice of using parentheses and brackets in registrations to indicate goods and services that have been deleted from registrations or in an affidavit of incontestability to indicate goods and services not claimed.  See TMEP §1402.12.  The only exception is that parenthetical information is permitted in identifications in an application if it serves to explain or translate the matter immediately preceding the parenthetical phrase in such a way that it does not affect the clarity or scope of the identification, e.g., “fried tofu pieces (abura-age).”  Id.

 

Therefore, applicant must remove the parentheses from the identification and incorporate any parenthetical or bracketed information into the description of the goods and services.

 

If accurate, applicant may adopt the following wording and classes:

 

Class 9: Downloadable computer software applications for {specify items, e.g., mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers}, namely, software for {specify the function of the programs, e.g., use in database management, use in electronic storage of data}; applications for mobile telephones, namely, downloadable mobile applications for {indicate use, e.g., use in database management, use in electronic storage of data}; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones, both of the foregoing for online booking of restaurants and catering services; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones, both of the foregoing for online booking of workspaces and meeting rooms; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones for online requesting of repair of office apparatus and installation of office apparatus; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones for requesting emergency action for security issues; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones for requesting emergency action for sanitary issues; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones for {indicate specific function in relation to commercial intermediation services, e.g., booking, requesting quotes for} commercial intermediation services; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones for providing secure payment for commercial transactions; downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications for mobile phones for issuing promotional vouchers

 

Class 35: Commercial intermediation services, namely, business intermediary services relating to the matching of potential private investors with entrepreneurs needing funding; sales promotion for others; presentation of goods on all communication media for retail sale, namely, {indicate specific services, e.g., providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise}; providing commercial information in the field of {indicate subject matter}, accessible by means of mobile applications; providing commercial information in the field of {indicate subject matter} via websites; organization and management of customer loyalty business operations, namely, business administration of consumer loyalty programs; issuing of promotional vouchers, namely, promoting the goods of others by providing vouchers for the goods of others

 

Class 36: Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; issuing of vouchers of cash value for the payment of goods and services of others; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure payment options online; providing financial information through websites and mobile applications

 

Class 37: Repair of air conditioning apparatus; repair of air cooling apparatus; repair of elevators; repair of escalators; vehicle breakdown assistance, namely, vehicle repair; repair of boilers; repair of heating apparatus; repair and interference suppression services for electrical apparatus; repair of food and beverage distribution apparatus; repair of ovens; repair of kitchen equipment; repair of refrigerating apparatus; repair of locks; repair of fire alarm devices; repair and maintenance of fire-extinguishing apparatus; repair of burglar alarms; repair of security systems; repair of {indicate type of machines being repaired, e.g., electronic, office, telecommunication, cleaning} machines; furniture restoration; repair of gas and water installations; repair of power generation apparatus and installations; repair of computer networks and telecommunication networks; repair of telecommunication apparatus; repair of computers; repair of computer hardware; repair of office apparatus, namely, repair of {indicate specific office apparatuses repaired, e.g., telephones, fax machines, copiers}; repair of telephones; repair of telephone cables; repair of facsimile machines; installation of air-conditioning apparatus; installation of elevators; installation of escalators; boiler installation; installation of heating apparatus; installation of electrical {indicate specific electrical elements being installed} for buildings; installation of food and beverage distribution apparatus; installation of kitchen equipment; installation of fire alarm devices; installation of fire extinguishers apparatus; installation of burglar alarms; installation of security systems; installation of supplying gas and water apparatus and equipment; installation of energy production apparatus and devices; installation of computer and telecommunication networks; installation of telecommunication apparatus; installation of computers; installation of computer hardware; installation of office apparatus namely, installation of {indicate specific office apparatuses repaired, e.g., telephones, fax machines, copiers}; installation of telephones; installation of telephone cables; installation of facsimile machines; installation of office furniture; maintenance and cleaning of buildings; window cleaning; cleaning of building exteriors; disinfecting; rat exterminating other than for agriculture, aquaculture, forestry and horticulture; vehicle maintenance; vehicle cleaning; vehicle washing; cleaning of clothing; laundering

 

Class 39: Delivery of goods; delivery of flowers

 

Class 42: Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for online booking of restaurants and catering services;  Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for online booking of workspaces and meeting rooms; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for use in online requesting of repair of office apparatus and installation of office apparatus; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for requesting emergency action for security issues; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for requesting emergency action for sanitary issues; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for {indicate specific function in relation to commercial intermediation services, e.g., booking, requesting quotes for} commercial intermediation services; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for providing secure payment for commercial transactions; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for issuing promotional vouchers

 

Class 43: Online booking of catering services; restaurant information services, namely, providing online information relating to menus offered in restaurants and company restaurants; services for providing food and drink; hotel services; rental of meeting rooms; providing of and reservation of temporary accommodations, namely,  temporary provision of offices, meeting rooms, exhibition rooms, seminar rooms and conference rooms

 

Class 44: Rat exterminating for agriculture, aquaculture, horticulture and forestry; Concierge medicine services

 

Class 45: Personal concierge services for others comprising making requested {indicate type of appointments, e.g., doctor's, dentist's, hair, etc.} appointments to meet individual needs; hotel concierge services

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).  Additionally, for U.S. applications filed under Trademark Act Section 44(e), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments may not exceed the scope of the goods and/or services identified in the foreign registration.  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); Marmark, Ltd. v. Nutrexpa, S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989) (citing In re Löwenbräu München, 175 USPQ 178, 181 (TTAB 1972)); TMEP §§1012, 1402.01(b).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Applicant must additionally respond to the requirement below.

 

 

MULTI-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

 

The application identifies goods and services in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 44:

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least 9 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 7 class(es).  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 44 multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

Applicant must additionally respond to the requirement below.

 

 

MARK DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT REQUIRED

 

Applicant must submit an amended description of the mark because the current one is incomplete and does not describe all the significant aspects of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Descriptions must be accurate and identify all the literal and design elements in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808 et seq. 

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of the stylized word “WANDO” in blue font, and the design of a stylized red wand comprised of a seven-pointed star in red, with two overlapping curved lines in red below it, one in the form of a helical loop and the other doubled back so that its two halves are roughly parallel to each other. The color white is not claimed and is presented as background only.

 

Applicant must additionally respond to the requirement below.

 

 

SECTION 44(d) SOLE BASIS WITH INTENT TO PERFECT TO SECTION 44(e)—FOREIGN REGISTRATION REQUIRED

 

The application specifies Trademark Act Section 44(d) as the sole filing basis and indicates that applicant intends to rely on Section 44(e) as a basis for registration; however no copy of a foreign registration was provided.  See 15 U.S.C. §1126(d), (e). 

 

An application with a Section 44(e) basis must include a true copy, photocopy, certification, or certified copy of a foreign registration from an applicant’s country of origin.  15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01, 1016.  In addition, the applicant’s country of origin must be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law.  15 U.S.C. §1126(b); TMEP §§1002.01, 1004.

 

Therefore, applicant must provide a copy of the foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin when it becomes available.  TMEP §1003.04(a).  A copy of a foreign registration must consist of a document issued to an applicant by, or certified by, the intellectual property office in applicant’s country of origin.  TMEP §1004.01.  If applicant’s country of origin does not issue registrations or Madrid Protocol certificates of extension of protection, the applicant may submit a copy of the Madrid Protocol international registration that shows that protection of the international registration has been extended to applicant’s country of origin.  TMEP §1016.  In addition, applicant must also provide an English translation if the foreign registration is not written in English.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b).  The translation should be signed by the translator.  TMEP §1004.01(b).

 

If the foreign registration is not yet available, applicant should inform the trademark examining attorney that the foreign application is still pending and request that the U.S. application be suspended until a copy of the foreign registration is available.  TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04(a).

 

If applicant cannot satisfy the requirements of the Section 44(e) basis, applicant may amend the basis to Section 1(a) or 1(b), if applicant can satisfy the requirements for the new basis.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126(e); TMEP §806.03.  Please note that, if the U.S. application satisfied the requirements of Section 44(d) as of the U.S. application filing date, applicant may retain the priority filing date under Section 44(d) without perfecting the Section 44(e) basis, provided there is a continuing valid basis for registration.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(3)-(4); TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.03(h).  

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action  

 

 

/Justine N. Burke/

Justine N. Burke

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 121

571-270-1631

Justine.Burke@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88520897 - WANDO - N/A

To: SODEXO (hiebert@samuelsTM.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88520897 - WANDO - N/A
Sent: October 08, 2019 10:45:03 AM
Sent As: ecom121@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on October 08, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88520897

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Justine N. Burke/

Justine N. Burke

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 121

571-270-1631

Justine.Burke@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from October 08, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed