To: | Victaulic Company (trademark@fitcheven.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88507579 - N/A |
Sent: | September 27, 2019 02:18:09 PM |
Sent As: | ecom117@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88507579
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Victaulic Company
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
PRIORITY ACTION
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 27, 2019
USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Applicant must address issues shown below. On September 26, 2019, the examining attorney and Maureen Smith discussed the issues below. Applicant must timely respond to these issues. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.
PARTIAL Identification of Goods and/or Services Amendment Requirement
THIS PARTIAL REQUIREMENT APPLIES ONLY TO THE GOODS SPECIFIED THEREIN
In an identification, an applicant must use the common commercial or generic name for the goods and/or services, be specific and all-inclusive, and avoid using indefinite words or phrases. TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a). Further, applicant may amend the identification to list only those items that are within the scope of the goods and/or services set forth in the initial application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07. Scope is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §1402.07(a).
The wording “fire sprinkler systems” in the identification of goods and/or services is indefinite and must be clarified because the wording does not make clear the nature of the specific systems and could identify goods in more than one international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1401.05(d). As stated, they include a water supply system, in addition to fire sprinklers; however, “sprinkler systems for fire protection” fit in Class 9. Please see non-exhaustive suggestions below.
The current identification reads as follows:
International Class: 9 Automatically operated valves; automatic pneumatic and electrical valves; automatic fire protection valves; automatic control valves and shutoff valves all for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; flow switches for monitoring and controlling the flow of gases and liquids; pressure switches and sensors for monitoring, controlling and switching hydraulic or pneumatic systems; fire sprinklers; fire sprinkler assemblies; fire sprinkler systems, fire detection and extinguishment apparatus and control systems comprised of heat, smoke and flame detectors and sensors, automatic valves, electrical switches, fire alarms and fire sprinklers
The following wording in the current identification is acceptable, because it is sufficiently definite and properly classified:
International Class: 9 Automatically operated valves; automatic pneumatic and electrical valves; automatic fire protection valves; automatic control valves and shutoff valves all for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; flow switches for monitoring and controlling the flow of gases and liquids; pressure switches and sensors for monitoring, controlling and switching hydraulic or pneumatic systems; fire sprinklers; fire sprinkler assemblies; . . . , fire detection and extinguishment apparatus and control systems comprised of heat, smoke and flame detectors and sensors, automatic valves, electrical switches, fire alarms and fire sprinklers
Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods and/or services, if accurate:
International Class: 9 Automatically operated valves; automatic pneumatic and electrical valves; automatic fire protection valves; automatic control valves and shutoff valves all for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; flow switches for monitoring and controlling the flow of gases and liquids; pressure switches and sensors for monitoring, controlling and switching hydraulic or pneumatic systems; fire sprinklers; fire sprinkler assemblies; sprinkler systems for fire protection, fire detection and extinguishment apparatus and control systems comprised of heat, smoke and flame detectors and sensors, automatic valves, electrical switches, fire alarms and fire sprinklers
See TMEP §1402.01.
Amendment Guidelines
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
(1) Deleting the goods and/or services to which the refusal pertains;
(2) Filing a request to divide out the goods and/or services that have not been refused registration, so that the mark may proceed toward publication for opposition for those goods or services to which the refusal does not pertain. See 37 C.F.R. §2.87. See generally TMEP §§1110 et seq. (regarding the requirements for filing a request to divide). If applicant files a request to divide, then to avoid abandonment, applicant must also file a timely response to all outstanding issues in this Office action, including the refusal. 37 C.F.R. §2.87(e).; or
(3) Amending the basis for the goods and/or services identified in the refusal, if appropriate. TMEP §806.03(h).
Applicant is encouraged to telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney to resolve the issues raised in this Office action by examiner’s amendment. Although the USPTO will not accept a formal response by e-mail, an applicant may communicate informally by phone or e-mail with the trademark examining attorney to agree to a proposed amendment to the application that will immediately place the application in condition for publication for opposition, issuance of a registration, or suspension. See 37 C.F.R. §2.62(c); TMEP §707.
Alternatively, applicant may expedite prosecution of this application by filing its response to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), which is available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Tina H. Mai/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 117
571-272-4110
tina.mai@uspto.gov (for informal communications)
RESPONSE GUIDANCE