To: | FEEDVISOR LTD (trademark@cll.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88500192 - BRANDSPHERE - 30694.008 |
Sent: | September 22, 2019 02:26:43 PM |
Sent As: | ecom119@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88500192
Mark: BRANDSPHERE
|
|
Correspondence Address: COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.
|
|
Applicant: FEEDVISOR LTD
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 30694.008
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 22, 2019
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
ENTITY UNCERTAIN
Applicant sets forth in the application the legal entity “company” and applicant’s country of organization as Israel. The designation “company” (or the abbreviation “co.”) is typically an acceptable entity designation in a U.S. application for applicants from Commonwealth countries. See TMEP §803.03(i). However, applicant has identified an address and/or country of organization that is not a Commonwealth country (see http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/142227/members/).
Therefore, applicant must clarify the legal entity in the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(3), 2.61(b); TMEP §803.03(i). Applicant may do so by (1) specifying the entity type that would be the equivalent of a “company” in the United States or (2) providing a description of the nature of the foreign entity that is applying. See TMEP §803.03(i).
Applicant may clarify the record by indicating that it is a “Limited Company”.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/John M.C. Kelly/
John M.C. Kelly
Examining Attorney
Law Office 119
571-272-9412
john.kelly@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE