To: | MAXIMA TECHNOLOGIES & SYSTEMS, LLC (mkeipdocket@michaelbest.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88499479 - MAXAI - 206624-5020 |
Sent: | September 25, 2019 06:49:56 PM |
Sent As: | ecom110@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88499479
Mark: MAXAI
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: MAXIMA TECHNOLOGIES & SYSTEMS, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 206624-5020
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
PRIORITY ACTION
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 25, 2019
USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Applicant must address issues shown below. On September 25, 2019, the examining attorney and Christine Filarski discussed the issues below. Applicant must timely respond to these issues. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.
· Identification of Goods Requires Clarification
Identification of Goods Requires Clarification
The identification for “engine monitoring systems” in International Class 9 is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified because the wording does not make clear the nature of the specific systems and could identify goods in more than one international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1401.05(d). For example, “lawn-care systems comprised of herbicides, pesticides, and lawn sprinklers” are in International Class 5, and “lawn-care systems comprised of lawn mowers and herbicides” are in International Class 7.
Applicant must clarify the goods by (1) describing the nature, purpose, or use of the system; and (2) listing the system’s parts or components, using common generic terms and referencing the primary parts or components of the system first. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1401.05(d), 1402.01, 1402.03(a). Additionally, this wording should be classified in the same international class as the primary parts or components of the system. See TMEP §1401.05(d).
The following amendments are suggested, if accurate (added language in bold; deleted language struck; requests for further information
in bold and italicized):
Class 9: Electronic display interfaces
for advanced instrumentation display and; engine monitoring system composed of {specify components,
e.g., computerized vehicle engine analyzers, thermostats as vehicle engine parts, computer hardware, computer software for analyzing vehicle engine functions}
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Response Guidelines
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
Dinisha Nitkin
/dn/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 110
(571) 272-0212
dinisha.nitkin@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE