Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  September 20, 2019

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

I.         SEARCH OF THE OFFICE RECORDS

 

Prior Pending Application

The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTO’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no similar registered marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  During a search of the Office’s records however, the examining attorney discovered a potentially conflicting mark in a prior-filed pending application may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark.

 

Information regarding U.S. Application Serial No. 88487726 is enclosed.  The actual or effective filing date of referenced application precedes the applicant’s filing date.  (See attached referenced application.)  If the mark in the referenced application registers, the applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion between the respective marks.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, upon receipt of the applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced application.

 

In response to this Office action, the applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between the applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application.  The applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits the applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.

 

II.        INFORMALITIES

 

If the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond to the following issue(s):

 

Application Refused—Disclaimer Required

In this case, the applicant must insert a disclaimer statement for the term MEDICAL.  The Office can require an applicant to disclaim exclusive rights to an unregistrable part of a mark, rather than refuse registration of the entire mark. Trademark Act Section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. §1056(a).  Under Trademark Act Section 2(e), the Office can refuse registration of the entire mark where it is determined that the entire mark is merely descriptive, deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive of the goods. 15 U.S.C. §1052(e).  Thus, the Office may require an applicant to disclaim a portion of a mark that, when used in connection with the goods or services, is merely descriptive, deceptively misdescriptive, primarily geographically descriptive, or otherwise unregistrable (e.g., generic). TMEP §§1213, 1213.03.  If an applicant does not comply with a disclaimer requirement, the Office may refuse registration of the entire mark. TMEP §§1213.01(b).

 

A disclaimer does not remove the disclaimed matter from the mark nor does it affect the appearance of the applied-for mark. TMEP §§1213.10.  A “disclaimer” is a written statement that an applicant adds to the application record to indicate that the applicant does not have exclusive rights to the particular disclaimed wording and/or design separate and apart from the entire mark as shown in the drawing. TMEP §§1213, 1213.10.  The following cases explain the disclaimer requirement more fully:  Dena Corp. v. Belvedere Int’l Inc., 950 F.2d 1555, 21 USPQ2d 1047 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Brown-Forman Corp., 81 USPQ2d 1284 (TTAB 2006); In re Kraft, Inc., 218 USPQ 571 (TTAB 1983); In re EBS Data Processing, Inc., 212 USPQ 964 (TTAB 1981); In re National Presto Industries, Inc., 197 USPQ 188 (TTAB 1977).

 

The term “MEDICAL” merely describes a feature, quality, or characteristic of the applicant’s products.  The definition of the MEDICAL is “relating to medicine and the treatment of injuries and diseases”.[1]  In this case, the term MEDICAL immediately informs consumers that the applicant’s goods are intended to be used in the field of medicine for the treatment of injuries or diseases.

 

Because the term is descriptive in relation to the applicant’s identified medical diagnostic and treatment goods, the applicant must insert a disclaimer of the term “MEDICAL” in the application. See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).

 

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “MEDICAL” apart from the mark as shown.

 

TMEP §1213.08(a)(i); see In re Owatonna Tool Co., 231 USPQ 493, 494 (Comm’r Pats. 1983).

 

For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.

 

Application Refused—Applicant Improperly Identified the Software in International Class 009 ONLY

The applicant has provided this Office with the following identification:

 

Data processing equipment, namely, data processors and computer software, namely, analysis software for diagnosing sleep issues and disorders, in International Class 009; and

 

Medical and dental apparatus and instruments, namely, medical diagnostics apparatus for diagnosing sleep issues and disorders, in International Class 010.

 

The current identification needs clarification because it could include goods and services classified in other international classes. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  Specifically, the proper classification of the applicant’s software depends on its nature. 

 

Computer software is considered a product properly classified in International Class 009 if it is (1) recorded on media (such as CDs) or (2) downloadable and thus can be transferred or copied from a remote computer system for use on a long-term basis.  TMEP §1402.03(d).  Providing on-line non-downloadable software however, is considered to be a computer service properly classified in International Class 042, unless it is non-downloadable game software provided online or for temporary use, which is classified in International Class 041.  See TMEP §§1402.03(d), 1402.11(a)(xii).  Therefore, to ensure proper classification of the noted software, the applicant must indicate whether its software program is considered a good that is prerecorded on media or downloadable, or whether it is providing a computer service featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software.

 

Accordingly, as more fully detailed below, the applicant must (1) add one or more International Class(es) to the application, and reclassify the goods and services therein, or (2) delete the goods and services from the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.86, 6.1; TMEP §§1403 et seq.  If the applicant adds one or more International Classes to the application, the applicant must comply with the multiple-class requirements specified in this Office action.

 

The applicant must amend the recitation to specify the common, ordinary commercial name of the goods and services.  If there is no common commercial name for the products and services, the applicant must adequately describe the nature of the goods and services, using wording that would be generally understood by the average person.  See Cal. Spray-Chem. Corp. v. Osmose Wood Pres. Co. of Am., 102 USPQ 321, 322 (Comm’r Pats. 1954); Schenley Indus., Inc. v. Battistoni, 112 USPQ 485, 486 (Comm’r Pats. 1957); TMEP §1402.01.  In such a case, the applicant should describe the nature of the goods and services and their main purpose, as well as indicate the channel of trade, intended consumer and intended use(s). 

 

Please Note:  The applicant’s proposed identification for International Class 010 is acceptable as currently written and made part of the application.  This identification requirement does not pertain to the goods listed in that international class.

 

The applicant may amend the identification to substitute the following wording, if accurate:

 

Proposed identification for International Class 009:

 

Data processing equipment, namely, data processors and recorded or downloadable computer analysis software for diagnosing sleep issues and disorders.

 

Proposed identification for International Class 042:

 

Providing a website featuring non-downloadable computer analysis software for diagnosing sleep issues and disorders; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer analysis software for diagnosing sleep issues and disorders.

 

PLEASE NOTE:  General Guidelines Regarding the Scope of Acceptable Identification Amendments

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  The applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; for example, an applicant may amend an identification or recitation from the more general to the specific; it may not amend from the specific to the more general. TMEP §§1402.06(b).

 

The applicant however may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).   Thus, the applicant may not subsequently amend the identification to include any product or service that is not within the scope of the goods and/or services originally set forth in the application or a previously accepted identification amendment thereto.

 

Online Identification Reference Provided by the USPTO

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Requirements for a Multiple-Class Application

The application references goods and/or services based on use in commerce in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class:

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  Specifically, the application identifies goods and/or services based on use in commerce that are classified in at least three (3) international classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only two (2) international classes.  Applicant must either (a) submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or (b) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

(3)       Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class.  See more information about verified dates of use.

 

(4)       Submit a specimen for each international class.  The current specimen is acceptable for International Class(es) 009 and 010; and if applicable, the applicant needs to submit a specimen for International Class(es) 042. See more information about specimens.

 

            Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and website printouts that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services. 

 

(5)       Submit a verified statement that “The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application.”  See more information about verification.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP §§904, 1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

Applicant’s Response

There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action.  For this application to proceed further, the applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action.  If the action includes a refusal, the applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register.  The applicant may also have other options specified in this Office action for responding to a refusal and should consider those options carefully.  To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, the applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements.  For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” on the USPTO’s website.

 

If the applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register.  See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§718.01, 718.02.  Additionally, the USPTO will not refund the application filing fee, which is a required processing fee.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iv), 2.209(a); TMEP §405.04.

 

When an application has abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714.  The petition must be filed within two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(a)(1), (b)(1)

 

Responses to Office actions must be properly signed.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2); TMEP §§712, 712.01.  If an applicant is not represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner).  See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §§611.03(b), 611.06(b)-(h), 712.01.  In the case of joint applicants, all must sign.  37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §611.06(a). 

 

If an applicant is represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney authorized to practice before the USPTO, the attorney must sign the response.  37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(i); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01.  The only attorneys who may sign responses are (1) attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state or territory, or (2) Canadian trademark attorneys or agents reciprocally recognized by the USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) who are appointed in connection with a U.S.-licensed attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 11.14(a), (c), (e).  Foreign attorneys, other than recognized Canadian trademark attorneys or agents, do not have authority to sign responses.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(c)(1), (e).  If an applicant is initially represented by an attorney, and then later retains another U.S.-licensed attorney from a different firm, the newly retained attorney may not sign responses until the applicant files a new power and/or revocation of attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.18(a)(7); TMEP §604.03.

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  If the applicant has technical questions about the TEAS response to Office action form, applicant can review the electronic filing tips available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eFilingTips.htm and email technical questions to TEAS@uspto.gov.

 

If the applicant or its appointed attorney has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

/Michael Tanner/

Michael Tanner

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 119

Telephone: 571-272-9706

Email: Michael.Tanner@uspto.gov

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action  

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.