To: | Landig + Lava GmbH & Co. KG (BrenemanLaw@aol.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88488752 - DRYAGER - N/A |
Sent: | September 28, 2019 04:44:52 PM |
Sent As: | ecom122@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88488752
Mark: DRYAGER
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Landig + Lava GmbH & Co. KG
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 28, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
However, applicant must respond to the following refusal and requirements.
SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL - MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
A mark is merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of an applicant’s goods. TMEP §1209.01(b); see, e.g., In re TriVita, Inc., 783 F.3d 872, 874, 114 USPQ2d 1574, 1575 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 1173, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); In re Steelbuilding.com, 415 F.3d 1293, 1297, 75 USPQ2d 1420, 1421 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citing Estate of P.D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Comm’r of Patents, 252 U.S. 538, 543 (1920)).
In the present case, applicant has applied to register the mark DRYAGER for “Food processor cabinets, namely, equipment to display and control temperature, humidity and moisture contents of foods, namely, nuts, fruits, vegetables and meats and related control panels and displays, sterilization devices, air, temperature and humidity control devices, filters, namely, active carbon filters, shelves, hangars, display podiums, saltwall systems, wall holders, labels, S-hooks, swivel hooks, UVC bulbs and related accessories” in International Class 011.
Here, the wording in the mark is defined as follows:
Moreover, the attached evidence from Artofmanliness.com shows that in the meat production industry, “dry-aging” is a process in which “moisture is drawn out of the meat.” In addition, applicant’s specimen of record indicates that its goods are used for the purpose of “Dry aging” as it reads in pertinent part, the “The longer the beef is hung in the Dryager, Dry Aging Cabinet, the more intensive the flavor becomes.” Accordingly, the wording DRYAGER in the applied-for mark immediately conveys to consumers information about applicant’s goods, namely, that applicant provides food processor cabinets and related accessories for the purpose of aging meats by means of withdrawing moisture.
Therefore, the applied-for mark is merely descriptive of the purpose of applicant’s goods. Thus, registration is refused pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act.
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIREMENT
In an identification, an applicant must use the common commercial or generic name for the goods, be specific and all-inclusive, and avoid using indefinite words or phrases. TMEP§§1402.01, 1402.03(a). Further, applicant may amend the identification to list only those items that are within the scope of the goods set forth in the initial application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07. Scope is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §1402.07(a).
Applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate:
International Class 006: “Labels of metal; metal S-hooks; metal swivel hooks”
International Class 009: “Electronic control panels for controlling temperature, humidity, and moisture content of foods, namely, nuts, fruits, vegetables and meats; electronic numeric displays for displaying temperature, humidity, and moisture content of foods, namely, nuts, fruits, vegetables and meats”
International Class 011: “Food processor cabinets, namely, cabinets used to display and control temperature, humidity, and moisture content of foods, namely, nuts, fruits, vegetables and meats;, sterilization devices, namely, sterilizers not for medical purposes; air temperature control device, namely, air conditioners; humidity control devices, namely, {specify type in International Class 011}; air filtering installations, namely, active carbon filters; refrigerator shelving; UVC light bulbs”
International Class 016: “Paper labels”
International Class 020: “Plastic labels; non-metal S-hooks; non-metal swivel hooks”
International Class 024: “Labels of textile”
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
CLARIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF CLASSES FOR WHICH REGISTRATION IS SOUGHT REQUIREMENT
Applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid, or (2) submit the fees for each additional class.
The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a). See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.
MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ADVISORY
The application references goods based on use in commerce in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class:
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fees already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).
(3) Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class. See more information about verified dates of use.
(4) Submit a specimen for each international class. The current specimen is acceptable for International Class 011; and applicant needs a specimen for International classes 006, 009, 016, 020 and 024. See more information about specimens.
Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, and photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.
(5) Submit a verified statement that “The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application.” See more information about verification.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP §§904, 1403.01, 1403.02(c).
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
CLARIFICATION OF LEGAL ENTITY REQUIREMENT
Alternatively, if applicant maintains that the legal entity in the application properly identifies applicant’s entity type, applicant must provide an explanation as to why the identified entity type is more similar to a “Limited liability company” in this instance than to the legal entities listed in TMEP Appendix D. See id.
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration will be refused because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Obieze Mmeje/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 122
(571) 272-7694
Obieze.Mmeje@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE