To: | TMFG. LLC (jason@attorneyjasoncline.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88480816 - REMEDI - N/A |
Sent: | March 24, 2020 10:12:06 PM |
Sent As: | ecom114@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88480816
Mark: REMEDI
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: TMFG. LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: March 24, 2020
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
This application was previously suspended pending the disposition of a prior filed application. That application is still pending. However, a recently filed application has an earlier effective filing date that applicant’s mark, and therefore may present a likelihood of confusion refusal if it registers.
For applications based on Section 1, the effective filing date is the date the application is filed with the USPTO. See TMEP §§201, -.01, 1208.01(b). However, for applications claiming a “priority” filing date under Section 44(d) or 67, the effective filing date can be up to six months earlier than the date the application is filed in the United States. See 15 U.S.C. §§1126(d), 1141g; TMEP §§206.02, 1003.02, 1208.01(b).
In this case, U.S. Application Serial No. 79279533 has an effective filing date that precedes applicant’s effective filing date because of a claim of priority under Section 44(d) or 67. Accordingly, if the mark in the application(s) Serial No(s). 79279533 registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application(s) below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application is provided in this letter.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
Bechhofer, Yocheved
/Yocheved Bechhofer/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 114
571-272-9329
Yocheved.Bechhofer@uspto.gov