Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE

SERIAL NUMBER:            88471357

DATE:                                09/16/2019

NAME:                               knicholson1

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
    X   phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search       X   Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

     OTHER:

From: Daniel J. Smola <DSmola@hahnlaw.com>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:11 AM
To: Nicholson, Kerry <Kerry.Nicholson@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: IP Docket <ipdocket@hahnlaw.com>; Michelle Pittman <MPittman@hahnlaw.com>
Subject: RE: From the USPTO: Amendment to APTERYX (Ser. No. 88471357) Application; Our Ref: 116385.00264

 

Dear Examining Attorney Nicholson,

 

Please proceed with the Examiner’s Amendment/Priority Action so I can pay the additional fee for Class 10.

 

Sincerely,
Dan

 

Daniel J. Smola | Partner | Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP Intellectual Property Law Tel: 216-274-2202 | Fax: 216-241-2824 dsmola@hahnlaw.com | hahnlaw.com 200 Public Square, Suite 2800, Cleveland, OH 44114

Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP is a full-service law firm with a national footprint and international reach, with offices in Cleveland │ Columbus │ Chicago │San Diego │ Naples │Fort Myers   This email may contain information that is confidential or privileged, and it is intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying, or distributing this email, its contents, or any attachment.

 

 

From: Nicholson, Kerry <Kerry.Nicholson@USPTO.GOV>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 10:35 AM
To: Daniel J. Smola <DSmola@hahnlaw.com>
Cc: Trademarks <trademarks@hahnlaw.com>; Michelle Pittman <MPittman@hahnlaw.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: From the USPTO: Amendment to APTERYX (Ser. No. 88471357) Application; Our Ref: 116385.00264

 

Dear Mr. Smola,

 

Actually, “dental imaging devices” are classified in class 10 since it’s a medical apparatus.  So, the applicant would have to add Class 10 or amend to “Non-medical imaging devices for {indicate, e.g., gemstones, roots, etc.}” or some other class 9 device.

 

Thanks,

 

Kerry A. Nicholson

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 120

United States Patent & Trademark Office

(571) 272-5159

 

From: Daniel J. Smola <DSmola@hahnlaw.com>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 9:50 AM
To: Nicholson, Kerry <Kerry.Nicholson@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Trademarks <trademarks@hahnlaw.com>; Michelle Pittman <MPittman@hahnlaw.com>
Subject: RE: From the USPTO: Amendment to APTERYX (Ser. No. 88471357) Application; Our Ref: 116385.00264

 

Dear Examining Attorney Nicholson,

 

The Applicant proposes the following amendment to the identification of goods:

 

• Class 9: image acquisition hardware, namely, intraoral and extraoral digital dental imaging devices; x-ray imaging sensors; computer hardware