To: | Xyleco Inc. (whiptrademark@wilmerhale.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88466735 - XYLECOSE - 2209787.156 |
Sent: | September 03, 2019 11:22:17 AM |
Sent As: | ecom123@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88466735
Mark: XYLECOSE
|
|
Correspondence Address: MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA, ESQUIRE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LL
|
|
Applicant: Xyleco Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 2209787.156
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 03, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Applicant is encouraged to telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney to resolve the issues raised in this Office action by examiner’s amendment. Although the USPTO will not accept a formal response by e-mail, an applicant may communicate informally by phone or e-mail with the trademark examining attorney to agree to a proposed amendment to the application that will immediately place the application in condition for publication for opposition, issuance of a registration, or suspension. See 37 C.F.R. §2.62(c); TMEP §707.
· Amendment of Identification of Goods Required
· Significance Inquiry
· Advisory: Application is Duplicate of Registration
· U.S.-Licensed Attorney Bar Information and Attestation Required
AMENDMENT OF IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRED
Applicant should note that descriptions of goods found acceptable in earlier-filed applications and registrations do not always remain acceptable when adopted in later-filed applications. See TMEP §§702.03(a)(iv), 1402.14. Identifications of goods are examined in accordance with the Trademark Rules of Practice and the USPTO’s policies and procedures in effect on the date an application is filed (although an applicant may voluntarily choose to follow policies and procedures adopted after the application was filed). See 37 C.F.R. §2.85(e)(1)-(e)(2); TMEP §§1401.09, 1402.14. The USPTO’s rules and policies with respect to identifications of goods are updated periodically to reflect changes in the marketplace and technology as well as changes to the international classification system. See TMEP §1402.14. For guidance on drafting acceptable identifications of goods, use the USPTO’s online U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual (ID Manual), which is continually updated in accordance with prevailing rules and policies. See TMEP §1402.04.
Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
International Class 001: “Processed, semi-processed, unprocessed, natural and artificial cellulose, lignocellulose, sugar and [specify type of starch particles within this International Class, e.g., plant] starch particles, [specify type of pulp within this International Class, e.g., beet, fruit, rice, wood] pulp, and [specify type of fibers within this International Class, e.g., beet, fruit, wood] fibers for use in the manufacture of sweeteners; chemicals and chemical additives for use in the manufacture of textiles, pharmaceuticals, and nutraceuticals”
International Class 005: “Pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals, namely, energy supplements in the nature of nutritional supplements”
International Class 030: “Processed, semi-processed, unprocessed, natural and artificial cellulose, lignocellulose, sugar and food starch particles, [specify type of pulp within this
International Class, e.g., beet, fruit, rice] pulp, and fibers, for use as food and as an additive to food for non-nutritional purposes for use as a
flavoring”
International Class 031: “Processed,
semi-processed, unprocessed, natural and artificial cellulose, lignocellulose, sugar and [specify type of starch particles within this International Class, e.g., plant] starch particles, [specify type of pulp within this International Class, e.g., wood] pulp, and [specify type of fibers within this International Class, e.g., wood] fibers, for use as animal feed and/or as an additive to animal feed for non-nutritional
purposes for use as an ingredient or filler”
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
SIGNIFICANCE INQUIRY
ADVISORY: APPLICATION IS DUPLICATE OF REGISTRATION
This application appears to be an exact duplicate of U.S. Registration No. 4342783. 37 C.F.R. §2.48; TMEP §703. See the attached registration. The USPTO will not issue duplicate registrations. 37 C.F.R. §2.48; TMEP §703.
If after the amendment of the identification of goods, the application is still an exact duplicate, the application will be refused.
Applicant may also respond to this refusal by abandoning the application or surrendering the registration. To expressly abandon the application, an applicant should use the TEAS Request for Express Abandonment (Withdrawal) of Application form; to surrender the registration, the TEAS Surrender of registration for cancellation form should be used.
U.S.-LICENSED ATTORNEY BAR INFORMATION AND ATTESTATION REQUIRED
If the applicant has any questions or requires assistance in responding to this Office Action, please contact the examining attorney at the contact information provided below. Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
Yi, Crystal
/Crystal H. Yi/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 123
571.270.0763
crystal.yi@uspto.gov
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
RESPONSE GUIDANCE