To: | Robert Bosch Tool Corporation (tc@pattishall.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88463653 - VISIMAX - 98700-628 |
Sent: | August 31, 2019 10:18:24 AM |
Sent As: | ecom107@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88463653
Mark: VISIMAX
|
|
Correspondence Address: Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2900
|
|
Applicant: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 98700-628
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 31, 2019
The referenced application and preliminary amendment have been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search Results
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Verified Statement in Support of Application is Incomplete
The declaration in the application is not acceptable because it omits some of the assurances required under 37 C.F.R. §§2.33 and/or 2.34. TMEP §804.02. Specifically, the following was omitted: “The applicant is using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services in the application and was using the mark in commerce as of the application filing date”. Applicant must therefore submit the above assurance, properly verified in an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.33(a)-(b)(1), 2.34(a)(1)(i); TMEP §804.02. For more information about this, see the Verified statement webpage.
To provide this verified statement. After opening the correct TEAS form, answer “yes” to wizard question #10, and follow the instructions within the form for signing. In this case, the form will require two signatures: one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the “Response Signature” section.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Nelson B. Snyder III/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 107
571-272-9284
nelson.snyder@uspto.gov (Informal comms only
RESPONSE GUIDANCE