Offc Action Outgoing

IPAR

KYANA PACKAGING SOLUTIONS

Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88456732

 

Mark:  IPAR

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

DAVID W. CARRITHERS

CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE, PLLC

120 W. STEPHEN FOSTER AVE, SUITE 101

BARDSTOWN, KY 40004

 

 

 

Applicant:  KYANA PACKAGING SOLUTIONS

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. AV1262017.2

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date: 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

Search Results

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:

  • Requirement – Amend Identification of Services
  • Advisory – Multi-Class Application
  • Requirement – Amend Mark Description and Color Claim

 

REQUIREMENT – AMEND IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES

 

The wording “industrial packaging production line automation services” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the specific nature and classification of the services is unclear. For example, “industrial packaging production line automation services, namely, technical advice concerning the installation, repair and maintenance of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used for automated or partly automated industrial operations” is in Class 37, while “industrial packaging production line automation services, namely, consulting services in the field of workplace automation” is in Class 42.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:  

 

Class 35: Industrial packaging production line automation services, namely, [specify type, such as business management and administration of automated packaging production line equipment for others]

 

Class 37: Industrial packaging production line automation services, namely, [specify type, such as technical advice concerning the installation, repair and maintenance of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used for automated or partly automated industrial operations]

 

Class 40: Industrial packaging production line automation services, namely, [specify type, such as custom manufacture of automated product packaging equipment]

 

Class 41: Industrial packaging product line automation services, namely, [specify type, such as providing training and courses of instruction in the field of automated packaging production line equipment and systems]

 

Class 42: Industrial packaging production line automation services, namely, [specify type, such as consulting services in the field of workplace automation, design and development of automated packaging production line equipment, etc.]; package redesign services

 

Applicant’s services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different services or add services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the services will further limit scope, and once services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Advisory – Multi-Class Application

 

The application references services based on use in commerce in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class:

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  Specifically, the application identifies services based on use in commerce that are classified in at least five classes; however, applicant submitted a fee sufficient for only one class.  Applicant must either (a) submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or (b) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

(3)       Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class.  See more information about verified dates of use.

 

(4)       Submit a specimen for each international class.  The current specimen is acceptable for classes 35, 37, and 42; and applicant needs a specimen for classes 40 and 41.  See more information about specimens.

 

            Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and website printouts that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  

 

(5)       Submit a verified statement that “The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application. See more information about verification.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP §§904, 1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

REQUIREMENT – AMEND MARK DESCRIPTION AND COLOR CLAIM

 

Applicant must provide an amended description of the mark that includes all the literal and design elements and colors shown in the mark.  Specifically, the following elements and colors have been omitted:  light blue, and the gray incomplete circle within the blue circle.

 

A complete description must identify all the literal and design elements in the mark and specify where the colors appear in those elements.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq. 

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:

 

The colors light blue, blue, green, and gray are claimed as a feature of the mark.

 

The mark consists of a light blue circle bordered in gray which contains an incomplete inner gray circle. Superimposed through the top of the circle is a green “I” followed by the wording “PAR” in a blue edged in gray font.

 

Assistance

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the requirements in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action  

 

 

/Joan M. Blazich/

Joan M. Blazich

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 122

United States Patent and Trademark Office

(571) 272-7810

joan

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed