United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88452421
Mark: LETTERMARK
|
|
Correspondence Address: 100 NORTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 4700
|
|
Applicant: Domtar Paper Company, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 042481.332
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 23, 2019
The present Office action issues, because the Examining Attorney’s signature block was not included with the previous Nonfinal Office Action issued today, August 23, 2019. There are no other changes to the letter. The examining attorney apologizes for any confusion.
Search Results
Advisory: Summary of Issues
1. Refusal: Merely Descriptive – Section 2(e)(1)
2. Requirement for More Information
3. Requirement: U.S. Licensed Attorney Bar Information
4. Requirement: U.S. Licensed Attorney Attestation
5. Advisory: Response Guidelines
Refusal: Merely Descriptive – Section 2(e)(1)
“Whether consumers could guess what the product [or service] is from consideration of the mark alone is not the test.” In re Am. Greetings Corp., 226 USPQ 365, 366 (TTAB 1985).
Here, applicant’s mark is LETTERMARK for “Copy paper, printing paper, writing paper, recycled paper for printing, colored printing paper, punched and perforated paper” in Class 016.
Specifically, the attached evidence Internet websites from makers, sellers and commentators about stationery shows this wording means, “A lettermark is a typography-based logo that's comprised of a few letters, usually a company's initials. It uses text to create a unique typographic mark. Similar to a lettermark, a wordmark logo is a font-based logo that focuses on a business’ name alone.” http://bashooka.com/inspiration/40-creative-lettermark-wordmark-logo-designs/ (emphasis in the original). Therefore, the wording merely describes a feature of applicant’s printed writing paper, e.g. a purchaser may wish to purchase its writing paper featuring its own lettermark.
The trademark examining attorney refers to the attached Internet website excerpts in which LETTERMARK is used in reference to “copy paper, printing paper, writing paper, recycled paper for printing, colored printing paper, punched and perforated paper.” See attachments.
http://www.designbolts.com/2016/07/27/difference-between-wordmark-lettermark-brandmark/
http://www.brandcrowd.com/maker/tag/lettermark
http://99designs.com/blog/tips/types-of-logos/
http://www.jessicajonesdesign.com/types-of-logos/
http://uwf.edu/brand/logo-basics/uwf-lettermark/
Therefore, LETTERMARK describes a feature of applicant’s goods. Accordingly, the examining attorney refuses registration of the mark as merely descriptive under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1).
Requirement for More Information
(1) Fact sheets, instruction manuals, brochures, advertisements and pertinent screenshots of applicant’s website as it relates to the goods in the application, including any materials using the terms in the applied-for mark. Merely stating that information about the goods is available on applicant’s website is insufficient to make the information of record.;
(2) If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for goods and services of the same type, explaining how its own product or services will differ. If the goods feature new technology and information regarding competing goods is not available, applicant must provide a detailed factual description of the goods. Factual information about the goods must make clear how they operate, salient features, and prospective customers and channels of trade. For services, the factual information must make clear what the services are and how they are rendered, salient features, and prospective customers and channels of trade. Conclusory statements will not satisfy this requirement.; and
(3) Applicant must respond to the following questions:
1. Do applicant’s paper goods feature lettermarks or letter marks?
2. Do applicant’s paper goods feature logos that are comprised of a few letters?
3. Do applicant’s paper goods feature logos that are comprised of a company's initials?
4. Do applicant’s competitors use lettermarks or letter marks to advertise similar goods?
5. Who is the typical consumer of applicant’s goods?
6. Where are applicant’s goods typically purchased, e.g. online or brick-and-mortar store venues?
See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§814, 1402.01(e).
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.
U.S. Licensed Attorney: Attorney Bar Information
U.S. Licensed Attorney: Attorney Attestation
Advisory: Response Guidelines
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Gilbert M. Swift/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 109
Tel. 1+(571) 272-9028
Gilbert.Swift@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE