To: | Textile-Based Delivery, Inc. (bandia@greensborolaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88443087 - NUFABRX - N/A |
Sent: | August 16, 2019 05:13:32 PM |
Sent As: | ecom128@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88443087
Mark: NUFABRX
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Textile-Based Delivery, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 16, 2019
Specimen unacceptable – REFUSAL
Registration is refused because the specimens do not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in International Class 22. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
Specifically, the specimen consists of an invoice sent to an entity on May 29, 2019, for the purchase of capsaicin yarn. Thus, this invoice does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce but demonstrates the applicant carrying out a business dealing. The specimen of record also provides a “Material Handling Data Sheet” and various “Messaging Guidelines” that do not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce but demonstrates the applicant carrying out internal businesses as these sheets and guidelines are marked as “Proprietary and Confidential.”
Further, the mark does not appear anywhere on the specimen submitted as page 8 of the application. Thus, that specimen fails to show the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(f)(i), (g)(i).
Lastly, the specimen submitted as page 9 of the application shows a photograph of the fiber goods with the applied-for mark “NUFABRX” printed on a piece of paper and taped into the inside of a fiber roll. However, the label appears to be temporarily placed on only one of the rolls in the photographs and is not affixed to the others. Accordingly, the specimen appears to consist of a mock-up of the mark on the goods or their packaging and does not show the applied-for mark in actual use in commerce. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. See TMEP §§904.03 et seq. Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods. TMEP §904.03(i).
Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:
(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.
(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.
For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.
Step-by-Step Instructions For Submitting a Substitute Specimen
To submit a verified substitute specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, applicant should:
(1) Answer “Yes” to form wizard question #2; and then, continuing on to the next portion of the form, do the following for each relevant class for which a substitute specimen is being submitted;
(2) Under “Classification and Listing of Goods/Services/Collective Membership Organization,” select the following statement, “Check here to modify the current classification number; listing of goods/services; dates of use; and/or filing basis; or to submit a substitute specimen or foreign registration certificate. If not checked, the changes will be ignored.”;
(3) Under “Specimen File,” attach a specimen (attachment may not exceed 5 megabytes);
(4) Describe what the specimen consists of; and
(5) Select the following statement: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application”
Note: When submitting a verified substitute specimen, the TEAS online response form requires TWO signatures: one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the “Response Signature” section.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Olivia S. Lee/
Olivia S. Lee
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 128
(571) 272-6848
olivia.lee@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE