To: | ProSight Global, Inc. (dctrademarks@dlapiper.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88436022 - WE ARE PROS - N/A |
Sent: | August 12, 2019 07:52:22 PM |
Sent As: | ecom106@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88436022
Mark: WE ARE PROS
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: ProSight Global, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 12, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
PRELIMINARY AMENDMENT
The proposed mark amendment filed on June 9, 2019, is accepted and entered into the record.
SEARCH OF OFFICE RECORDS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
TRADEMARK ACT SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL – MARK IS MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes a feature of applicant’s services. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.
“Whether consumers could guess what the product [or service] is from consideration of the mark alone is not the test.” In re Am. Greetings Corp., 226 USPQ 365, 366 (TTAB 1985).
The applicant seeks registration of WE ARE PROS, in standard characters, for use with insurance administration; insurance brokerage; insurance consultation; and insurance underwriting in the field of property and casualty insurance.
A “pro” is an abbreviation for “professional” and also means “someone who has a lot of experience at something and can do it very well.” Macmillan Dictionary, (2019). As demonstrated by the attached sampling of service provider websites, including insurance company websites, the wording “we are pros” is used in a merely descriptive manner to refer to a party’s ability to provide a particular service. Similarly, here, the proposed mark would simply be perceived by consumers as a statement that the services are provided by professionals and touting the quality of the applicant’s insurance provider services. Accordingly, the proposed mark is merely descriptive for the services and registration must be refused under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTANT OFFICE ACTION
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Martha L. Fromm/
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Law Office 106
571-272-9320
Martha.Fromm@USPTO.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE