Priority Action

SIMPLE INGREDIENTS, BETTER CHOICES

GRUMA CORPORATION

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88429829 - SIMPLE INGREDIENTS, BETTER CHOICES - 5139.206.US

To: GRUMA CORPORATION (jmcdocket@fbfk.law)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88429829 - SIMPLE INGREDIENTS, BETTER CHOICES - 5139.206.US
Sent: August 05, 2019 09:19:15 AM
Sent As: ecom109@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88429829

 

Mark:  SIMPLE INGREDIENTS, BETTER CHOICES

 

 

        

 

Correspondence Address: 

       JOHN M. CONE

       FERGUSON BRASWELL FRASER KUBASTA PC

       2500 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 600

       PLANO TX 75093

      

 

 

 

 

Applicant:  GRUMA CORPORATION

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 5139.206.US

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

       jmcdocket@fbfk.law

 

 

 

PRIORITY ACTION

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.

 

 

Issue date:  August 05, 2019

 

 

 

USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found.  The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

Applicant must address issues shown below.  On August 1, 2019, the examining attorney and John M. Cone discussed the issues below.  Applicant must timely respond to these issues.  See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

Application Informalities

 

Identification of Goods

 

A portion of the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite because the goods listed were not specific enough.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.

 

Specifically, the wording “including” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be deleted and replaced with a definite term, such as “namely,” “consisting of,” “particularly,” or “in particular.”  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a).  The identification must be specific and all-inclusive.  This wording is an open-ended term (e.g., “including,” “such as”) that is not acceptable because it fails to identify specific goods.  See TMEP §1402.03(a). 

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

Class 30: Tortillas, tortilla chips, snack foods, namely, corn-based snack foods, grain-based snack foods”   

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

Please note that, while the identification of services may be amended to clarify or limit the services, adding to the services or broadening the scope of the services is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include services that are not within the scope of the services set forth in the present identification.

 

If applicant does not respond to this Office action within the six-month period for response, the following goods in International Class 30 will be deleted from the application: snack foods, including”.  The application will then proceed with the following goods in International Class 30 only: tortillas, tortilla chips, corn-based snack foods, grain-based snack foods”.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)-(a)(1); TMEP §718.02(a).

 

Response

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

 

/David Collier/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 109

(571) 272-8859

david.collier@uspto.gov (not for formal responses)

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88429829 - SIMPLE INGREDIENTS, BETTER CHOICES - 5139.206.US

To: GRUMA CORPORATION (jmcdocket@fbfk.law)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88429829 - SIMPLE INGREDIENTS, BETTER CHOICES - 5139.206.US
Sent: August 05, 2019 09:19:17 AM
Sent As: ecom109@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on August 05, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88429829

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/David Collier/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 109

(571) 272-8859

david.collier@uspto.gov (not for formal responses)

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from August 05, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed