NOTE TO THE FILE
SERIAL NUMBER: 88429585
DATE: 08/22/2019
NAME: ahayes
NOTE:
Searched:
Lexis/Nexis
OneLook
Wikipedia
Acronym Finder Protest evidence reviewed
Other:Checked:
Geographic significance
Surname
Translation
ID with ID/CLASS mailboxChecked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents
Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
phone Left message with
X email Attorney/ApplicantRequested Law Library search X Issued Examiner’s Amendment
for: and entered changes in TRADEUPSPRINT DO NOT PRINT Added design code in TRADEUPS
Description of the mark
Translation statement Re-imaged standard character
drawing
Negative translation statement
Consent of living individual Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
about misclassified definite ID
Changed TRADEUPS to:
Dear Ms. Hayes,
Thank you for your email and assistance with this matter.
Yes - I give authorization to address these issues via Examiner's Amendment.
Please amend/address the issues you have stated. Thank you again.
Best Regards,
Allen Yu
Goldwell Enterprises, Inc.
2019 S Acacia Ct
Compton, CA 90220 USA
*********************************************************************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if
you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this
e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited by law.
*********************************************************************************************************************************
On 2019-08-22 12:25, Hayes, Ashley wrote:
> Mr. Yu,
>
> I am the examining attorney handling this application. I have
> reviewed the response to the office action. Thank you. Although the
> amended description of the mark and specimen are acceptable, a
> disclaimer is needed for the design of the container because it is
> descriptive of the goods. The disclaimer would read as follows:
>
> · No claim is made to the exclusive right to use the design of
> the container apart from the mark as shown.
>
> Additionally, because the mark is of the sytlized design of the bottle
> with the wording, the stippling statement (that "the stippling is for
> shading purposes only") is unnecessary and should be removed.
>
> With your autorization, I can address these issues via Examiner's
> Amendment, obviating the need for a formal Office action and placing
> the application in order for publication.
>
> Please advise. Kindly note that I am due to take action on this
> application by close of business tomorrow (Friday 8/23). I apologize
> for the short notice but I did want to reach out in the event you were
> able to respond in time allowing me to handle these changes for you
> rather than issueing an additional formal Office action.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ashley D. Hayes
>
> Examining Attorney, Law Office 108
>
> United States Patent & Trademark Office
>
> (571) 272-2826
>