Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) Regarding Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this office action. 

 

Issue date:  July 24, 2019

 

The undersigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

The office records have been searched, and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.

 

Applicant Must Amend The Identification

 

Applicant must clarify some of the wording in the identification, as shown below, because it is indefinite. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. The wording is indefinite because it does not make clear the exact nature of the services.

 

Additionally, the wording “including” and “etc.” in Class 41 is indefinite and fails to be all-inclusive. See TMEP §1402.03(a).  The word “including” must be replaced with a definite term, such as “namely.” See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a). The word “etc.” must be clarified by (1) specifying the common commercial or generic name for these services, or (2) deleting this wording. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a).  

 

The wording in the suggested identification that appears in bold and italics shows the additions that are being proposed. Wording that should be deleted is shown with a line through it as follows: strikethrough. Applicant should enter amendments in standard font, not in bold, italics or strikethrough.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

“Educational services, namely, a continuing programming and training services accessible by means of radio and television in the field of natural gas sample take-off conditioning and natural gas analysis apparatus and systems; educational services, namely, conducting programsming and training services in the field of natural gas sample take-off conditioning and natural gas analysis apparatus and systems; providing educational services, namely, conducting programs including presentations, seminars, training, and instructional classes, etc. in the field of natural gas sampling, natural gas sample take-off conditioning, and natural gas analysis apparatus and systems; and providing a mobile educational training facility for others to conducting such programs in the field of natural gas sampling, natural gas sample take-off conditioning, and natural gas analysis apparatus and systems,” in International Class 41; and

 

“Engineering services, including generating and providing phase curves; and engineering design services in the field of natural gas sampling and custody transfer; calibration services for sample takeoff equipment and energy content audit verification,” in International Class 42.

 

Applicant’s services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification. However, applicant may not substitute different services or add services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b). The scope of the services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b). Any acceptable changes to the services will further limit scope, and once services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted. TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identification and classification in trademark applications, please consult the USPTO’s online searchable ID Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Applicant Must Submit A Disclaimer

 

Applicant must provide a disclaimer of the unregistrable parts of the applied-for mark even though the mark as a whole appears to be registrable. See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a). A disclaimer is a statement in the application record that an applicant does not claim exclusive rights to an unregistrable component of the mark. TMEP §1213. The disclaimer of an unregistrable part of a mark will not affect the mark’s appearance. See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965).

 

In this case, applicant must disclaim the word “SAMPLING” because it is not inherently distinctive. This unregistrable term is merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a). 

 

The following cases further explain the disclaimer requirement: Dena Corp. v. Belvedere Int’l Inc., 950 F.2d 1555, 21 USPQ2d 1047 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Brown-Forman Corp., 81 USPQ2d 1284 (TTAB 2006); In re Kraft, Inc., 218 USPQ 571 (TTAB 1983).

 

The services are in the field of sampling, as evidenced by the identification of services. The word therefore describes the subject matter of the services.

 

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format: 

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SAMPLING” apart from the mark as shown. 

 

If applicant does not provide the required disclaimer, the USPTO may refuse to register the entire mark. See In re Stereotaxis Inc., 429 F.3d 1039, 1041, 77 USPQ2d 1087, 1089 (Fed. Cir. 2005); TMEP §1213.01(b). For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this disclaimer requirement online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please see the disclaimer page.

 

TEAS RF Application Requirements

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid email correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by email throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or email without incurring this additional fee.

 

Applicant is invited to contact the assigned examining attorney with any questions regarding this action.

 

/Katherine S. Chang/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 115

571.270.1528

katherine.chang@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

 

• How to respond: click to file a response to this non-final office action.

 

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon. A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight eastern time of the last day of the response period. TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon. If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant. If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

·       If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the law office referenced in the signature block.

 

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on July 24, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88419250

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Katherine S. Chang/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 115

571.270.1528

katherine.chang@uspto.gov

 

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from July 24, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”