To: | Xiamen Topgreen Environmental Protection ETC. (linasmeng@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88418206 - HANANA - N/A |
Sent: | July 23, 2019 04:15:05 PM |
Sent As: | ecom104@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88418206
Mark: HANANA
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Xiamen Topgreen Environmental Protection ETC.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: July 23, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
ENTITY CLARIFICATION REQUIRED
If applicant is an individual, applicant must provide his or her full name for the record. TMEP §803.03(a). Alternatively, if applicant is a company, such as a limited liability company or corporation, applicant should request that the legal entity type be amended to the appropriate entity type and provide the U.S. state or foreign country of incorporation or organization. TMEP §803.03(h). Applicant should note that all of its other eight applications appear to list the entity type as “limited liability company.”
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration may be refused because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE ADVISORY
Applicant may file a designation of domestic representative form online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp. Alternatively, applicant may complete and submit the form set forth below to designate a domestic representative on paper via regular mail.
A designation of domestic representative must be personally signed or include an electronic signature personally entered by the individual applicant, someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner), or an authorized attorney. 37 C.F.R. §§2.24(a)(1)(ii), 2.193(a), (e)(8); TMEP §610. In the case of joint applicants, all must sign. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(8); TMEP §610.
DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE
__________________________ _____________________________
Identify the Mark U.S. Application Serial No.
__________________________ _____________________________
Name of Applicant Date of Signature
______________________________________________________________________
(Name of Domestic Representative)
whose postal address is ___________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
is hereby-designated applicant’s domestic representative upon whom notices or process in proceedings affecting the mark may be served.
____________________________
(Signature)
____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. In addition, because applicant filed a TEAS Plus application, applicant must respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to avoid incurring an additional fee. See 37 C.F.R. §2.22(b)(1), (c). Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
CONSIDER LEGAL ASSISTANCE
For attorney referral information, applicant may consult the American Bar Association’s Consumers’ Guide to Legal Help; an online directory of legal professionals, such as FindLaw®; or a local telephone directory. The USPTO, however, may not assist an applicant in the selection of a private attorney. 37 C.F.R. §2.11.
ASSISTANCE
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Jonathan Ryan O'Rourke/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 104
571-270-1561
jonathan.orourke@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE